Skip to main content
Log in

The education of the categorical imperative

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, I examine anew the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant and its contributions to educational theory. I make four claims. First, that Kant should be read as having the Categorical Imperative develop out of subjective maxims. Second, that moral self-perfection is the aim of moral education. Third, that moral self-perfection develops by children habituating the results of their moral maxims in scenarios and cases. Fourth, that character and culture, Kant’s highest aims for humanity, are the ultimate beneficiaries of this process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck LW (1960) A commentary on Kant’s critique of practical reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell SR (2002) Constructivism and the limits of reason: revisiting the kantian problematic. Stud Philos Educ 21(6):421–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Donagan A (1977) A theory of morality. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor M (1963) Laws of freedom: a study of Kant’s method of applying the categorical imperative in the metaphysik der sitten. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman B (1993) The practice of moral judgment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill TE Jr (1992) Dignity and practical reason in Kant’s moral theory. Cornell University Press, Ithica

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen A, Toulmin S (1988) The abuse of casuistry: a history of moral reasoning. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1996a) Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. In: Gregor M (ed) The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: practical philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1996b) The metaphysics of morals. In: Gregor M (ed) The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: practical philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1996c) Religion within the boundaries of mere reason. In: Wood A, DiGiovanni G (eds) The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: religion and rational theology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1996d) Critique of practical reason. In: Gregor M (ed) The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: practical philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (2005) Education. In: Russo M (ed) Sophia project: Sophia study editions (http://www.molloy.edu/academic/philosophy/sophia/topics/phiedu/kan)

  • Kanz H (1993) Immanuel Kant. In: Prospects: the quarterly review of comparative education, Vol. XXIII, no. 3/4. UNESCO, Paris, p. 789–806

  • Korsgaard C (1996) Creating the Kingdom of ends. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J-H, Wringe C (1993) Rational autonomy, morality, and education. J Philos Educ 27(1):69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovlie L (1997) The uses of example in moral education. J Philos Educ 31(1):409–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Okshevsky WC (2001) Kant’s catechism for moral education: from particularity through universality to morality in Philosophy of Education 2000. University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, pp 94-102

  • Rawls J (2000) Lectures in the history of moral philosophy. Herman B (ed). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, esp. pp. 167–170.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnston, J.S. The education of the categorical imperative. Stud Philos Educ 25, 385–402 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-006-9006-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-006-9006-2

Keywords

Navigation