Abstract
It has long been taken for granted in modern psychology that access to the unconscious is indirectly gained through the interpretation of a trained psychoanalyst, evident in theories of Freud, Jung and others. However, my essay problematizes this very indirectness of access by bringing in a Yogācāra Buddhist formulation of the subliminal mind that offers a direct access. By probing into the philosophical significance of the subliminal mind along the bias of its access, I will argue that the different views of the subliminal consciousness correspond to different models of “transcendence” and “immanence.” We will see that the involvement of the transcendence principle in Freud’s and Jung’s conceptualizations of the unconscious results in the denial of direct access to the unconscious; only the Buddhist immanence-based formulation provides direct access. This East-West comparative approach is an attempt to examine how different models of reasoning, vis-à-vis transcendence and immanence, can lead to drastically different theories as well as the practices they instruct.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B.E. Brown, The Buddha Nature: A Study of the Tathāgatagarbha and Ālayavijñāna (Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1991).
Marie-Louise Von Franz, C.G. Jung: His Myth of Our Time, tr. William H. Kennedy (Toronto, Canada: Inner City Books, 1998).
Sigmund Freud, “The Ego and the Id,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, ed. and tr. James Strachey (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1960).
Sigmund Freud, “New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Ed. and tr. James Strachey (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1964).
Sigmund Freud, “The Interpretation of Dreams,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, ed. and tr. James Strachey (New York: Avon Books, Inc., 1965).
David Hall and Roger Ames, Thinking Through Confucius (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1987).
Jolande Jacobi, Complex, Archetype, Symbol in the Psychology of Jung, tr. Ralph Manheim (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959).
C.G. Jung, Two Essays on Analytical Psychology (The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Vol 7), 2nd edn, Bollingen Series XX, ed. Michael Fordham Sir Herbert Read, Gerhard Adler and tr. R.F.C. Hull (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966).
C.G. Jung, The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche (The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Vol. 8, Part I), 2nd edn, Bollingen Series XX, ed. Michael Fordham Sir Herbert Read, Gerhard Adler and tr. R.F.C. Hull (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969a).
C.G. Jung, The Archetype and The Collective Unconscious (The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Vol. 9, Part I), 2nd edn., Bollingen Series XX, ed. Michael Fordham Sir Herbert Read, Gerhard Adler and tr. R.F.C. Hull (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969b).
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, tr. Norman Kemp Smith (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1929).
Robert Cummings Neville, Boston Confucianism: Portable Tradition in the Late-Modern World (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2000).
Lambert Schmithausen, Ālayavijñāna: On the Origin and the Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy (Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies, 1987).
Gay Watson, The Resonance of Emptiness: A Buddhist Inspiration for a Contemporary Psychotherapy (Surrey, TW9 1BP: Curzon, 1998).
Xuan Zang, Ch’eng Wei-Shih Lun: The Doctrine of Mere-Consciousness, tr. Wei Tat (Hong Kong: The Ch’eng Wei-Shih Lun Publishing Committee, 1973).
Yasuo Yuasa. Yongu to Tōyō (Jung and the East) (Tokyo, Japan: Jinbun Shuen, 1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, T. Accessibility of the subliminal mind: Transcendence vs. immanence. Cont Philos Rev 38, 143–164 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-006-0695-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-006-0695-6