Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does Environmental Information Disclosure Benefit Waste Discharge Reduction? Evidence from China

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a tool for regulating the environment in China, does environmental information disclosure reduce pollutant discharge? To answer this question, we empirically analyzed the emission data of “the three wastes” (i.e., waste gas, wastewater, and solid waste) in unit industrial GDP in 31 provincial units. As a measure to reduce institutional emission, environmental information disclosure only slightly influenced waste discharge reduction in the implementation period of the Eleventh Five-Year Plan of China. Instead, command control and market-based tools significantly affected waste discharge reduction. Representative measures included penalties and charges. With the continuously enhanced pressure of control, environmental information disclosure facilitates the effects of command control tools on waste discharge reduction. Content analysis of environmental information disclosed by sample listed companies in Jiangsu Province was conducted. The disclosure of insufficient environmental information on emission reduction can be attributed to “adverse selection” in system performance (i.e., the selective disclosure trend considering “greenwashing” in the listed companies) and to the limited quality of overall environmental information disclosure. This study provides empirical evidence for Chinese policy makers to improve the system for environmental information disclosure of listed companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bao, Q., Chen, Y. Y., & Song, L. G. (2011). Foreign direct investment and environmental pollution in China: A simultaneous equations estimation. Environment and Development Economics, 16(1), 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T., & Kfhler, J. (1998). Equity and ecotax reform in the EU: Achieving a 10 per cent reduction in CO2 emissions using excise duties. Fiscal Studies, 19(4), 375–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bemelmans-Videc, M. L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. (1998). Carrots, sticks and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennear, L. S., & Olmstead, S. M. (2008). The impacts of the “right to know”: Information disclosure and the violation of drinking water standards. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56(2), 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, A. (2010). Alternative pollution control policies in developing countries. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(2), 234–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, A., & Harrington, W. (2000). The use of economic incentives in developing countries: Lessons from international experience with industrial air pollution. Journal of Environment and Development, 9(1), 5–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, P. (1997). The economics of environmental protection: Theory and demand revelation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Bressers, T. A., & Schuddeboom, J. (1994). A survey of effluent charges and other economic instruments in Dutch environmental policy. In Applying economic instruments to environmental policies in OECD and dynamic non-member economies (pp. 153–172). Paris: OECD.

  • Brouhle, K., Grifiths, C., & Wolverton, A. (2009). Evaluating the role of EPA policy levers: An examination of a voluntary program and regulatory threat in the metal-finishing industry. Journal Environmental Economics and Management, 57(2), 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruvoll, A., & Larsen, B. M. (2004). Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: Do carbon taxes work. Energy Policy, 32(4), 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrol, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y. L., Jiang, P., & Tan, W. Q. (2010). A transparency disclosure index measuring disclosures: Chinese listed companies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(3), 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CWS. (1995). Responsible retailing. Manchester, UK: Co-operative Whole Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., Bi, J., Wheeler, D., Wang, J. N., Cao, D., Lu, G. F., et al. (2004). Environmental performance rating and disclosure: China’s GreenWatch program. Journal of Environmental Management, 71(2), 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Mamingi, N., & Wang, H. (2001). Inspection, pollution price, and environmental performance: Evidence from China. Ecological Economics, 36(3), 487–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., Wheeler, D., & Wang, H. (2007). Disclosure strategies for pollution control. In T. Teitenberg & H. Folmer (Eds.), International yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2006/2007: A survey of current issues. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, A. R. (2001). An evaluation of “essays on disclosure” and the disclosure literature in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1), 181–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foulon, J., Lanoie, P., & Laplante, B. (2002). Incentives for pollution control: Regulation or information? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(1), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, J. H., Afsah, S., & Sterner, T. (2009). Which firms are more sensitive to public disclosure schemes for pollution control? Evidence from Indonesia’s PROPER program. Environmental & Resource Economics, 42(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, J. H., Sterner, T., & Afsah, S. (2007). Public disclosure of industrial pollution: The PROPER approach for Indonesia? Environment and Development Economics, 12(6), 739–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, N. (2000). Environmental contingencies and sustainable modes of corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19(3), 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, T. G., & Garry, T. (2003). An overview of content analysis. The Marketing Review, 3(4), 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettige, H., & Wheeler, D. (1996). Determinants of pollution abatement in developing countries: Evidence from south and southeast Asia. World Development, 24(12), 1891–1904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R. B., & Zhao, Q. (2010). The realization mechanism and path innovaion for Taihu Lake water pollution governance by means of environmental auditing. China Soft Science, 25(3), 66–73, 151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, T. S., & McKibbin, W. J. (2002). Assessment of China’s pollution levy system: An equilibrium pollution approach. Environment and Development Economics, 7(1), 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, H. H., Qian, Y. Y., & Weingast, B. R. (2005). Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese Style. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9), 1719–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. R. (2003). ‘New’ instruments of environmental governance: Patterns and pathways of change. Environmental Politics, 12(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose, A., & Lee, S. M. (2007). Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content analysis based on website disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, S., Ranjani, K., & Lester, L. (2001). Estimating the hidden costs of environmental regulation. The Accounting Review, 76(2), 171–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Y. F., & Liu, Y. L. (2009). Environmental stringency and foreign direct investment inflows: Testing the pollution haven hypothesis in China. Journal of International Business and Economics, 9(3), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria, V. (2006). Controlling water pollution in developing and transition countries: Lessons from three successful cases. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(4), 405–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria, V. (2009). Public disclosures: Using information to reduce pollution in developing countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11(5), 955–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, M. (2001). Non-mandatory approaches to environmental protection. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), 291–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, D. A. (2008). The effectiveness of voluntary environmental programs—A policy at a crossroads? Policy Studies Journal, 35(4), 689–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, D. A., & Spengler, J. D. (2007). The toxic release inventory: Fact or fiction? A case study of the primary aluminum industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(2), 296–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad, D. C. (1986). Empirical properties of economic incentives and command-and-control regulations for air pollution control. Land Economics, 62(3), 250–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konar, S., & Cohen, M. (1997). Information as regulation: The effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32(1), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, L., Yeh, C. C., & Yu, H. C. (2012). Disclosure of corporate social responsibility and environmental management: Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(5), 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvalseth, T. O. (1991). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales: An asymmetric version of Kappa. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(1), 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D. (1999). Lowering the cost of pollution control versus controlling pollution. Public Choice, 100(1/2), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. X., Liu, J. Y., & Li, D. D. (2012). Getting their voices heard: Three cases of public participation in environmental protection in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 98(1), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. B., & Zhou, L. A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9), 1743–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Q. H., Chen, G. Y., Du, W. C., & Niu, H. P. (2012). Spillover effect of environmental investment: Evidence from panel data at provincial level in China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 6(3), 412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, L. J. (2001). Implementation from above: The ecology of Sweden’s new environmental governance. Governance—An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 14(3), 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T., & Maxwell, J. (2002). Voluntary approaches to environmental regulation: A survey. In M. Frazini & A. Nicita (Eds.), Economic institutions and environmental policy. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 41(3), 3–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, T. M., & Bruce, Y. (1984). Estimation of the cost of air pollution control regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 11(3), 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X. H., Zeng, S. X., & Tam, C. M. (2013). Whether top executives’ turnover influences environmental responsibility: From the perspective of environmental information disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montes-Sancho, M. J., & Delmas, M. (2010). Information disclosure policies: Evidence from the electricity industry. Economy Inquiry, 48(2), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montinola, G., Qian, Y. Y., & Weigast, B. R. (1995). Federalism, Chinese style: The political basis for economic success in China. World Politics, 48(1), 50–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskala, M., & Pretes, M. (1995). Environmental reporting in Finland: A note on the use of annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(6), 457–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordberg-Bohm, V. (1999). Stimulating ‘green’ technological innovation: An analysis of alternative policy mechanisms. Policy Sciences, 32(1), 13–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007). Environmental performance reviews: China. Château de la Muette, Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

  • Powers, N., Blackman, A., Lyon, T. P., & Narain, U. (2011). Does disclosure reduce pollution? Evidence from India’s Green Rating Project. Environmental & Resource Economics, 50(1), 131–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricky, Y. K. C., & Lorett, B. Y. L. (2000). Antecedents of green purchases: A survey in China. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(4), 338–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, V. P. (2009). Environmental regulation: Law, science, and policy. Tex: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, M. T. (2002). Pathways to industrial environmental improvement in the East Asian newly industrializing economies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, H. T., & Li, Y. X. L. (2010). Environmental information disclosure of listed companies in China’s heavy polluting industries. Securities Market Herald, 17(6), 51–57 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavins, R. N. (1996). Correlated uncertainty and policy instrument choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(2), 218–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T. (1998). Disclosure strategies for pollution control. Environmental & Resource Economics, 11(3), 587–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, T. (2007). Information disclosure policies: When do they bring environmental improvements? International Advances in Economic Research, 13(1), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (2002). Pollution regulation and abatement efforts: Evidence from China. Ecological Economics, 41(1), 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Jin, Y. H. (2007). Industrial ownership and environmental performance: Evidence from China. Environmental & Resource Economics, 36(3), 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Wheeler, D. (2003). Equilibrium pollution and economic development in China. Environment and Development Economics, 8(3), 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Wheeler, D. (2005). Financial incentives and endogenous enforcement in China’s pollution levy system. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49(1), 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1998). Five years after Rio: Innovations in environmental policy. Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monographs Series No. 18. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Wu, Y. R. (2010). Regional environmental performance and its determinants in China. China & World Economy, 18(3), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YCELP. (2013). The 2012 environmental performance index ranking. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy (YCELP).

  • Zeng, S. X., Xu, X. D., Dong, Z. Y., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2010). Towards corporate environmental information disclosure: An empirical study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12), 1142–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is the stage achievement of the Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China, Study on Environmental Auditing Regulations of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction (11BGL062).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of International Auditing, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, 210029, People’s Republic of China

    Rongbing Huang & Danping Chen

Authors
  1. Rongbing Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danping Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rongbing Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, R., Chen, D. Does Environmental Information Disclosure Benefit Waste Discharge Reduction? Evidence from China. J Bus Ethics 129, 535–552 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2173-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2173-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation