Abstract
The experimental setup of the self-referential quantum measurement, jovially known as the ‘quantum suicide’ or the ‘quantum Russian roulette’ is analyzed from the point of view of the Principal Principle of David Lewis. It is shown that the apparent violation of this principle – relating objective probabilities and subjective chance – in this type of thought experiment is just an illusion due to the usage of some terms and concepts ill-defined in the quantum context. We conclude that even in the case that Everett’s (or some other ‘no-collapse’) theory is a correct description of reality, we can coherently believe in equating subjective credence with objective chance in quantum-mechanical experiments. This is in agreement with results of the research on personal identity in the quantum context by Parfit and Tappenden.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. Bostrom (2001) Synthese 127 359 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010350925053
N. Bostrom (2002) Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects Routledge New York
D. Deutsch (1985) International Journal of the Theoretical Physics 24 1 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00670071
H. Everett SuffixIII (1957) Reviews of Modern Physics 29 454 Occurrence Handle10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454
G.C. Ghirardi A. Rimini T. Weber (1986) Physical Review D 34 470 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevD.34.470
D. Lewis (1986) Philosophical Papers Oxford University Press New York
D. Lewis (2004) Australasian Journals of Philosophy 82 3–22
P.J. Lewis (2000) Analysis 60 22–29 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8284.00198
H.P. Moravec (1988) Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence Harvard University Press Cambridge
D. Papineau (2003) Analysis 63 51–58 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.0003-2638.2003.00395.x
D. Papineau (2004) Australasian Journals of Philosophy 82 153–169
D. Parfit (1984) Reasons and Persons Oxford University Press Oxford
H. Price (1996) Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point Oxford University Press Oxford
Squires E. (1986). The Mystery of the Quantum World. Bristol Institute of Physics Publishing.
Tappenden, P. (2000). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51–99.
P. Tappenden (2004) Analysis 64 157–164 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1467-8284.2004.00478.x
M. Tegmark (1998) Fortschritte der Physik 46 855 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1521-3978(199811)46:6/8<855::AID-PROP855>3.0.CO;2-Q
Vranas, P.: 1998, In Sixteenth Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Kansas City, Missouri.
D. Zeh (1992) The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time Springer-Verlag Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ćirković, M.M. Is Quantum Suicide Painless? On an Apparent Violation of the Principal Principle. Found Sci 11, 287–296 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-004-6249-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-004-6249-7