Abstract
Rights, autonomy, privacy, and confidentialityare concepts commonly used in discussionsconcerning genetic information. When theseconcepts are thought of as denoting absolutenorms and values which cannot be overriden byother considerations, conflicts among themnaturally occur.In this paper, these and related notions areexamined in terms of the duties and obligationsmedical professionals and their clients canhave regarding genetic knowledge. It issuggested that while the prevailing idea ofautonomy is unhelpful in the analysis of theseduties, and the ensuing rights, an alternativereading of personal self-determination canprovide a firmer basis for ethical guidelinesand policies in this field.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Corbin AL. Legal analysis and terminology. Yale Law Journal 1919; 29: 163–173.
Hohfeld W. Fundamental Legal Conceptions. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1923.
Feinberg J. Social Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Häyry M. Liberal Utilitarianism and Applied Ethics. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.
McGleenan T. The jurisprudence of genetic privacy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1998; 1: 225–233.
Hakker H. Ethical responsibility in prenatal genetic diagnosis. Biomedical Ethics 1997; 2: 78–85.
Vehmas, S. Just ignore it: Parents and genetic information (this issue).
Hoedemaekers R. ten Have H. Commercialisation of genetic diagnostic services. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1998; 1: 217–224.
Häyry M. Takala T. Commercial genetic testing and the right to know. In: Takala T, Genes, Sense and Sensibility: Philosophical Studies on the Ethics of Modern Biotechnologies. Helsinki: Reprotalo, 2000: 87–105; and in Häyry M. Playing God: Essays on Bioethics. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 2001: 101–122.
Rhodes R. Genetic links, family ties, and social bonds: rights and responsibilities in the face of genetic knowledge. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1998; 23: 10–30.
Somerville A. English V. Genetic privacy: orthodoxy or oxymoron? Journal of Medical Ethics 1999; 25: 144–150.
Harris J. Keywood K. Ignorance, information and autonomy (this issue).
Takala T. The right to genetic ignorance confirmed. Bioethics 1999; 13: 288–293.
Takala T. Häyry M. Genetic ignorance, moral obligations and social duties. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2000; 25: 107–113.
Dworkin R. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.
Thomson AK. Chadwick RF. Genetic Information: Acquisition, Access, and Control. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 1999.
Harris J. Clones, Genes, and Immortality. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Knoppers BM. Who should have access to genetic information? In: Burley J, ed. The Genetic Revolution and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, 39–53.
Brandeis S. Warren S. The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 1890; 4: 193–221.
Prosser W. Privacy. California Law Review 1960; 48: 383–416.
Parker M. Genetics and the interpersonal elaboration of ethics (this issue).
Slater v. Baker & Stapleton, 95 Eng. Rep. 860 (K.B. 1767).
Kirby MD. Informed consent: what does it mean? Journal of Medical Ethics 1983; 9: 69–75.
Katz J. Informed consent in therapeutic relationship: II. Legal and ethical aspects. In: Reich WT, ed. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. New York: The Free Press, 1978.
Appelbaum PS. Lidz CW. Meisel A. Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 105 N.E. 92, 93 (NY 1914).
Doudera AE. Informed consent: How much should the patient know? In: Basson MD, ed. Rights and Responsibilities in Modern Medicine. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc., 1981.
Natanson v. Kline, 186 Kan. 393, 350 P.2d 1093 (1960); 187 Kan. 186, 354 P2d 670 (1960).
Annas G. Rights of Hospital Patients. New York: Avon Books, 1975.
The Nuremberg Code. Reprinted in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Trials under Control Council Law 10, 2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949: 181–182.
Macklin R. Universality of the nuremberg code. In: Annas G and Grodin M, eds The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992: 240–257.
Council of Europe. Convention for Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Biomedicine: Convention of Human Rights and Biomedicine. European Treaties, ETS No. 164, 1997.
Barker JH. Polcrack L. Respect for persons, informed consent and the assessment of infectious disease risks in xenotransplantation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2001; 4: 53–70.
Gillon R. Philosophical Medical Ethics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.
Mason JK. McCall Smith RA. Law and Medical Ethics. Fifth edition. London: Butterworths, 1999.
Laurie G. In defence of ignorance: genetic information and the right not to know. European Journal of Health Law 1999; 6: 119–132.
World Medical Association. International Code of Medical Ethics, 1949. Reprinted in Ethical Codes and Declarations Relevant to Health Professions. London: Amnesty International Publications, 1994.
Holm S. The privacy of Tutankhamen - utilising the genetic information in stored tissue samples (this issue).
Bennett R. Antenatal genetic testing and the right to remain in ignorance (this issue).
Brandt RB. The morality of abortion. In Perkins RL, ed. Abortion: Pro and Con. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman, 1974: 166.
Rhodes R. Abortion and assent. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1999; 8: 416–427.
White MT. Making responsible decisions: An interpretive ethics for genetic decisionmaking. Hastings Center Report 1999; 29: 14–21.
Rentmeester CA. Value neutrality in genetic counseling: An unattained ideal. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2001; 41: 47–51.
Rendtorff JD. The second international conference about bioethics and biolaw: European principles in bioethics and biolaw. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1998; 1: 271–274.
Kant I. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (1797). Translated by Ladd J, and reprinted in Kant I. Metaphysical Elements of Justice. Second edition. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1999.
Kant I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (1785). Translated by Ellington JW, and reprinted in Kant I. Ethical Philosophy. Second edition. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1994.
Takala T. Genetic ignorance and reasonable paternalism (this issue).
Mill JS. On Liberty (1859). Reprinted in Mill JS. On Liberty and The Subjection of Women. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth, 1996.
Mill JS. Utilitarianism (1861). Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1979.
Human Genetics Advisory Commission. The Implications of Genetic Testing for Insurance. December 1997.