Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Strategy in Multinational Enterprises: Antecedents and Value Creation

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we examine the relationship of the multinational firm’s market environment, stakeholders, resources, and values to the development of strategic social planning and strategic social positioning. Using a sample of multinational enterprises in Mexico, we examine the relationship of these different ways of conducting social strategy to the creation of value by the firm. The market conditions of munificence and dynamism, and the resource for continuous innovation are found to be related to strategic social positioning. The social responsibility orientation of the firm is related to strategic social planning. Positioning is related to value creation for the multinational firm, but planning is not. We discuss the implications of these findings for research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abaroa R. M. (1999) Towards 2005: Profits, People, and the Future of the Regulatory State in the Free Market Model. Law and Policy in International Business 30:131–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Agle B. R., R. K. Mitchell, J. A. Sonnenfeld (1999) Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values. Academy of Management Journal 42(5):507–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert S., D. A. Whetten (1985) Organizational Identity. Research in Organizational Behavior 7:263–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich H. E. (1979) Organizations and Environments. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M., P. O. Berg (1992) Corporate Culture and Organizational Symbolism: An Overview. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews K. (1987) A Concept of Corporate Strategy. 3rd edn, Irwin, Homewood, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff H. I. (1991) Critique of Henry Mintzberg’s the Design School: Reconsidering the Basic Premises of Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 12(6):449–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong J. S., T. S. Overton (1977) Estimating Non-Response Bias in Mail Surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 18(3):396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin J. E. (1990) Managing in Developing Countries. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Banco de México: 2003, Información financiera y económica: Indicadores económicos y financieros [internet document] http://www.banxico.org.mx/cgi_inveco/sibamexbd. exe. (accessed 2 December 2003)

  • Bansal P., K. Roth (2000) Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 43(4):717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J. B. (1986) Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? Academy of Management Review 11(3):656–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 17:99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron D. P. (1995) Integrated Strategy: Market and Non-Market Components. California Management Review 37(2):47–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman S. L., A. C. Wicks, S. Kotha, T. M. Jones (1999) Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? the Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal 42(5):488–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger A. M., B. J. Nalebuff (1995) The Right Game: Use Game Theory to Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review 73(4):57–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Breyer S. (1982) Regulation and its Reform. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke L., J. M. Logsdon (1996) How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays off. Long Range Planning 29:495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business for Social Responsibility: (2003) [internet document] http://www.bsr.org/Meta/About/index.cfm (accessed 3 December 2003)

  • Cochran P.L., R. A. Wood (1984) Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal 27(1):42–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collis D. J., C. A. Montgomery (1995) Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review 73(4):118–129

    Google Scholar 

  • De Geus A. (1988) Planning as Learning. Harvard Business Review 66(2):70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Dess G. G., D. W. Beard (1984) Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 29:52–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt K. (2000) Dynamic Capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21:1105–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esty D. (1999) Toward Optimal Environmental Governance. New York University Law Review 74(6):1495–1574

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun C., C. Shanley (1990) What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Review 33(2):233–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R. E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Frooman J. (1999) Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Review 24(2):191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal S., P. Moran (1996) Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory. Academy of Management Journal 21:13–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali D. R. (1996) Corporate Social Performance: An International Perspective. Advances in International Comparative Management 11:251–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Goll I. (1991) Environment, Corporate Ideology, and Employee Involvement Programs. Industrial Relations 30:138–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goll, I. and Sambharya R.B.: 1990, ‹The Effect of Organizational Culture and Leadership on Firm Performance’, in P. Shrivastava and R. Lamb (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 6 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) pp. 183–200

  • Goll I., Sambharya R. B. (1995) Corporate Ideology, Diversification and Firm Performance. Organization Studies 16(5):823–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goll I., Zeitz G. (1991) Conceptualizing and Measuring Corporate Ideology. Organization Studies 12(2):191–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R. M. (2002) Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin J. J., Mahon J. F. (1997) The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business & Society 36(1):5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair J. F. Jr., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, W. C. Black (1992) Multivariate Data Analysis. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall R. (1993) The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources. Strategic Management Journal 13(2):135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick D. C., P. A. Mason (1984) Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review 9(2):193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G., C. K. Prahalad (1989) Strategic Intent. Harvard Business Review 67(3):63–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris-Interactive: 2003, Reputation quotient: Benefits. [internet document] http://www.harrisinteractive.com/ pop__up/rq/benefits.asp (accessed 3 December 2003).

  • Henriques I., P. Sadorsky (1999) The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance. Academy of Management Journal 42(1):87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman A. J., G. D. Keim (2001) Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line?. Strategic Management Journal 22(2):125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1984) Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist 39(4):341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter R. M. (1999) From Spare Change to Real Change. Harvard Business Review 77(3):122–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats B. W., M. A. Hitt (1988) A Causal Model of Linkage Among Environmental Variables. Academy of Management Journal 31(3):570–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn C. et al. (1952) Values and Value-Orientations in the Theory of Action. in T. Parsons, E. A. Shils (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action. (pp. 388–433). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka J. M. (2000) In Defense of Strategy as Design. California Management Review 42(3):8–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I., O. C. Ferrell, G. T. M. Hult (1999) Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27(4):455–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis J. D., J. W. Walsh (2001) People and Profits? The Search for a Link Between a Firm’s Social and Financial Performance. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A., D. Siegel (2000) Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?. Strategic Management Journal 21:603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon A., A. Menon (1997) Enviropreneurial Marketing Strategy: The Emergence of Corporate Environmentalism as Market Strategy. Journal of Marketing 61:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles R. E., H. J. Coleman Jr., W. E. D. Creed (1995) Keys to Success in Corporate Redesign. California Management Review 37(3):128–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R.E. and W.E.D. Creed: 1995, ‹Organizational Forms and Managerial Philosophies: A Descriptive and Analytical Review’, in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 17, ( JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) pp. 333–372.

  • Miller D. (1988) The Relationship of Porter’s Business Strategies to Environment and Structure. Academy of Management Journal 31:280–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H. (1990) The Design School: Reconsidering the Basic Premises of Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 11(3):171–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R. K., B. R. Agle, D. J. Wood (1997) Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4):853–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally J. C., I. H. Bernstein (1994) Psychometric Theory (3rd edn.) McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly C. A. III, J. Pfeffer (2000) Hidden Value: How Great Companies Achieve Extraordinary Results with Ordinary People. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer K., W. E. Oates, P. R. Portney (1995) Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost Paradigm or the No-Cost Paradigm?. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4):119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M.: 1979, ‹On Studying Organizational Cultures’, Administrative Science Quarterly 24, 570–581

  • Pfeffer J., G. R. Salancik (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, Publishers, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff P. M., D. W. Organ (1986) Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management 12:531–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. E. (1980) Competitive Strategy. The Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. E. (1985) Competitive Advantage. The Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad C. K., R. A. Bettis (1986) The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage Between Diversity and Performance. Strategic Management Journal 7:485–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Post J. E., L. E. Preston, S. Sachs (2002) Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Priem R. L., J. E. Butler (2001) Is The Resource-Based “View” A Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research?. Academy of Management Review 26(1):22–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt F. (1999) Market Failure and the Environmental Policies of Firms: Economic Rationales for “Beyond Compliance” Behavior. Journal of Industrial Ecology 3(1):9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth K., D. M. Schweiger, A. J. Morrison (1991) Global Strategy Implementation at the Business Unit Level: Operational Capabilities and Administrative Mechanisms. Journal of International Business Studies 22(3):369–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley T. (1997) Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Academy of Management Review 22:887–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo M. V., P. A. Fouts (1997) A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40:534–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampler J. (1998) Redefining Industry Structure for the Information Age. Strategic Management Journal 19:343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage G. T., T. H. Nix, C. J. Whitehead, J. D. Blair (1991) Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive 5(2):61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharfman M. P., T. S. Pinkston, T. D. Sigerstad (2000) The Effects of Managerial Values on Social Issues Evaluation: An Empirical Examination. Business & Society 39(2):144–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S. (2000) Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy. Academy of Management Journal 43(4):681–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S., Pablo A. L., H. Vredenburg (1999) Corporate Environmental Responsiveness Strategies: The Importance of Issue Interpretation and Organizational Context. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 35(1):87–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S., H. Vredenburg (1998) Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and the Development of Competitively Valuable Environmental Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19:729–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. A. (1976) Administrative Behavior. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons T., P. Ingram (1997) Organization and Ideology: Kibbutzim and Hired Labor, 1951–1965. Administrative Science Quarterly 42:784–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw B. W., E. Szwajkowski (1975) The Scarcity-Munificence Component of Organization Environments and the Commission of Illegal Acts. Administrative Science Quarterly 20:345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe K., G. Huber (1998) Firm and Industry Determinants of Executive Perceptions of the Environment. Strategic Management Journal 19:793–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trice H. M., J. M. Beyer (1993) The Cultures of Work Organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman A. H. (1985) Data In Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of US Firms. Academy of Management Review 10(3):540–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock S. A., S. B. Graves (1997) The Corporate Social Performance––Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4):303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White H. (1980) A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimatory and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan W. Husted.

Additional information

Bryan W. Husted is a professor of management at the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (Mexico) and Alumni Association Chair of Business Ethics at the Instituto de Empresa (Spain). His research focuses on corporate social and environmental management. His work has appeared in such publications as the Journal of Management Studies, Organization Science, and the Journal of Business Ethics.

David B. Allen is a professor of strategy at the Instituto de Empresa (Spain). He received an MBA from New York University and his M.F.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Iowa. His research focuses on non-market strategy. His work has appeared in such publications as the Journal of International Business Studies and the Journal of Business Ethics. He has consulted extensively for European and American multinational firms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Husted, B.W., Allen, D.B. Corporate Social Strategy in Multinational Enterprises: Antecedents and Value Creation. J Bus Ethics 74, 345–361 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9511-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9511-4

Keywords

Navigation