Brief articleDoes representational momentum reflect a distortion of the length or the endpoint of a trajectory?☆
Introduction
Memory for the final position of a moving target is often displaced in the direction of implied motion, and this has been referred to as representational momentum (Freyd & Finke, 1984; for review, see Hubbard, 1995). Early theories of representational momentum suggested that this displacement resulted from an internalization of the principles of momentum; much as a moving physical object possessed momentum, so too did the mental representation of that moving physical object possess an analogous form of momentum (e.g. see Finke, Freyd, & Shyi, 1986). A literal momentum metaphor has subsequently been abandoned by researchers, and a number of alternative mechanisms have been proposed including spatiotemporal coherence (Freyd, 1987, Freyd, 1993), implicit knowledge of physical principles (Hubbard, 1998), second-order isomorphism between mental representation and subjective aspects of momentum (Hubbard, 1999), belief in naive impetus (Kozhevnikov & Hegarty, in press), pursuit eye movements (Kerzel, 2000), and properties of image schema (Gibbs & Berg, in press).
Regardless of the mechanism involved, representational momentum is usually considered to reflect bias in memory for the final position of a moving target. In the absence of any discussion regarding memory for prior positions of a target, theories of representational momentum may be read as suggesting that prior positions of the target are represented veridically (or that bias in memory for prior positions is not related to bias in memory for the final position; see top of Fig. 1). However, previous investigators reported that memory for the initial position of a moving target may be displaced forward, and this has been referred to as the Fröhlich Effect (e.g. Kirschfeld and Kammer, 1999, Müsseler and Aschersleben, 1998). Consideration of the Fröhlich Effect raises the possibility that forward displacement in memory for the final position of a moving target might reflect displacement of the entire trajectory rather than displacement of just the final position (see bottom of Fig. 1). Different mechanisms would presumably underlie displacement of the entire trajectory and displacement of just the final position, and so whether a Fröhlich Effect accompanies representational momentum is of interest for theories of representational momentum.
Studies of the Fröhlich Effect usually present faster target velocities than do studies of representational momentum. Within the range of velocities used in studies on the Fröhlich Effect (i.e. typically >20°/s), the magnitude of the Fröhlich Effect decreases with decreases in target velocity (Müsseler and Aschersleben, 1998, Müsseler and Neumann, 1992), and so it is not clear that a Fröhlich Effect would be exhibited within the range of slower velocities used in studies on representational momentum (i.e. typically <20°/s). Indeed, with such slower velocities memory for initial position exhibits a backward displacement (e.g. Actis Grosso, Stucchi, & Vacario, 1996), and this has been referred to as the Onset Repulsion Effect (e.g. Thornton, in press). If an Onset Repulsion Effect were found in memory for the initial position of a target, then a forward displacement in memory for the final position of a target could not result from a forward displacement in memory for the entire trajectory.
Previous investigations of the Fröhlich Effect, Onset Repulsion Effect, and representational momentum usually focused only on memory for either initial position or final position. Therefore, it has not been possible to determine how these displacements might be related to each other or to memory for the entire trajectory. Thornton (in press) recently assessed memory for initial position and final position of a moving target, and although judgments of initial position and judgments of final position were not directly compared, backward displacement for initial position and forward displacement for final position were reported. Such a pattern is not consistent with forward displacement of the entire trajectory or with forward displacement of only the final position. The purpose of the current experiments was to assess and directly compare memory for the initial position and the final position, and to determine whether displacement in memory for the final position reflects a displacement of the entire trajectory or of only the endpoint.
Section snippets
Experiment 1
Observers viewed a computer-generated image of a smoothly moving target that appeared and vanished at uncued locations, and immediately after the target vanished, an auditory cue instructed observers to indicate where the target had appeared or had vanished. Memory for final position should be displaced in the direction of motion. If a Fröhlich Effect in memory for initial position is exhibited, then that would suggest that representational momentum results from forward displacement of the
Experiment 2
In Experiment 1, observers did not know until after the target vanished whether they would report initial position or final position, and so they needed to maintain the entire trajectory (or at least the initial and final positions) in memory until the auditory cue was presented. However, in studies of the Fröhlich Effect and in studies of representational momentum, observers are usually aware that memory for just initial position or just final position will be examined, and so there is no need
General discussion
Memory for the initial position of a moving target was displaced in the direction opposite to target motion, and memory for the final position of a moving target was displaced in the direction of target motion. This pattern lets us reject the hypothesis that forward displacement in memory for final position results from forward displacement of the entire trajectory. However, observers who exhibited larger forward displacement of final position also exhibited larger backward displacement of
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Ian Thornton and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.
References (25)
Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target
Vision Research
(2000)- et al.
The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast
Vision Research
(1999) Spatio-temporal intersection of visual events: misjudging the spatial component
- et al.
On the length of trajectories for moving dots
Memory psychophysics: an examination of its perceptual and cognitive prospects
- et al.
Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
(1986) Dynamic mental representations
Psychological Review
(1987)Five hunches about perceptual processes and dynamic representations
- et al.
Representational momentum
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
(1984) - et al.
A velocity effect for representational momentum
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
(1985)
Probing the time course of representational momentum
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Cited by (35)
Localizing the onset of moving stimuli by pointing or relative judgment: Variations in the size of the Fröhlich effect
2008, Vision ResearchCitation Excerpt :In contrast, the onset-repulsion effect was observed when target onset positions were completely unpredictable. For example, in the study of Thornton (2002, see also Hubbard & Motes, 2002) the target onset was random within a larger square field. Additionally, target motion could be in one of four directions (up, down, left or right).
Pseudoneglect in back space
2007, Brain and CognitionEffects of Spatial Cueing on Representational Momentum
2009, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and CognitionPhasic alertness boosts representational momentum
2022, Frontiers in PsychologyThe implicit sense of agency is not a perceptual effect but is a judgment effect
2022, Cognitive Processing
- ☆
These data were presented at the European Conference on Visual Perception, Kusadasi, Turkey, August 2001.