Skip to main content
Log in

False Though Partly True – An Experiment in Logic

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explore in an experimental spirit the prospects for extending classical propositional logic with a new operator P intended to be interpreted when prefixed to a formula as saying that formula in question is at least partly true. The paradigm case of something which is, in the sense envisaged, false though still “partly” true is a conjunction one of whose conjuncts is false while the other is true. Ideally, we should like such a logic to extend classical logic – or any fragment thereof under consideration – conservatively, to be closed under uniform substitution (of arbitrary formulas for sentence letters or propositional variables), and to allow the substitutivity of provably equivalent formulas salva provabilitate. To varying degrees, we experience some difficulties only with this last (‘congruentiality’) desideratum in the two four-valued logics we end up giving our most extended consideration to.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D.: Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. I, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blamey, S.: Partial logic, in D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic III: Alternatives to Classical Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986, pp. 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley, F. H.: The Principles of Logic, Vol. I, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 1992 (First edition 1883).

  4. Brink, C.: Power structures, Algebra Universalis 39 (1992), 177–216.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brzozowski, J. A.: De Morgan bisemilattices, in 30th IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 2000, pp. 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, W. S.: The propositional logic of ordinary discourse, Inquiry 11 (1968), 295–320.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cresswell, M. J.: Classical intensional logics, Theoria 36 (1970), 347–372.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Demos, R.: Partly so and partly not so, Mind 68 (1959), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fuhrmann, A.: When hyperpropositions meet..., J. Philos. Logic 28 (1999), 559–574.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gautam, N. D.: The validity of equations of complex algebras, Math. Logik und Grundlagenforsch. 3 (1957), 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldblatt, R.: Varieties of complex algebras, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 44 (1989), 173–242.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Humberstone, L.: Logical subtraction: Problems and prospects, Talk given at a University College (London) philosophy colloquium, 1981.

  13. Humberstone, L.: Singulary extensional connectives: A aloser look, J. Philos. Logic 26 (1997), 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Humberstone, L.: Contra-classical logics, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2000), 437–474.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Humberstone, L.: Parts and partitions, Theoria 66 (2000), 41–82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis, D.: General semantics, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972, pp. 169–218.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lewis, D.: Statements partly about observation, Philosophical Papers 17 (1988), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, D.: Popper's qualitative theory of verisimilitude, British J. Philos. Sci. 25 (1974), 166–177.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, D.: Verisimilitude redeflated, British J. Philos. Sci. 27 (1976), 363–402.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oddie, G.: Likeness to Truth, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rautenberg, W.: A calculus for the common rules of ∧ and ∨, Studia Logica 48 (1989), 531–537.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rautenberg, W.: Axiomatization of semigroup consequences, Arch. Math. Logic 29 (1989), 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rautenberg, W.: Common logic of 2-valued semigroup connectives, Z. Math. Logik Grundlag. Math. 37 (1991), 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rescher, N.: Many-Valued Logic, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Romanowska, A.: On distributivity of bisemilattices with one distributive law, in B. Csákány et al. (eds.), Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai 29: Universal Algebra, Esztergom (Hungary), 1977, pp. 653–661.

  26. Sainsbury, R. M.: Degrees of truth and degrees of truth, Philosophical Papers 15 (1986), 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Scott, D. S.: Completeness and axiomatizability in many-valued logic, in L. Henkin et al. (eds.), Procs. of the Tarski Symposium, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1974, pp. 188–197.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Segerberg, K.: Classical Propositional Operators, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shafaat, A.: On varieties closed under the construction of power algebras, Bull. Australian Math. Soc. 11 (1974), 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shoesmith, D. J. and Smiley, T. J.: Multiple-Conclusion Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stalnaker, R. C.: Complex predicates, The Monist 60 (1977), 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tichý, P.: On Popper's definitions of verisimilitude, British J. Philos. Sci. 27 (1974), 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  33. van Fraassen, B.: Facts and tautological entailments, J. Philos. 66 (1969), 477–487.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wollheim, R.: F. H. Bradley, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Humberstone, L. False Though Partly True – An Experiment in Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32, 613–665 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LOGI.0000003922.76154.69

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LOGI.0000003922.76154.69

Navigation