Skip to main content
Log in

The Importance of a Good Ending: Some Reflections on Samuel Scheffler’s Death and the Afterlife

  • Published:
The Journal of Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In his recent book, Death and the Afterlife, Samuel Scheffler argues that it matters greatly to us that there be other human beings long after our own deaths. In support of this “Afterlife Thesis,” as I call it, he provides a thought experiment—the “doomsday scenario”—in which we learn that, although we ourselves will live a normal life span, 30 days after our death the earth will be completely destroyed. In this paper I question this “doomsday scenario” support for Scheffler’s Afterlife Thesis. In particular, I suggest that Scheffler has underestimated the importance of a good ending.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. At least I read Scheffler as offering the doomsday scenario as support for the Afterlife Thesis. For another interpretation, see Sect. 4 below.

  2. Note that my categorization below does not fully correspond to the one in Scheffler (2013: 42). For present purposes, I have lumped together some of his categories, and added one (the third one below).

References

  • Fischer, J.M. 2013. Immortality. In Oxford handbook of philosophy of death, eds. B. Bradley, F. Feldman, and J. Johansson, 336–354. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Frankfurt, H. 2013. How the afterlife matters. In Scheffler 2013, 131–141.

  • Kolodny, N. 2013. That I should die and others live. In Scheffler 2013, 159–173.

  • Scheffler, S. 2013. Death and the afterlife, ed. N. Kolodny. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Shiffrin, S.V. 2013. Preserving the valued or preserving valuing? In Scheffler 2013, 143–158.

  • Williams, B. 1973. The Macropulos Case: Reflections on the tedium of immortality. In Problems of the self, 82–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted in The metaphysics of death, ed. J. M. Fischer, 73–92. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.).

  • Wolf, S. 2013. The significance of doomsday. In Scheffler 2013, 113–129.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Johansson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johansson, J. The Importance of a Good Ending: Some Reflections on Samuel Scheffler’s Death and the Afterlife . J Ethics 19, 185–195 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-015-9197-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-015-9197-2

Keywords

Navigation