Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technology as empowerment: a capability approach to computer ethics

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Standard agent and action-based approaches in computer ethics tend to have difficulty dealing with complex systems-level issues such as the digital divide and globalisation. This paper argues for a value-based agenda to complement traditional approaches in computer ethics, and that one value-based approach well-suited to technological domains can be found in capability theory. Capability approaches have recently become influential in a number of fields with an ethical or policy dimension, but have not so far been applied in computer ethics. The paper introduces two major versions of the theory – those advanced by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum – and argues that they offer potentially valuable conceptual tools for computer ethics. By developing a theory of value based on core human functionings and the capabilities (powers, freedoms) required to realise them, capability theory is shown to have a number of potential benefits that complement standard ethical theory, opening up new approaches to analysis and providing a framework that incorporates a justice as well as an ethics dimension. The underlying functionalism of capability theory is seen to be particularly appropriate to technology ethics, enabling the integration of normative and descriptive analysis of technology in terms of human needs and values. The paper concludes by considering some criticisms of the theory and directions for further development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • S. Alkire. Capability and Functionings: Definition and justification, 2005, http://fas.harvard.edu/∼freedoms/documents/HDCA_Briefing_Concepts.pdf

  • S. Alkire (2002) Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Brey. Theorizing the Cultural Quality of New Media. Techné (forthcoming)

  • P. Brey. Disclosive Computer Ethics. In R.A. Spinello and H.T. Tavani, editors, Readings in CyberEthics. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, 2001.

  • T.W. Bynum. Flourishing Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology (forthcoming)

  • T.W. Bynum. Computer Ethics: Basic Concepts and Historical Overview. In E.N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2001 Edition), 2001.

  • T.W. Bynum. Computer Ethics in the Computer Science Curriculum. In T.W. Bynum, W. Maner and J.L. Fodor, editors, Teaching Computer Ethics. Research Center on Computing & Society, 1993.

  • Clark A., Chalmers D. (1998) The Extended Mind. Analysis 58:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen M.P., Shenton R.W. (1996) Doctrines of Development. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Dahlbom. People and Technology. In Studies in the Use of Information Technology, Report 13, Institutionen för Informatik, Göteborgs Universitet, 1996.

  • Dennett D.C. (1996) Kinds of Minds: Towards an Understanding of Consciousness. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis J.M. (1980) Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Friedman and H. Nissenbaum. Bias in Computer Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14(3): 330–347, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory R.L. (1981) Mind in Science: A History of Explanations in Psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • L.D. Introna and H. Nissenbaum. Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters. The Information Society, 16(3): 169–185, 2000.

  • Johnson D.G. (2001) Computer Ethics, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef M. (1993) Human Scale Development: Concept, Application and Further Reflections. Apex Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Moore. What is Computer Ethics? In T.W. Bynum, editor, Computers and Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford, 1985.

  • Narayan D., Chambers R., Shah M.K., Petesch P. (2000a) Voices of the Poor: Crying Out for Change. Oxford University Press for the World Bank, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan D., Patel R., Schafft K., Rademacher A. and Koch-Schutte S. (2000b) Voices of the Poor: Can Anyone Hear Us? Oxford University Press for the World Bank, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M.C. (1992) Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism. Political Theory 20: 202–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M.C. (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M.C. (1995a) Human Capabilities, Female Human Being. In: Nussbaum M.C., Glover J. (eds), Women, Culture and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M.C. (1995b) Aristotle on Human Nature and the Foundations of Ethics. In: Altham J.E.J., Harrison R. (eds), World, Mind and Ethics: Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 86–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M.C. (1993) Non-relative Value: An Aristotelian Approach. In: Nussbaum M.C., Sen A.K. (eds), The Quality of Life. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 242–269

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • D. Ruta, L. Camfield and C. Donaldson. Sen and the Art of Quality of Life Maintenance: Towards a Working Definition of Quality of Life. ESRC Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries, 2006.

  • A.K. Sen. Poor, Relatively Speaking. Oxford Economic Papers, 35: 153–169, 1983 (Reprinted in A.K. Sen. Resources, Values and Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.)

  • Sen A.K. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A.K. (1997) On Economic Inequality, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A.K. (1993) Capability and Well-Being. In: Nussbaum M.C. and Sen A.K. (eds), The Quality of Life. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A.K. (1992) Inequality Reexamined. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoven, J. (1995). Equal Access and Social Justice: Information as a Primary Good. ETHICOMP Conference, De Montfort University, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitbeck C. (1998) Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Wiener. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society, 2nd edn. Doubleday Anchor, New York, 1954.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justine Johnstone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnstone, J. Technology as empowerment: a capability approach to computer ethics. Ethics Inf Technol 9, 73–87 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9127-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9127-x

Keywords

Navigation