Skip to main content
Log in

Cooperation and Competition in the Context of Organic and Mechanic Worldviews – A Theoretical and Case based Discussion

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we argue that there is an interconnection between; the mechanistic worldview and competition, and the organic worldview and cooperation. To illustrate our main thesis we introduce two cases; first, Max Havelaar, a paradigmatic case of how business might function in an economy based upon solidarity and sustainability. Second, TINE, a Norwegian grocery corporation engaged in collusion in order to force a small competitor out of the market. On the one hand, in order to encourage market behaviour that integrates economic, societal and environmental values we find that transparent cooperation within a context of an organic worldview takes care of important intrinsic as well as instrumental values. On the other hand, we find evidence for asserting that cooperation based upon a mechanistic worldview, typically leads to group egotistical consequences undermining the long term common good.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allinson R. B. (2004). Circles within a Circle: The Condition for the Possibility of Ethical Business Institutions within a Market System. Journal of Business Ethics 53:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, F. and J. Waters: 1989, ‘The Moral Muteness of Managers’, California Management Review, Fall, pp. 73–88.

  • Boda, Z.: 2001, ‘Conflicting Principles of Fair Trade’, Business Ethics Papers No. 3, (Business Ethics Center, Budapest University of Economic Sciences).

  • Brinkmann J. and Ims K. (2004). A Conflict Case Approach to Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 53:123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calkins M. (2001). Casuistry and the Business Case Method. Business Ethics Quarterly 11:237–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly H. E. and Cobb J., Jr. (1994). For the Common Good - Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witt B. and Meyer R. (1998). Strategy, Process, Content, Context. An International Perspective. International Thomson Business Press, London, 2nd Edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E. (1973). On Morality and Society. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E. (1991). The Division of Labour in Society. MacMillan Press Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • EU: http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/competition/publications/consumer

  • Frey B. (2000). The Impact of Moral Intensity on Decision Making in a Business Context. Journal of Business Ethics 26:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N. (1971). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson C. (1988). Om føretag, moral, och handling. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. (1982). A Reply to my Critics. In: Thompson J., Held D. (eds) J. Habermas, Critical Debates. Macmillan Press, Cambridge Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. The MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. (1991) Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue – Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16:366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen J. (2002) The Dominant Economics Paradigm and Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9:67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunde J. (1967). Etiske normer i næringslivet. Forbrukerorientert markedsetikk. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore G. (2004). The Fair Trade Movement: Parameters, Issues and Future Research. Journal of Business Ethics 53:73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norges offentlige utredninger: 2002, Avfallsforebygging - En visjon om livskvalitet, forbrukerbevissthet og kretsløpstenkning (NOU 2002:19, Oslo)

  • Norwegian Competition Authority: 2004, Konkurransemessig vurdering av ordninger for produktgjenvinning (Oslo).

  • OECD: http://www.oecd.org/about/

  • Porter, M. and C. van der Linde: 1995, ‘Green and Competitive – Ending the Stalemate’, Harvard Business Review Sept.–Oct., pp. 120–134.

  • Ruyter, K. W.: 1995, Kasuistikk som saksbasert problemløsning (Doctoral Dissertation, School of Theology, University of Oslo)

  • Smith A. (1976). An Inquiry into the nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations. In: Cannan E. (eds), Two Volumes in One (first edition 1776, the citations are from the 5th Edition). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1985). Human Agency and Language, Philosophical Papers 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • TINE: http//www.tine.no

  • Tranøy K. E. (1999). Det åpne sinn., Moral og etikk mot et nytt årtusen (The Open Mind. Morality and Ethics Towards a New Millennium. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford R. (1995). Environmental Strategy and Sustainable Development. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford R. (2000). Corporate Environmental Management – Towards Sustainable Management. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead A. N. (1967a). Science and the Modern World. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead A. N. (1967b). Adventures of Ideas. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead A. N. (1985). Process and Reality. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Knut J. Ims.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ims, K.J., Jakobsen, O.D. Cooperation and Competition in the Context of Organic and Mechanic Worldviews – A Theoretical and Case based Discussion. J Bus Ethics 66, 19–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9055-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9055-z

Keywords

Navigation