Abstract
Exploring the concept of citizenship from the history of political philosophy provides suggestions about what corporate citizenship could mean. The metaphor of corporate citizenship suggests an institutional approach to corporate social responsibility. Citizenship is a social role, characterized by an orientation towards the social contract, collective and active responsibility, as well as a positive attitude towards the juridical state. By analogy, corporate citizenship is a social role, characterized by the social contract of business, a participatory ethics of business, the precautionary principle and the promotion of just international institutions. It is considered that corporate citizenship depends on a number of interacting institutional conditions that hold society partly responsible for the social performance of their companies. Finally, the problem of the dissolution of corporate social responsibility is reviewed in an institutional environment where everyone is considered responsible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barber, B.: 1984, Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (University of California Press, Berkeley).
Bendell, J.: 2003, ‘Talking for Change: Reflections on Effective Stakeholder Dialogue’, in J. Andrioff, S. Waddock, B. Husted and S. Sutherland (eds.), Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2: Relationships, Communication, Reporting and Performance (Greenleaf, Sheffield), pp. 53–69.
Bovens, M. A. P.: 1990, Verantwoordelijkheid en Organisatie: Beschouwingen Over Aansprakelijkheid, Institutioneel Institutional Conditions of Corporate Citizenship 95 Burgerschap en Ambtelijke Ongehoorzaamheid (Tjeenk Willink, Zwolle).
Daly, H. and K. Townsend: 1996, Valuing the Earth-Economics, Ecology, Ethics, 6th Edition. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
Darley, J. M.: 1996, ‘How Organizations Socialize Individuals into Evildoing’, in D. M. Messick and A. E. Tenbrunsel (eds.), Codes of Conduct: Behavioural Research into Business Ethics (Russel Sage, New York), pp. 13–43.
De George, R.: 1993, Competing With Integrity in International Business (Oxford University Press, New York).
Donaldson, T.: 1982, Corporations and Morality (Prentice Hall, Englewood Clis, NJ).
Dowling, G.: 2001, Creating Corporate Reputations (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
European Commission: 2002, Anticipating and Managing Change: A Dynamic Approach to the Social Aspects of Corporate restructuring, (http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/news/2002/jan/corporate_restructuring_en.pdf).
Feinberg, J.: 1981, ‘The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations’, in E. Partridge (ed.), Responsibilities to Future Generations (Prometheus, Buffalo), pp. 139–150.
Fried, Ch.: 1982, Contract as Promise (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
Gauthier, D.: 1986, Morals by agreement (Clarendon, Oxford).
Gray, B.: 1991, Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
Hegel, G. W. F.: 1972, in H. Reichelt (ed.), Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (Ullstein, Frankfurt am Main, Originally 1821).
Jackall, R. 1988, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Jeurissen, R.: 2000, ‘The Social Function of Business Ethics’, Business Ethics Quarterly 10(4), 821–843.
Jeurissen, R. and G. Keijzers: 2004, ‘Future Generations and Business Ethics’, Business Ethics Quarterly 14(1), 47–69.
Kaptein, M. and J. Wempe: 2002, The Balanced Company (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Keijzers, G.: 2002, ‘The Transition to the Sustainable Enterprise’, Journal of Cleaner Production 10, 349–359.
Matten, D.A. Crane and W. Chapple: 2003, ‘Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship’, Journal of Business Ethics 45(1), 109–120.
Mitchell, R., R. Agle and D. Wood: 1997, ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853–886.
Morrison, J.: 2003, ‘Corporate Citizenship: More than a Metaphor?’ Journal of Corporate Citizenship 10, 89–102.
Münch, R.: 1991, Dialektik der Kommunikationsgesellschaft (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main).
Parsons, T.: 1971, The System of Modern Societies (Prentice Hall, Englewood Clis, NJ).
Parsons, T. and N. Smelser: 1956, Economy and Society (Routledge, London).
Porter, M.: 1980, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press, New York).
Rawls, J.: 1972, A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, London).
Ricoeur, P.: 1975, La mètaphore Vive (Seuil, Paris).
Rokeach, M.: 1973, The Nature of Human Values (Free Press, New York).
Roome, N.: 2001, ‘Conceptualising and Studying the Contribution of Networks in Environmental Management and Sustainable Development’, Business Strategy and the Environment 10, 69–76.
Russ, Th.: 2003, ‘Moral Underpinnings of the Precautionary Principle’, Estonian Business Review, 15, 95–103.
Van Luijk, H.: 1994, ‘Rights and Interests in a Participatory Market Society’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(1), 79–96.
Waddock, S. and N. Smith: 2000, ‘Relationships: The Real Challenge of Corporate Global Citizenship’, Business and Society Review 105(1), 47–62.
Wood, D. and J. Logsdon: 2002, ‘Business Citizenship: From Individuals to Organizations’, in R. E. Freeman and S. Venkataraman (eds.), Ethics and Entrepreneurship (The Ruffin Series No. 3, Society for Business Ethics, Charlottesville), pp. 59–94.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jeurissen, R. Institutional Conditions of Corporate Citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics 53, 87–96 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039401.06659.f8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039401.06659.f8