Skip to main content
Log in

A Path from the Quantization of the Action Variable to Quantum Mechanical Formalism

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Starting from the quantization of the action variable as a basic principle, I show that this leads one to the probabilistic description of physical quantities as random variables, which satisfy the uncertainty relation. Using such variables I show that the ensemble-averaged action variable in the quantum domain can be presented as a contour integral of a “quantum momentum function,” pq(z), which is assumed to be analytic. The condition that all bound states pq(z) must yield the quantized values of the action variable requires the equation for pq(z) to be the Riccati differential equation, which can be converted to the Schrödinger equation for the wave function. The rule for probabilities in quantum mechanics follows from the physical meaning of pq(z) and its connection with the probability density. The discussion involves the correspondence principle and the assumption that the spacetime symmetries known in classical physics are valid in the quantum domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. See, e.g., M. Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1966), pp. 91–93.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, e.g., J. B. Keller, Ann. Phys. 4, 180 (1958); M. Brack and R. K. Bhaduri, Semiclassical Physics (Addison–Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1997), pp. 70–71, 77.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See the works of Born, Kramers, and Heisenberg in the collection of reprints, B. L. Van Der Waerden, ed., Sources of Quantum Mechanics (Dover, New York, 1967).

  4. G. Wentzel, Z. Phys. 38, 518 (1926); see also Ref. 1, p. 278.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Leacock and M. Padgett, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2491 (1983). Recently their method was extended to the relativistic domain in M.–J. Kim and C.–K. Choi, Phys. Lett. A 182, 184 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. In some form the quantization of the AV was considered already by M. Planck in his lectures in 1906; see M. Planck, The Theory of Heat Radiation (Tomash, Los Angelos, 1988), p. 404.

  7. See, in this connection, A. Einstein, Kaizo (Japan) 4(22), 1–8 (1922).

    Google Scholar 

  8. See also W. Heisenberg, The Physical Principles of Quantum Theory (Dover, New York, 1949), p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, e.g., L. F. Abbot and Mark B. Wise, Am. J. Phys. 49, 37 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See, e.g., E. Nelson, Phys. Rev. 150, 1079 (1966); Quantum Fluctuations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1985). F. Guerra, Phys. Rep. 77(3), 263 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. L. Ince, Ordinary Differential Equations (Dover, New York, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Morse and H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics (Mc Graw–Hill, New York, 1953), pp. 721–724.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1970), Chap. 4, pp. 35–52, and Chap. 8, pp. 139–171.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Takabayasi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 8, 143 (1952). T. G. Wallstrom, Phys. Rev. A 49, 1613 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Cohen, Found. Phys. 18, 983 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See L. Cohen, Phys. Lett. A 212, 315 (1996) and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hushwater, V. A Path from the Quantization of the Action Variable to Quantum Mechanical Formalism. Foundations of Physics 28, 167–184 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018796618389

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018796618389

Keywords

Navigation