Foundationalism and arbitrariness

14Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Nonskeptical foundationalists say that there are basic beliefs. But, one might object, either there is a reason why basic beliefs are likely to be true or there is not. If there is, then they are not basic; if there is not, then they are arbitrary. I argue that this dilemma is not nearly as decisive as its author, Peter Klein, would have us believe. © 2005 University of Southern California and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Howard-Snyder, D. (2005). Foundationalism and arbitrariness. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 86(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2005.00212.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free