Skip to main content
Log in

Action research and knowledge co-generation: a not so dangerous liaison with conventional social research

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article reflects on experience of action research in the context of regional development, where there has been pressure to produce practical results. The epistemological status of Action Research is explored, in contrast to conventional social science research. The article concludes that an ongoing relationship with conventional social research is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno TW, Albert H, Dahrendorf R, Habermas J, Pilot H, Popper K (1976) The positivist dispute in german sociology. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Putnam R, Smith D (1985) Action science: concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer AJ (1990) The central questions of philosophy. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blurrell G, Morgan G (1982) Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Gower, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida J (2004) Writing and differences. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M et al (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood DJ (2002) Action research: unfulfilled promises and unmet challenges.Concept Transform 7(7):117–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood DJ, Levin M (1998) An introduction to action research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen B (2004) Making knowledge actionable: from theoretical centralism to distributive constructivism. Concept Transform 9(2): 147–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1974) Theory and practice. Heinemann Education Books Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1997) The theory of communicative action. Volume one: Reason and the realization of society. Volume two: Lifeworld and system: a critique of functuionalist reason. Polity Press, Cambridge

  • Habermas J (1998) Between facts and norms: contribution to a discourse theory of law and democracy. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen HCG (2001) Involvement at work—a study of communicative processes and individual involvement in organisational development. Samfundslitteratur, København

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen HCG (2005a) Aksjonsfaget: Fra det økonomiske demokratiet til den kommunikative vendingen - et idéhistorisk perspektiv. In: Johnsen Åge (ed) Organisasjonsteori pånorsk. Oslo (fourthcomming)

  • Johnsen HCG (2005b) Den kommunikative vending i arbeidslivsforskningen – noen refleksjoner og erfaringer! Chapter in the antology: How to identify workplace learning? – Reflections on theories and methods concerning specific projects. Learning lab (fothcomming), København

  • Johnsen HCG, Karlsen J (2005) Action research design in a complex environment: the problem of accountability. Paper presentert på 3. Nationale Konferance: Metoder i Aksjonsforskning 4. og 5. November 2004 Ålborg Universitet. To be published by Ålborg University 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen HCG, Norman R (2004) “When research and practice collide: the role of action research when there is a conflict of interest with stakeholders”. Systemic Practice and Action Research, Vol. 17, No. 3, June

  • Johnsen HCG, Tor Claussen (2002) Democracy, participation and communicative change: When democracy becomes a means and not an end. In: Levin M (ed) Researching Enterprise Development. Action research on the cooperation between management and labour in Norway. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina K (1999) Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin M (ed) (2002) Researching enterprise development. Action research on the cooperation between management and labor in Norway. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey B (2002) Postmodernism vs. truth in management theory. In: Ed Locke (ed) Modernism and Management: Pros, Cons, and Altrnatives. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  • Merton RK (1973) The sociology of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking science knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R (2001) Invariance: the structure of the objective world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pålshaugen Ø (2002) Discourse democracy at work: on public spheres in private enterprises. Concept Transform 7:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K (1979) Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. The Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) (2001) Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle G (1949) The Concept of Mind. The Chicago University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjervheim H (1959) Objectivism and the study of man. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin S (2001) Return to reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin S, Gustavsen B (eds) (1996) Beyond theory: changing organizations through participation. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte WF (ed) (1991) Participatory action research. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Chr Garmann Johnsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnsen, H.C.G. Action research and knowledge co-generation: a not so dangerous liaison with conventional social research. AI & Soc 19, 543–551 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0320-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0320-y

Keywords

Navigation