Abstract
The paper discusses how well Kuhn’s general theory of scientific revolutions fits the particular case of the chemical revolution. To do so, I first present condensed sketches of both Kuhn’s theory and the chemical revolution. I then discuss the beginning of the chemical revolution and compare it to Kuhn’s specific claims about the roles of anomalies, crisis and extraordinary science in scientific development. I proceed by comparing some features of the chemical revolution as a whole to Kuhn’s general account. The result will be that Kuhn’s general description of scientific revolutions fits the chemical revolution extraordinarily well. However, this result should not be taken as an empirical confirmation of Kuhn’s theory, but rather as an indication that the chemical revolution is a constitutive part of it.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Phlogiston theory was last treated in Kuhn’s writings in Kuhn (1983, pp. 674–678).
Cohen (1985, p. 236).
Kuhn SSR, p. 102.
For these modifications, see e.g. Ströker (1982, pp. 115–217); see also Kuhn SSR, pp. 70–72.
See e.g. Ströker (1982, p. 167).
Kuhn (1983, p. 675).
See e.g. Ströker (1982, pp. 111–112).
Ströker (1982, pp. 106–107).
Ströker (1982, pp. 166–170, 191–194).
Perrin (1990, p. 266).
Compare Ströker (1982, pp. 115–217).
Ströker (1982, pp. 96, 240).
Cohen (1985, pp. 235–236).
Ströker (1982, pp. 239–243).
Kuhn SSR, p. 55.
See Hoyningen-Huene (1993, Sects. 7.1–7.3).
Primas and Müller-Herold (1990, pp. 263–271).
Kuhn (1961, pp. 206–207, 210); SSR, pp. 69–72.
Ströker (1982, p. 62).
Ströker (1982, pp. 68–69, 104).
Ströker (1982, p. 83).
Ströker (1982, pp. 71 fn. 7; 149, 166).
Ströker (1982, pp. 222, 234).
Ströker (1982, p. 120).
Ströker (1982, pp. 127–128).
However, it should be noted that for Stahl this anomaly was already on its way to becoming a significant anomaly. As phlogiston’s particles were assumed to be very light, as early as 1718 it was doubtful to Stahl whether phlogiston, by itself, could account for any weight changes, whether positive of negative, in the given class of chemical reactions (Ströker 1982, pp. 105, 114).
Ströker (1982, p. 104).
Ströker (1982, p. 221).
Ströker (1982, pp. 60–61).
Ströker (1982, pp. 223–226).
Brock (1993, pp. 101–103).
Kuhn SSR, pp. 56, 57.
Ströker (1982, p. 177).
For Kuhn’s view of research in the crisis state, see Hoyningen-Huene (1993, Sect. 7.3.b).
Ströker (1982, pp. 177, 235–238).
Ströker (1982, pp. 177–178, 247–249).
Ströker (1982, pp. 258–262).
Kuhn SSR, p. 72.
Ströker (1982, pp. 246–252).
Ströker (1982, pp. 251–252).
On expected discoveries, see Hoyningen-Huene (1993, Sect. 5.2.c), on unexpected discoveries see ibid., Sect. 7.2.
Kuhn SSR, p. 58.
Kuhn SSR, p. 53.
Compare Hoyningen-Huene (1993, Sect. 7.4.a).
Ströker (1982, pp. 237–238).
Hoyningen-Huene (1993, pp. 260–261).
Kuhn SSR, p. 107; see also Kuhn (1977, pp. 335–336).
Kuhn SSR, p. 107, similarly on p. 148; Kuhn (1977, p. 336).
Kuhn SSR, p. 108.
For details, see Hoyningen-Huene (1993, Sects. 7.4 and 7.5).
Kuhn (1977, p. 323).
Kuhn SSR, p. 159; Ströker (1982, p. 294).
See Hoyningen-Huene (1993, pp. 159–160, 199, 217–218), and references therein.
Gough (1988, pp. 16–17).
Brock (1993, p. 119).
Kuhn SSR, p. 55.
I have dealt with this tricky topic at length in Hoyningen-Huene (1993), Part II: Scientific Knowledge and Its Object, pp. 29–162.
Kuhn SSR, p. 118.
See Putnam (1978, p. 25).
On this issue, compare Hoyningen-Huene (1993, Sect. 1.2).
See Hoyningen-Huene (1993, pp. 3–4, fn. 3).
See Hoyningen-Huene (1993, especially Sects. 3.6 and 4.4).
References
Brock, W.H.: The Norton History of Chemistry. Norton, New York (1993)
Cohen, I.B.: Revolution in Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1985)
Donovan, A. (ed.): The Chemical Revolution: Essays in Reinterpretation (Osiris vol. 4). History of Science Society, Philadelphia (1988)
Gough, J.B.: Lavoisier and the fulfilment of the Stahlian revolution. In: Donovan, A. (ed.) The Chemical Revolution: Essays in Reinterpretation (Osiris vol. 4), pp. 15–33. History of Science Society, Philadelphia (1988)
Hesse, M.: Comment on Kuhn’s “Commensurability, comparability, communicability”. In: Asquith, P.D., Nickles, T. (eds.) PSA 1982. Proceedings of the 1982 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2, pp. 704–711. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing (1983)
Hoyningen-Huene, P.: Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions. Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993)
Kuhn, T.S.: Newton’s “31st query” and the degradation of gold. Isis 42, 296–298 (1951)
Kuhn, T.S.: Robert Boyle and structural chemistry in the seventeenth century. Isis 43, 12–36 (1952a)
Kuhn, T.S.: Reply to M. Boas: Newton and the theory of chemical solutions. Isis 43, 123–124 (1952b)
Kuhn, T.S.: The independence of density and pore-size in Newton’s theory of matter. Isis 43, 364–365 (1952c).
Kuhn, T.S.: The function of measurement in modern physical science. Isis 52, 161–193 (1961); reprinted in The Essential Tension. Selected Studies 548 in Scientific Tradition and Change, pp. 178–224. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1977)
Kuhn, T.S. (=SSR): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. (1970). University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1962a)
Kuhn, T.S.: The historical structure of scientific discovery. Science 136, 760–764 (1962b); reprinted in The Essential Tension. Selected Studies 548 in Scientific Tradition and Change, pp. 165–177. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1977)
Kuhn, T.S.: Postscript – 1969. In: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn., pp. 174–210. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1970)
Kuhn, T.S.: Second thoughts on paradigms. In: Suppe, F. (ed.) The Structure of Scientific Theories, pp. 459–482. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1974); reprinted in ET pp. 293–319
Kuhn, T.S.: Theory change as structure-change: comments on the Sneed formalism. Erkenntnis 10, 179–199 (1976)
Kuhn, T.S.: Objectivity, Value Judgement, and Theory Choice. In: The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, pp. 320–339. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1977)
Kuhn, T.S.: Metaphor in science. In: Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, pp. 409–419. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1979)
Kuhn, T.S.: Commensurability, comparability, communicability. In: Asquith, P.D., Nickles, T. (eds.): PSA 1982. Proceedings of the 1982 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2, pp. 669–688. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing (1983)
Perrin, C.E.: The chemical revolution. In: Olby, R.C., Cantor, G.N., Christie, J.R.R., Hodge, M.J.S. (eds.) Companion to the History of Modern Science, pp. 264–277. Routledge, London (1990)
Primas, H., Müller-Herold, U.: Elementare Quantenchemie. Teubner, Stuttgart (1990)
Putnam, H.: Meaning and the Moral Sciences. Routledge & Kegan, London (1978)
Ströker, E.: Theoriewandel in der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Chemie im 18. Jahrhundert. Klostermann, Frankfurt (1982)
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank Martin Carrier for the correction of an inaccuracy in an earlier version of this paper, and Eric Oberheim and Peter Barker for substantial linguistic improvements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An earlier version of this article appeared as Hoyningen-Huene, Paul (1998): “Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution”. In Prospettive della logica e della filosofia della scienza. Atti del Convegno Triennale della Società Italiana di Logica e Filosofia delle Scienze, Roma, 3–5 gennaio 1996, edited by V. M. Abrusci, C. Cellucci, R. Cordeschi and V. Fano. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, pp. 483–498.
Republished with kind permission of Edizioni ETS.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoyningen-Huene, P. Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution. Found Chem 10, 101–115 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-008-9044-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-008-9044-7