Skip to main content
Log in

Agriculture in the Slovenian Transitional Economy: The Preservation of Genetic Diversity of Plants and Ethical Consequences

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Slovene agriculture is going throughdrastic changes. Most of the land is stillowned by small farmers. The production isoriented to the market and is based on modernWestern technology. It is associated withincreasing pollution and is becoming a seriousthreat to biodiversity. Many of the wild plantsare endangered due to genetic erosion withinspecies. The traditional crops and varietiesare being replaced by imported materials andthe use of chemicals has been increasing. Manyof the traditional varieties have beenneglected and/or lost. The existing germplasmcollections are incomplete and frequently donot include traditional varieties. There areonly a few breeding organizations with limitedcapacities and collections. The legislation isnot efficient enough to protect the environmentand biotic diversity. Schools, media,religious, sport, tourist, and otherorganizations should be more active inpromoting the respect for biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bole, J., B. Drovenik, N. Mrsic, and B. Sket, “Endemic Animals in Hypogean Habitats in Slovenia,” Nase Jame (Our Caves) 35(1) (1993), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cepon, M., F. Habe, A. Holcman, D. Kompan, J. Osterc, J. Pohar, J., Poklukar, Z. Pribozic-Kramar, A. Salehar, M. Zidar, and S. Zgur, Ohranjene slovenske avtohtone zivali (Preserved Slovenian Indigenous Domestic Animals) (Ljubljana, Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning, University of Ljubljana — Biotechnical Faculty, Dept. of Zootechnics (in Slovene), 1999), pp. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerne, M., V. Meglic, J. Verbic, K. Ugrinovic, A. Zemljic, Z. Cergan, D. Koron, P. Dolnicar, B. Koruza, I. Tomazic, and Z. Korosec-Koruza, “Genebank of Agricultural Plants at the Agricultural Institute of Slovenia,” Sodobno kmetijstvo (in Slovene) 32/99 (1999), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, P. F., R. E. Green, and M. F. Heath, “Agricultural Intensification and the Collapse of Europe's Farmland Bird Populations,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London; Series B — Biological Sciences 268(1462) (2001), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, Agriculture, Environment, Rural Development: Facts and Figures — A Challenge for Agriculture (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1999), p. 262.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission — Directorate General for Agriculture, Newsletter, No. 32, March 2001, Brussels.

  • Falconer, D. S., Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn. (Longman, London and New York, 1981), p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, B., “Holy Ganga and the Mighty Amazon,” Amazoniana-Limnologia et Oecologia Regionalis Systemae Fluminis Amazonas 16(3–4) (2001), 337–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, M. A., Biological Diversity. The Coexsistence of Species on Changing Landscapes (University Press, Cambridge, 1994), p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, B. O. and C. E. Stalvant, “The Baltic Basin Case Study — Towards a Sustainable Baltic Europe,” Continental Shelf Research 21(18–19) (2001), 1999–2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotarac, M., Atlas of the Dragonflies of Slovenia, Center za kartografijo favne in flore (Miklavz na Dravskem Polju, 1997), pp. 1–129.

  • Lagerlof, J., B. Goffre, and C. Vincent, “The Importance of Field Boundaries for Earthworms (Lumbricidae) in the Swedish Agricultural Landscape,” Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 89(1–2) (2002) (Sp. Iss.), 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Coer, D., J. Baudry, F. Burel, and C. Thenail, “Why and How We Should Study Field Boundary Biodiversity in an Agrarian Landscape Context,” Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 89(1–2) (2002) (Sp. Iss.), 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemly, A. D., R. T. Kingsford, and J. R. Thompson, “Irrigated Agriculture and Wildlife Conservation: Conflict on a Global Scale,” Environmental Management 25(5), (2000), 485–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, D. and H. Van Dyck, “Butterfly Diversity Loss in Flanders (North Belgium): Europe's Worst Case Scenario?” Biological Conservation 99(3) (2001), 263–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E. J. R. and A. C. Moonen, “Field Margins in Northern Europe: Their Functions and Interactions with Agriculture,” Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 89(1–2) (2002) (Sp. Iss.), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martincic, A., T. Wraber, N. Jogan, V. Ravnik, A. Podobnik, B. Turk, and B. Vres, Mala flora Slovenije (Tehniska zalozba Slovenije, Ljubljana, 1999), pp. 3–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marias, J., History of Philosophy Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1967), p. 295.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J. A., K. R. Miller, W. V. Reid, R. A. Mittermeier, and T. B. Werner, Conserving the World's Biological Diversity (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, World Resources Institute, Conservation International, World Wildlife Fund — US, and the World Bank, 1990), p. 17.

  • MESP. Biodiversity Conservation Strategy of Slovenia (Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning — Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, 2002), pp. 1–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. R. and R. J. Hobbs, “Conservation where People Live and Work,” Conservation Biology 16(2) (2002), 330–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • MKGP, Slovensko kmetijstvo in Evropska unija — Slovene Agriculture and the European Union (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food & Kmecki glas, Ljubljana, 1997), p. 439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrsic, N., F. Potocnik, and R. Novak, “Biodiversity in Slovenia,” in A. Cimerman and N. Gunde-Cimerman (eds.), Biodiversity — International Biodiversity Seminar, ECCO XIV. Meeting (Slovenian National Commission for UNESCO and National Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, 1996), pp. 13–20.

  • Natek, K. and M. Natek, Slovenija (Mladinska Knjiga Publishing House, Ljubljana, 1998), pp. 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • OGRS, Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, Act No. 15-655/76 (Ljubljana, 1976).

  • OGRS, Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 30/96 (Ljubljana, 1996).

  • OGRS, Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, Act No. 56-2655/99 (Ljubljana, 1999).

  • Primack, R. B., A Primer Conservation Biology (Sinauer Associates Inc. Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1995), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, C. S. and T. M. Crowe, “Declining Populations of Helmeted Guineafowl in the Midlands of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A Review of Causes and Remedies,” South African Journal of Wildlife Research 31(3–4) (2001), 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rednak, M., T. Volk, B. Zagorc, and M. Golez, “Stanje v slovenskem kmetijstvu v letu 2000” (Report on Slovene Agricultural Situation in Year 2000), in the Proceedings of the 1st Conference of DAES, 2001, pp. 7–26.

  • Robinson, R. A. and W. J. Sutherland, “Post-War Changes in Arable Farming and Biodiversity in Great Britain,” Journal of Applied Ecology 39(1) (2002), 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V., Tomorrow's Biodiversity (Thames and Hudson Inc., New York, 2000), pp. 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket, B., “Biotic Diversity of Hypogean Habitats in Slovenia and Its Cultural Importance,” in A. Cimerman and N. Gunde-Cimerman (eds.), Biodiversity — International Biodiversity Seminar, ECCO XIV. Meeting (Slovenian National Commission for UNESCO and National Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, 1996), pp. 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • SURS, Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Various issues (Government of the Republic of Slovenia, 2000, 2001).

  • Swanson, T. M., “Why Does Biodiversity Decline? The Analysis of Forces for Global Change,” in T. M. Swanson (ed.), The Economics and Ecology of Biodiversity Decline: The Forces Driving Global Change, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998), pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk, J., “The Institutional Economics Approach in Analyzing the Path of Economic Reform in Slovene Agricultural Production,” Eastern European Economics 39(3) (2001), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk, J. and C. Rozman, “Market Developments and Agricultural Policy Options in Slovenia,” Agrarwirtschaft 50(4) (2001), 262–268.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ivancic, A., Turk, J., Rozman, C. et al. Agriculture in the Slovenian Transitional Economy: The Preservation of Genetic Diversity of Plants and Ethical Consequences. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16, 337–365 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025626000025

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025626000025

Navigation