Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do customs compete with conditioning? Turf battles and division of labor in social explanation

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We often face a bewildering array of different explanations for the same social facts (e.g. biological, psychological, economic, and historical accounts). But we have few guidelines for whether and when we should think of different accounts as competing or compatible. In this paper, I offer some guidelines for understanding when custom or norm accounts do and don’t compete with other types of accounts. I describe two families of non-competing accounts: (1) explanations of different (but similarly described) facts, and (2) accounts which seem to differ but are really different parts or versions of the same underlying explanation. I argue that, while many types of apparent competitors don’t really compete with customs, there are some that do. I also describe some of the central problems, which suggest that custom accounts will compete poorly with their rivals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong D. (1980) A theory of universals universals and scientific realism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, P. (2009). An argument against disjunctive properties. http://www.paulaudi.net/Audi_Disjunctive_Properties.pdf.

  • Bechtel W., Mundale J. (1999) Multiple realizability revisited. Linking cognitive and neural states. Philosophy of Science 66: 175–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett J. (1988) Events and their names. Hackett, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontly T. D. (2005) Exclusion, overdetermination, and the nature of causation. Journal of Philosophical Research 30: 261–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C., Rosaria, C., & Paolucci, M. (1998). Normative reputation and the costs of compliance. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1(3), http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/3/3.html.

  • Churchland P. (2005) Functionalism at forty: A critical retrospective. Journal of Philosophy 102(1): 33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser L. (1956) The Functions of Social Conflict. Free Press, Glencoe, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Craver C. (2007) Explaining the brain. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Derkse W. (1992) On simplicity and elegance. Eburon, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E. (1982) Rules of the sociological method. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud S. (1990) Beyond the pleasure principle. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs J. (1968) The Study of Norms. In: Sills D. (eds) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (vol 11). Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall E. (1976) Beyond culture. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall N. (2008) Causation. In: Jackson F., Smith M. (eds) The oxford handbook of contemporary philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 505–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Harford T. (2008) The logic of life: The rational economics of an irrational world. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson D. (2005) Norms, invariance, and explanatory relevance. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35: 324–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G. (2001) Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui C. H., Triandis H. C. (1986) Individualism–collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 17(2): 225–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. (2003) The failure of the best arguments against social reduction (And what that failure doesn’t mean). Southern Journal of Philosophy 41(4): 547–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. (2004a) Reduction and anti-reduction: Rights and wrongs. Metaphilosophy 25(5): 614–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. (2004b) Special Sciences: Still a flawed argument after all these years. Cognitive Science 28(3): 409–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. (2006) We always have a beer after the meeting. How norms, customs, conventions, and the like explain behavior. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36(3): 251–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. (2007) What’s done here—Explaining behavior in terms of customs and norms. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45: 363–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. (2008) Unification. In: Psillos S., Curd M. (eds) The Routledge companion to the philosophy of science. Routledge, New York, pp 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. (2009) Norms and Customs: Causally important or causally impotent?. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39(4): 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. (1969) Events and their descriptions: Some considerations. In: Rescher N. (eds) Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 198–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. (2000) Mind in a physical world. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. (2005) Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1986). Events. In Philosophical papers (Vol. II, pp. 241–269). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Leiter, B. (2007). Explaining theoretical disagreement. University of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 124. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1004768.

  • List, C., & Menzies, P. (2009). Non-reductive physicalism and the limits of the exclusion principle. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/20118/.

  • Loewer B. (2009) Why is there anything except physics?. Synthese 170(2): 217–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie J. (1993) Causes and conditions. In: Sosa E., Tooley M. (eds) Causation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 33–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K. (1906) Capital: A critique of political economy. Charles H. Kerr, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • McClamrock R. (1995) Screening-off and the levels of selection. Erkenntnis: An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy 42(1): 107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath M. (1998) Proportionality and mental causation: A fit?. Philosophical Perspectives 12: 167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire M., Troisi A. (1998) Darwinian psychiatry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk M. (1995) Two cheers for reductionism: Or, the dim prospects for non-reductive materialism. Philosophy of Science 62: 370–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T. (1964) The social system. Routledge & Paul, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons P., Shils E. (1951) Toward a general theory of action. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins H. W., Haines P., Rice R. (2005) Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: A nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms, and student alcohol misuse. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 66: 470–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Polger T. (2008) How to test for multiple realization. Philosophy of Science 75: 537–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice D., Miller D. (1996) Pluralistic ignorance and the perpetuation of social norms by unwitting actors. In: Zanna M. (eds) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Raatikainen, P. (2009). Causation, exclusion, and the special sciences. Erkenntnis (forthcoming).

  • Saam, N., & Harrer, A. (1999). Simulating norms, social inequality, and functional change in artificial societies. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2(1). http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/2/1/2.html.

  • Sherif M. (1967) Formation of social norms: The experimental paradigm. In: Sherif M. (eds) Social interaction. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner B. (1953) Science and human behavior. Free Press, Glencoe, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E. (1999) The multiple realizability argument against reductionism. Philosophy of Science 66: 542–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J. (2003) Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Yablo S. (1992) Mental causation. Philosophical Review 101: 245–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA

    Todd Jones

Authors
  1. Todd Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, T. Do customs compete with conditioning? Turf battles and division of labor in social explanation. Synthese 184, 407–430 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9794-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9794-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation