Skip to main content
Log in

Inverses for Normal Modal Operators

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given a 1-ary sentence operator ○, we describe L - another 1-ary operator - as as a left inverse of ○ in a given logic if in that logic every formula ϕ is provably equivalent to L○ϕ. Similarly R is a right inverse of ○ if ϕ is always provably equivalent to ○Rϕ. We investigate the behaviour of left and right inverses for ○ taken as the □ operator of various normal modal logics, paying particular attention to the conditions under which these logics are conservatively extended by the addition of such inverses, as well as to the question of when, in such extensions, the inverses behave as normal modal operators in their own right.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BELNAP, N. D., 1962, ‘Tonk, Plonk, and Plink’, Analysis 22, 130–134.

    Google Scholar 

  2. VAN BENTHEM, J., 1984, ‘Correspondence Theory’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. II, 167–247, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  3. CHELLAS, B. F., 1980, Modal Logic: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  4. HENDRY, H. E., 1981, ‘Does IPC Have a Binary Indigenous Sheffer Function?’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22, 183–186.

    Google Scholar 

  5. HOWIE, J. M., 1976, An Introduction to Semigroup Theory, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. HUGHES, G. E., and M. J. CRESSWELL, 1984, A Companion to Modal Logic, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  7. KOSLOW, A., 1992, A Structuralist Theory of Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. KRIPKE, S. A., 1963, ‘Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I. Normal Modal Propositional Calculi’, Zeitschrift für math. Logik und Grundlagen der Math. 9, 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  9. LEMMON, E. J., (with D. S. SCOTT), 1977, An Introduction to Modal Logic (ed. K. Segerberg), American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series (#11), Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  10. PAHI, B., 1971, ‘Full Models and Restricted Extensions of Propositional Calculi’, Zeitschrift für math. Logik und Grundlagen der Math. 17, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. SAHLQVIST, H., 1975, ‘Completeness and Correspondence in the First and Second Order Semantics for Modal Logic’, in S. Kanger (ed.) Procs. Third Scandinavian Logic Symposium, 110–143 Uppsala 1973, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  12. SEGERBERG, K., 1986, ‘Modal Logics with Functional Alternative Relations’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27, 504–522.

    Google Scholar 

  13. SmoryŃski, C., 1985, Self-Reference and Modal Logic, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. WILLIAMSON, T., 1988, ‘Assertion, Denial, and Some Cancellation Rules in Modal Logic’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 17, 299–318.

    Google Scholar 

  15. WILLIAMSON, T., 1990, ‘Verification, Falsification, and Cancellation in KT’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31, 286–290.

    Google Scholar 

  16. WILLIAMSON, T., 1990, ‘Two Incomplete Anti-Realist Modal Epistemic Logics’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 55, 297–314.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Humberstone, L., Williamson, T. Inverses for Normal Modal Operators. Studia Logica 59, 33–64 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004995316790

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004995316790

Navigation