Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic Information, Rights, and Autonomy

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rights, autonomy, privacy, and confidentialityare concepts commonly used in discussionsconcerning genetic information. When theseconcepts are thought of as denoting absolutenorms and values which cannot be overriden byother considerations, conflicts among themnaturally occur.In this paper, these and related notions areexamined in terms of the duties and obligationsmedical professionals and their clients canhave regarding genetic knowledge. It issuggested that while the prevailing idea ofautonomy is unhelpful in the analysis of theseduties, and the ensuing rights, an alternativereading of personal self-determination canprovide a firmer basis for ethical guidelinesand policies in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Corbin AL. Legal analysis and terminology. Yale Law Journal 1919; 29: 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hohfeld W. Fundamental Legal Conceptions. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feinberg J. Social Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Häyry M. Liberal Utilitarianism and Applied Ethics. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McGleenan T. The jurisprudence of genetic privacy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1998; 1: 225–233.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hakker H. Ethical responsibility in prenatal genetic diagnosis. Biomedical Ethics 1997; 2: 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vehmas, S. Just ignore it: Parents and genetic information (this issue).

  8. Hoedemaekers R. ten Have H. Commercialisation of genetic diagnostic services. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1998; 1: 217–224.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Häyry M. Takala T. Commercial genetic testing and the right to know. In: Takala T, Genes, Sense and Sensibility: Philosophical Studies on the Ethics of Modern Biotechnologies. Helsinki: Reprotalo, 2000: 87–105; and in Häyry M. Playing God: Essays on Bioethics. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 2001: 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rhodes R. Genetic links, family ties, and social bonds: rights and responsibilities in the face of genetic knowledge. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1998; 23: 10–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Somerville A. English V. Genetic privacy: orthodoxy or oxymoron? Journal of Medical Ethics 1999; 25: 144–150.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harris J. Keywood K. Ignorance, information and autonomy (this issue).

  13. Takala T. The right to genetic ignorance confirmed. Bioethics 1999; 13: 288–293.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takala T. Häyry M. Genetic ignorance, moral obligations and social duties. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2000; 25: 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dworkin R. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomson AK. Chadwick RF. Genetic Information: Acquisition, Access, and Control. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harris J. Clones, Genes, and Immortality. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knoppers BM. Who should have access to genetic information? In: Burley J, ed. The Genetic Revolution and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brandeis S. Warren S. The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 1890; 4: 193–221.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prosser W. Privacy. California Law Review 1960; 48: 383–416.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parker M. Genetics and the interpersonal elaboration of ethics (this issue).

  22. Slater v. Baker & Stapleton, 95 Eng. Rep. 860 (K.B. 1767).

  23. Kirby MD. Informed consent: what does it mean? Journal of Medical Ethics 1983; 9: 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Katz J. Informed consent in therapeutic relationship: II. Legal and ethical aspects. In: Reich WT, ed. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. New York: The Free Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Appelbaum PS. Lidz CW. Meisel A. Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 105 N.E. 92, 93 (NY 1914).

  27. Doudera AE. Informed consent: How much should the patient know? In: Basson MD, ed. Rights and Responsibilities in Modern Medicine. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Natanson v. Kline, 186 Kan. 393, 350 P.2d 1093 (1960); 187 Kan. 186, 354 P2d 670 (1960).

  29. Annas G. Rights of Hospital Patients. New York: Avon Books, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  30. The Nuremberg Code. Reprinted in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Trials under Control Council Law 10, 2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949: 181–182.

  31. Macklin R. Universality of the nuremberg code. In: Annas G and Grodin M, eds The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992: 240–257.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Council of Europe. Convention for Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Biomedicine: Convention of Human Rights and Biomedicine. European Treaties, ETS No. 164, 1997.

  33. Barker JH. Polcrack L. Respect for persons, informed consent and the assessment of infectious disease risks in xenotransplantation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2001; 4: 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gillon R. Philosophical Medical Ethics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mason JK. McCall Smith RA. Law and Medical Ethics. Fifth edition. London: Butterworths, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Laurie G. In defence of ignorance: genetic information and the right not to know. European Journal of Health Law 1999; 6: 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  37. World Medical Association. International Code of Medical Ethics, 1949. Reprinted in Ethical Codes and Declarations Relevant to Health Professions. London: Amnesty International Publications, 1994.

  38. Holm S. The privacy of Tutankhamen - utilising the genetic information in stored tissue samples (this issue).

  39. Bennett R. Antenatal genetic testing and the right to remain in ignorance (this issue).

  40. Brandt RB. The morality of abortion. In Perkins RL, ed. Abortion: Pro and Con. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman, 1974: 166.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rhodes R. Abortion and assent. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1999; 8: 416–427.

    Google Scholar 

  42. White MT. Making responsible decisions: An interpretive ethics for genetic decisionmaking. Hastings Center Report 1999; 29: 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rentmeester CA. Value neutrality in genetic counseling: An unattained ideal. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2001; 41: 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rendtorff JD. The second international conference about bioethics and biolaw: European principles in bioethics and biolaw. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1998; 1: 271–274.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kant I. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (1797). Translated by Ladd J, and reprinted in Kant I. Metaphysical Elements of Justice. Second edition. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1999.

  46. Kant I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (1785). Translated by Ellington JW, and reprinted in Kant I. Ethical Philosophy. Second edition. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1994.

  47. Takala T. Genetic ignorance and reasonable paternalism (this issue).

  48. Mill JS. On Liberty (1859). Reprinted in Mill JS. On Liberty and The Subjection of Women. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth, 1996.

  49. Mill JS. Utilitarianism (1861). Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Human Genetics Advisory Commission. The Implications of Genetic Testing for Insurance. December 1997.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Häyry, M., Takala, T. Genetic Information, Rights, and Autonomy. Theor Med Bioeth 22, 403–414 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013097617552

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013097617552

Navigation