Abstract
We present an ideal profile of an emerging organizational function: the Ethics Officer. We argue that the main contribution of an EO is to provide management with a broad perspective of the organization's stakeholders – one that emphasizes the interests of all stakeholders, including those not affiliated with the dominant coalitions in the organization. In order to avoid turning the EO into a rubber stamp for management activities, we suggest that certain conditions prevail to enable the person in this position to exercise impartial, independent judgment. These conditions are embodied in our profile, which maintains that an ideal EO should have appropriate organizational status, functional independence, professionalism, knowledge of organizational issues, and knowledge of ethics theory. We suggest that the function of EO may be performed by a professional who is already employed by the organization, and we use the internal auditor as an example.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, N. K.: 1994, ‘The New Corporate Watchdog’, Working Women 19(1), 19–20.
BarNir, A.: 1992, Internal Auditing: Norms and Standards, Work Patterns, and Related Factors (Masters' Thesis, Department of Labor Studies, Tel-Aviv University [Hebrew]).
Barrett, M. J.: 1988, ‘Service to Whom?’ Internal Auditor 45, 27–32.
Byington, J. R. and J. G. Johnston: 1990, ‘Ethics and Internal Auditors: A Controversial Scenario’, Internal Auditor 6(2), 3–11.
Collins, D.: 1989, ‘Organizational Harm, Legal Condemnation, and Stakeholders' Retaliation: A Typology, Research Agenda and Applicaton’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 1–13.
Courtemanche, G.: 1986, The New Internal Auditing (John Wiley, New York).
Finlay, J. R.: 1990, ‘Surivial Ethics’, Business Quarterly 55, 40–44.
Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholders' Approach(Pitman, Marshfield, MA).
Grier, D.: 1989, ‘Confronting Ethical Dilemmas’, Vital Speech 56(4), 100–104.
Institute of Internal Auditing: 1988, ‘IIA Position Paper on Whistleblowing’, Internal Auditor 45, 16; 22.
Izraeli, D. and A. BarNir: 1993, Coping with Ethical Dilemmas: Patterns and Factors Affecting Them Among Internal Auditors(Israel Institute of Business Research, Tel-Aviv University, Research Report [Hebrew], no. 41/93).
Kamm, J.: 1992, ‘The 1992 Ethics Officer Survey Results’, Center for Business Ethics News 1(2).
McNamee, D.: 1991, ‘Resolving Problems in Ethics and Management’, Managerial Auditing Journal 7(2), 3–11.
Petry, E. S. and F. Tietz: 1992, ‘Can Ethics Officers Improve Ethics?’, Business and Society Review 82, 21–25.
Rodriquez, C. M.: 1991, ‘Internal Auditing - True/False - Profession?’ Internal Auditing 7, 93–96.
Sawyer, L. B.: 1988, Sawyer's Internal Auditing (Institute of Internal Auditors, Altamonte Springs, FL).
Scott, W. R.: 1981, Organizations, Rationals, Natural and Open Systems(Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ).
Stocks, K. D. and W. S. Albrecht: 1993, ‘Ethical Dilemmas’, Internal Auditor 50(3), 24–25.
Thompson, C.: 1993, ‘Fraud Findings’, Internal Auditor 50, 64–65.
Thompson, D. F.: 1992, ‘Paradoxes of Government Ethics’, Public Administration Review 52, 254–259.
Verschoor, C. C.: 1987, ‘The Ethical Dilemma’, Internal Auditor 44, 29–31.
Vinten, G.: 1992, ‘Whistleblowing Auditors: The Ultimate Betrayal?’ International Journal of Value Based Management 5, 49–76.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Izraeli, D., BarNir, A. Promoting Ethics Through Ethics Officers: A Proposed Profile and an Application. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1189–1196 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005770732000
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005770732000