Skip to main content
Log in

The Problem Of Defeasible Justification

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Alston, W.: 1985, ‘Concepts of Epistemic Justification’, The Monist 68, 57–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R.: 1988, Belief, Justification, and Knowledge, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R.:1991, ‘Justification, Deductive Closure and Reasons to Believe’, Dialogue 30, 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R.: 1995, ‘Deductive Closure, Defeasibility, and Scepticism: A Reply to Feldman’, PhilosophicalQuarterly 45, 494–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L.: 1962, Sense and Sensibilia, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R.: 1984, Meditations on First Philosophy, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. II (tr. by Cottingham, Stoothoff, and Murdoch), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Dretske, F.:1970, ‘Epistemic Operators’, Journal of Philosophy 67, 1007–1023.

  • Dretske, F.: 1981, ‘The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge’, Philosophical Studies 40, 363–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P.:1949, ‘Russell's Doubts About Induction’, Mind 58, 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R.: 1995, ‘InDefense of Closure’, Philosophical Quarterly 45, 487–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1955, ‘The NewRiddle of Induction’, in Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Chapter 3, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1960, ‘Inductive Inconsistencies’, Synthese 12, 439–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huemer, M.:forthcoming, ‘Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

  • Jeffrey, R.: 1984, Letter to editor in ‘Matters Arising’, Nature 310, 433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P.:1981, Certainty: A Refutation of Skepticism, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

  • Klein, P.:1995, ‘Skepticism and Closure: Why the Evil Genius Argument Fails’, Philosophical Topics 23, 213–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1972, Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R.: 1981, Philosophical Explanations, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.and D. Miller: 1983, ‘A Proof of the Impossibility of Inductive Probability’, Nature 302, 687–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stine, G.: 1976, ‘Skepticism, Relevant Alternatives, and Deductive Closure’,Philosophical Studies 29, 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stove, D. C.: 1973, Probability and Hume's InductiveSkepticism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stove, D. C.: 1986, The Rationality of Induction,Clarendon Press, Oxford. Department of Philosophy University of Colorado at Boulder 169 Hellems Campus Box 232 Boulder, CO 80309-0232 U.S.A. E-mail: ow11@sprynet.com

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huemer, M. The Problem Of Defeasible Justification. Erkenntnis 54, 375–397 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010718330593

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010718330593

Keywords

Navigation