Skip to main content
Log in

Don’t Ever Do That! Long-term Duties in PD e L

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies long-term norms concerning actions. In Meyer’s Propositional Deontic Logic (PD e L), only immediate duties can be expressed, however, often one has duties of longer durations such as: “Never do that”, or “Do this someday”. In this paper, we will investigate how to amend PD e L so that such long-term duties can be expressed. This leads to the interesting and suprising consequence that the long-term prohibition and obligation are not interdefinable in our semantics, while there is a duality between these two notions. As a consequence, we have provided a new analysis of the long-term obligation by introducing a new atomic proposition I (indebtedness) to represent the condition that an agent has some unfulfilled obligation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson A.R.: ‘Some Nasty Problems in the Formalization of Ethics’. Noûs 1, 345–360 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Castañeda, H.-N., ‘The Paradoxes of Deontic Logic’, in R. Hilpinen (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic, Reidel, 1981, pp. 37–85.

  3. Harel, D., ‘Dynamic Logic’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume II: Extensions of Classical Logic, Reidel, 1984, pp. 497–604.

  4. Kevin, K., The Logic of Reliable Inquiry, Oxford University Press, 1996.

  5. Meyer J.J-.Ch.: ‘A Different Approach to Deontic Logic: Deontic Logic viewed as a Variant of Dynamic Logic’. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29, 106–136 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer, J. J-.Ch., ‘Using Programming Concepts in Deontic Reasoning’, in R. Bartsch, J.F.A.K. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expression, FORIS publications, 1989, pp. 117–145.

  7. Meyer, J. J-.Ch., ‘Dynamic Logic for Reasoning about Actions and Agents’, in J. Minker (ed.), Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence, Kluwer, 2000, pp. 281–311.

  8. Pratt, V.R., ‘Process logic Preliminary Report’, Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, ACM Press, 1979, pp. 93–100.

  9. van der Meyden R.: ‘The Dynamic Logic of Permission’. Journal of Logic and Computation 3, 465–479 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. von Wright G.H.: ‘Deontic Logic’. Mind 60, 1–15 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lambèr M. M. Royakkers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes, J., Royakkers, L.M.M. Don’t Ever Do That! Long-term Duties in PD e L . Stud Logica 89, 59–79 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-008-9118-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-008-9118-5

Keywords

Navigation