Abstract
The issue of the relationship between formal and informal logic depends strongly on how one understands these two designations. While there is very little disagreement about the nature of formal logic, the same is not true regarding informal logic, which is understood in various (often incompatible) ways by various thinkers. After reviewing some of the more prominent conceptions of informal logic, I will present my own, defend it and then show how informal logic, so understood, is complementary to formal logic.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barth, E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, Walter de Gruyter, New York/Berlin.
Bentham, J. van et al. (eds.): 1996, Logic and Argumentation, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences/North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.
Blair, J. A. and R. H. Johnson (eds.): 1980, Informal Logic: The First International Symposium, Edge Press, Inverness.
Blair, J. A. and R. H. Johnson (eds.): 1994, New Essays in Informal Logic, Informal Logic, Windsor.
Carney, J. D. and R. K. Scheer: 1964, Fundamentals of Logic, Macmillan, New York (3rd ed., 1980).
Copi, I.: 1982, Introduction to Logic, Macmillan, New York (6th ed.).
Copi, I.: 1986, Informal Logic, Macmillan, New York.
Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst and F. Snoek Henkemans: 1996, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ.
Finocchiaro, M.: 1984, ‘Informal Logic and the Theory of Reasoning', Informal Logic 6, 3–8.
Finocchiaro, M.: 1996, ‘Informal Factors in the Formal Evaluation of Arguments'. In: J. van Bentham (1996).
Freeman, James: 1994, ‘The Place of Informal Logic in Logic'. In: Blair and Johnson (1994), 36–49.
Goldman, A.: 1986, Epistemology and Cognition, Harvard, Cambridge, MA.
Govier, T.: 1987, Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, Foris, Dordrecht.
Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London.
Hansen, H. V. and R. C. Pinto (eds.): 1995, Fallacies. Classical and Contemporary Reading, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.
Hintikka, J.: 1989, ‘The Role of Logic in Argumentation', The Monist 72, 1–24.
Johnson, R. H.: 1992, ‘The Problem of Defining Critical Thinking', in S. P. Norris (ed.), The Generalizability of Critical Thinking, Teachers College Press, New York, 38–53.
Johnson, R. H.: 1996, The Rise of Informal Logic, Vale Press, Newport News, VA.
Johnson, R. H. and J. A. Blair: 1987, ‘The Current State of Informal Logic', Informal Logic 9, 147–151.
Johnson, R. H. and J. A. Blair: 1996, ‘Informal Logic and Critical Thinking'. In: F. Snoek Henkemans: Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ van Eemeren and Grootendorst (1996).
Johnson, R. H. and J. A. Blair: 1997, ‘Informal Logic in the 20th Century', in D. Walton and A. Brinton (eds.), Historical Foundations of Informal Logic, Ashgate, Aldershot, 158–173.
Kahane, H.: 1971, Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reasoning in Everyday Life, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA (6th ed., 1992).
Massey, G.: 1981, ‘The Fallacy behind Fallacies', Midwest Journal of Philosophy 6, 489–500.
McPeck, J.: 1981, Critical Thinking and Education, Martin Robertson, Oxford.
Perelman, Ch. & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1958, La Nouvelle Rhetorique, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Ryle, G.: 1954, Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Scriven, M.: 1980, ‘The Philosophical Significance of Informal Logic'. In: Blair and Johnson (1980), 148–160.
Scriven, M.: 1993, Defining Critical Thinking, (Unpublished manuscript).
Siegel, H.: 1988, Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking and Education, Routledge, New York and London.
Toulmin, S.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Walton, D.: 1990, ‘What is Reasoning? What is an Argument?', The Journal of Philosophy 87, 399–419.
Walton, D. and A. B. Brinton (eds.): 1997, Historical Foundations of Informal Logic, Ashgate, Aldershot.
Walton, D. and A. Brinton: 1997, ‘Introduction'. In: Walton and Brinton, 1–11.
Weinstein, M.: 1994, ‘Informal Logic and Applied Epistemology'. In: Blair and Johnson (1999), 140–161.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1951, Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Macmillan, New York.
Woods, J.: 1980, ‘What is Informal Logic?’ In: Blair and Johnson (1980), 57–68.
Woods, J.: 1995, ‘Fearful Symmetry’. In: Hansen and Pinto (1995), 181–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, R.H. The Relation between Formal and Informal Logic. Argumentation 13, 265–274 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007789101256
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007789101256