Skip to main content
Log in

Is Quantum Suicide Painless? On an Apparent Violation of the Principal Principle

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The experimental setup of the self-referential quantum measurement, jovially known as the ‘quantum suicide’ or the ‘quantum Russian roulette’ is analyzed from the point of view of the Principal Principle of David Lewis. It is shown that the apparent violation of this principle – relating objective probabilities and subjective chance – in this type of thought experiment is just an illusion due to the usage of some terms and concepts ill-defined in the quantum context. We conclude that even in the case that Everett’s (or some other ‘no-collapse’) theory is a correct description of reality, we can coherently believe in equating subjective credence with objective chance in quantum-mechanical experiments. This is in agreement with results of the research on personal identity in the quantum context by Parfit and Tappenden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • N. Bostrom (2001) Synthese 127 359 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010350925053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Bostrom (2002) Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects Routledge New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Deutsch (1985) International Journal of the Theoretical Physics 24 1 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00670071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Everett SuffixIII (1957) Reviews of Modern Physics 29 454 Occurrence Handle10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.C. Ghirardi A. Rimini T. Weber (1986) Physical Review D 34 470 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevD.34.470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1986) Philosophical Papers Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (2004) Australasian Journals of Philosophy 82 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • P.J. Lewis (2000) Analysis 60 22–29 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8284.00198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H.P. Moravec (1988) Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence Harvard University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Papineau (2003) Analysis 63 51–58 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.0003-2638.2003.00395.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Papineau (2004) Australasian Journals of Philosophy 82 153–169

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Parfit (1984) Reasons and Persons Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Price (1996) Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires E. (1986). The Mystery of the Quantum World. Bristol Institute of Physics Publishing.

  • Tappenden, P. (2000). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51–99.

  • P. Tappenden (2004) Analysis 64 157–164 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1467-8284.2004.00478.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Tegmark (1998) Fortschritte der Physik 46 855 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1521-3978(199811)46:6/8<855::AID-PROP855>3.0.CO;2-Q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vranas, P.: 1998, In Sixteenth Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Kansas City, Missouri.

  • D. Zeh (1992) The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time Springer-Verlag Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milan M. Ćirković.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ćirković, M.M. Is Quantum Suicide Painless? On an Apparent Violation of the Principal Principle. Found Sci 11, 287–296 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-004-6249-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-004-6249-7

Keywords

Navigation