Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility and Psychosocial Risk Management in Europe

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a comprehensive concept that aims at the promotion of responsible business practices closely linked to the strategy of enterprises. Although there is no single accepted definition of CSR, it remains an inspiring, challenging and strategic development that is becoming an increasingly important priority for companies of all sizes and types, particularly in Europe. Promotion of well-being at work is an essential component of CSR; however, the link between CSR, working conditions and work organisation is still found to be unfamiliar to stakeholders. As CSR is strategic and is regarded by many companies and corporate leaders as an important development, it offers opportunities for psychosocial risk management, an area that is currently among the top priorities in working environment and well-being at work debates. However, the link between CSR and psychosocial risk management has not been addressed clearly before. This paper aims to explore the potential role of CSR in promoting well-being at work through the development of a framework for the management of psychosocial risks. As part of the research, key stakeholders [including the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Labour Organization (ILO), the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA), the European Commission (EC), employers’ associations, trade unions and other policy experts] across Europe participated in a survey, interviews and focus groups to assess and clarify the link between CSR and psychosocial risk management. On the basis of the findings, a CSR-inspired approach to the management of psychosocial issues at work is proposed. Such an approach can be a useful tool in contexts where, up until now, expertise and tradition in dealing with psychosocial issues have been lacking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blowfield, M., and Frynas, J.G.: 2005, ‘Editorial: Setting New Agendas - Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Developing World’, International Affairs 81(3), 499-513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, K., Matten, D., and Moon, J.: 2004, ‘The adoption of voluntary codes of conduct in MNCs: a three country comparative study’, Business and Society Review 109, 449-478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T., and Griffiths, A.: 2005, ‘The nature and measurement of work-related stress’, in J. Wilson and N. Corlett (eds.), Evaluation of Human Work: A Practical Ergonomics Methodology, 3rd edition, (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL). pp. 553-573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T., Griffiths, A., and Rial-Gonzalez, E.: 2000, ‘Research on work related stress’, (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).

    Google Scholar 

  • CSR Europe.: 2010, ‘A Guide to CSR in Europe: Country Insights by CSR Europe’s National Partner Organisations’, (CSR Europe, Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Martino, V., H. Hoel and C. L. Cooper: 2003, ‘Preventing Violence and Harassment in the Workplace’, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions Dublin.

  • Earle, H.A.: 2003, ‘Building a workplace of choice: Using the work environment to attract and retain top talent’, Journal of Facilities Management, 2(3), 244-257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA): 2002, ‘How to Tackle Psychosocial Issues and Reduce Work-Related Stress’, Report of European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

  • European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA): 2007, ‘Expert Forecast on Emerging Psychosocial Risks Related to Occupational Safety and Health’, European Risk Observatory Report. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

  • European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA): 2009, ‘OSH in Figures: Stress at Work – Facts and Figures’, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

  • European Commission (EC): 2000, ‘Lisbon Special European Council (March 2000): Towards a Europe of Innovation and Knowledge – The Lisbon Strategy’, http://europa.eu/scadplus/glossary/lisbon_strategy_en.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2010.

  • European Commission (EC): 2001, ‘Green Paper: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility’, Official Journal of the European Communities 32 (L183). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp. 1–8.

  • European Commission (EC): 2002a, ‘CSR: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development’, Communication from the European Commission [COM (2002) 347]. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

  • European Commission (EC): 2002b, ‘Guidance on Work-Related Stress – Spice of Life or Kiss of Death?’ Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

  • European Commission (EC): 2004, ‘European Multi-Stakeholder Forum on CSR’, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/csr/forum_2002_04_documents.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2010.

  • European Commission (EC): 2005, ‘A New Start for the Lisbon Strategy’, http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/cha/c11325.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2010.

  • European Commission (EC): 2006, ‘Launch of European Alliance for Corporate Social Responsibility’, [IP/06/358]. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

  • European Commission (EC): 2010, ‘EUROPE 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth’, Communication from the European Commission [COM (2010) 2020]. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

  • European Parliament: 2007, ‘European Parliament Resolution of 13 March 2007 on Corporate Social Responsibility: A New Partnership’ [2006/2133(INI)]. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

  • European Social Partners: 2004, ‘Framework Agreement on Work-Related Stress’, European Social Partners – ETUC, UNICE(BUSINESSEUROPE), UEAPME and CEEP, Brussels.

  • European Social Partners: 2007, ‘Framework Agreement on Harassment and Violence at Work’, European Social Partners – ETUC, UNICE(BUSINESSEUROPE), UEAPME and CEEP, Brussels.

  • Frick, K., and Zwetsloot, G.: 2007, ‘From safety management to corporate citizenship: An overview of approaches to health management’, in U. Johansson, G. Ahonen and R. Roslander (editors), Work Health and Management Control (Stockholm, Thomson Fakta), pp 99-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S., and Milstein, M.: 2003, ‘Creating sustainable value’, Academy of Management Executive 17(2), 56-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health and Safety Executive (HSE): 2005, ‘Promoting Health and Safety as a Key Goal of the Corporate Social Responsibility Agenda’, Research Report 339 (HSE Books, Sudbury).

  • Hopkins, M.: 1997, ‘Defining indicators to assess socially responsible enterprises’, Futures 29(7), 581-603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iavicoli, S., E. Natali, P. Deitinger, B. M. Rondinone, M. Ertel, A. Jain and S. Leka: in press ‘Occupational Health and Safety Policy and Psychosocial Risks in Europe: The Role of Stakeholders’ Perceptions. Health Policy. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.005.

  • Idowu, S.O., and Filho, W.L. (editors): 2009, ‘Global practices of corporate social responsibility’, (Springer, Heidelberg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G., and Apostolakou, A.: 2010, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute?’, Journal of Business Ethics 94, 371-394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok, P., Wielde, T. van der, McKenna, R., and Brown, A.: 2001, ‘A CSR audit within a quality management framework’, Journal of Business Ethics 31, 285-297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, P., Cooper, T., Hayward, R., and Neuberger, L.: 2010, ‘A New Era of Sustainability: UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO Study 2010’, (Accenture, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leka, S., and J. Churchill: 2007, ‘The Responsible Business Agenda: Healthy Workers and Healthy Organisations’, Paper presented at the 13th European Congress of Work and Organisational Psychology, Stockholm, May 9–12, 2007.

  • Leka, S., and Cox, T. (editors).: 2008, ‘The European Framework for Psychosocial Risk Management: PRIMA-EF’, (I-WHO Publications, Nottingham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leka, S., Griffiths, A., and Cox, T.: 2003, ‘Work organisation and stress’, (World Health Organisation, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leka, S., Hassard, J., Jain, A., Makrinov, N., Cox, T., Kortum, E., Ertel, M., Hallsten, L., Iavicoli, S., Lindstrom, K., and Zwetsloot, G.: 2008, ‘Towards the development of a psychosocial risk management framework. SALTSA’, (I-WHO Publications, Nottingham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leka, S., and Jain, A.: 2010, ‘Health Impact of Psychosocial Hazards at Work: An overview’, (World Health Organization, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leka, S., Jain, A., Zwetsloot, G., and Cox, T.: 2010, ‘Policy-level interventions and work-related psychosocial risk management in Europe. Work & Stress 24(3), 298 – 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., and Moon, J.: 2008, ‘Implicit and Explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility’, Academy of Management Review 33(2), 404-424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).: 2002, ‘The changing organization of work and the safety and health of working people: Knowledge gaps and research directions’, (DHHS:NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordestgaard, M., and Kirton-Darling, J.: 2004, ‘Corporate social responsibility within the European sectoral social dialogue’, (ETUI, Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parent-Thirion, A., E. Macías, J. Hurley and G. G. Vermeylen: 2007, ‘Fourth European Working Conditions Survey’, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

  • Segal, J. P., A. Sobczak and C. E. Triomphe: 2003, ‘CSR and Working Conditions’, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

  • Stuebs, M., and Sun, L.: 2010, ‘Business Reputation and Labour Efficiency, productivity and cost’, Journal of Business Ethics 96, 265-283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan-Whitehead, D.: 2003, ‘EU Enlargement versus Social Europe? The uncertain future of the European social model’, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuontisjärvi, T.: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Reporting in the European Context and Human Resource Disclosures: An Analysis of Finnish Companies’, Journal of Business Ethics 69(4), 331-354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwetsloot, G.: 2003, ‘From management systems to corporate social responsibility’, Special issue on Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics 44, 201-207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwetsloot, G. and A. Starren: 2004, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Safety and Health at Work’, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

  • Zwetsloot, G., and van Scheppingen, A.: 2007, ‘Towards a Strategic Business Case for Health Management’, in U. Johansson, G. Ahonen and R. Roslander (editors), Work Health and Management Control, (Thomson Fakta, Stockholm), pp. 183-213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aditya Jain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jain, A., Leka, S. & Zwetsloot, G. Corporate Social Responsibility and Psychosocial Risk Management in Europe. J Bus Ethics 101, 619–633 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0742-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0742-z

Keywords

Navigation