Skip to main content
Log in

The ‘redefinition of death’ debate: Western concepts and western bioethics

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biomedicine is a global enterprise constructed upon the belief in the universality of scientific truths. However, despite huge scientific advances over recent decades it has not been able to formulate a specific and universal definition of death: In fact, in its attempt to redefine death, the concept of death appears to have become immersed in ever increasing vagueness and ambiguity. Even more worrisome is that bioethics, in the form of principlism, is also endeavouring to become a global enterprise by claiming neutrality. It appears that the discourse within both disciplines have similarly manipulated the boundaries of death to include the “dying”. This paper argues that the redefinition of death debate in biomedicine reveals a concept of personhood which is profoundly western in origin and which is in accordance to the concept adhered to within principlism. Biomedicine and bioethics do not appear to acknowledge the limitations of their own world view and hence lack an understanding of their applicability and appropriateness in diverse social and cultural contexts; a situation which adds credence to claims as to the hegemonic and imperialistic nature of all such global enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Closer, K. & Gert, B. (1990) A critique of principlism, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15: 219–236.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lustig, B. (1992) The method of ‘Principlism’’: a critique of the critique, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17: 487–510.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, R. (1995) The principlism debate: a critical overview, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20: 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nicholson, R.H. (1994) Limitations of the four principles, in: Gillon, R., ed. Principles of healthcare ethics, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester: 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tangwa, B. (1999) Globalisation or westernisation? Ethical concerns in the whole bio-business, Bioethics 13: 218–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Have, H. ten (1998) Theoretical models and approaches to ethics. Seminar. The foundations and history of bioethics. The Netherlands.

  7. Gillon, R. (1994) Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope, British Medical Journal 309: 184–188.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell, A.V. (1999) Presidential Address: global bioethics — dream or nightmare?, Bioethics 13:183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Price, D.P. (1997) Organ transplant initiatives: the twilight zone, Journal of Medical Ethics 23: 170–175.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rutecki, G.W. (1994) Blurring distinctions between the dying and the dead: A call for discernment in organ donation, Ethics & Medicine 10: 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barlett, E.T. (1995) Differences between death and dying, Journal of Medical Ethics 2: 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Emergency Cardiac Care Committee and subcommittees, American Heart Association (1992) Guidelines of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardia care, JAMA 8: 2282–2288.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lock, M. (1996) Death in technological time: Locating the end of meaningful life, Medical Anthropology Quarterly 10: 575–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bernat, J., Culver, C.M. & Gert, B. (1981) On the definition and criterion of death, Annals of Internal Medicine 94: 389–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Annas, G. (1988) Brain death and organ donation: you can have one without the other, Hastings Center Report 18: 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Angstwurn, H. (1991) Brain death as death of a human being: a matter of image of man, in: Land, W., Dossetor, J.B., eds., Organ Replacement Therapy: Justice and Commerce. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  20. La Fontaine, J.S. (1985) Person and individual: some anthropological reflections, in Carrithers, M., Collins, S. & Lukes, S., eds. The category of the person, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carrithers, M., Collins, S. & Lukes, S. (1985) The category of the person, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Beauchamp, T. & Childress, J. (1994) Principles of biomedical ethics, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dinz, D., Guilhem, D.B. & Garrafa, V. (1999) Bioethics in Brazil, Bioethics 13: No.4: 244–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cook, R. (1994) Feminism and the four principles, in: Gillion, R eds., Principles of healthcare ethics. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester: 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tong, R. (1998) The ethics of care: a feminist virtue ethics of care for healthcare practitioners, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23/2: 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid

    Google Scholar 

  31. Harris, J. (1985) The value of life, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Parfit, D. (1985) Reasons and persons, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Idid

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lamb, D. (1985) Death, brain death and ethics, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lamb, D. (1988) Down the slippery slope, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lamb, D. (1990) Organ transplants and ethics, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Engelhardt, T. (1975) Defining death: A philosophical problem for medicine and law, American Review Centre Report 52: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibid

    Google Scholar 

  40. Morris, B. (1991) Western conceptions of the individual, St. Martin’s Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Morris, B. (1996) Ecology & anarchism, Images Publishing, Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hoffmaster, B. (1994) The forms and limits of medical ethics, Social Science & Medicine 39: 1155–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sass, H.M. (1991) Philosophical arguments in accepting brain death criteria, in: Land, W. & Dossetor, J.B., eds., Organ replacement therapy: Ethics, justice and commerce. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lock, M. (1996) Death in technological time: locating the end of meaningful life, Medical Anthropology Quarterly 10: 578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Oknuki-Tierney, E. (1994) Brain death and organ transplantation, Current Anthropology 35: 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Feldman, E.A. (1988) Defining death: Organ transplants, tradition and technology in Japan, Social Science & Medicine 27: 339–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sakamoto, H. (1999) Towards a new ‘Global Bioethics’, Bioethics 13: 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ibid

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ibid

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lock, M. & Honde, C. (1990) Reaching consensus about death: heart transplants and cultural identity in Japan, in: Weis, G., ed. Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston: 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Becker, C. (1999) Money talks, money kills — the economics of transplantation in Japan and China, Bioethics 13: 236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ibid

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Nudeshima, J. (1991) Obstacles to brain death and organ transplantation in Japan, The Lancet 228: 1063–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ibid

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ibid

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lock, M. & Honde, C. (1990) Reaching consensus about death: heart transplants and cultural identity in Japan, in: Weis, G., ed. Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston: 109.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid (6).

  59. Ibid

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Beaufort, L.D. & Dupuis, H.M. (1983) Handbook Gezondleidsnthie, Van Gorcum, Assen/Masstricht.

  61. Ibid

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Cooter, R. (1995) The resistible rise of medical ethics, Social History of Medicine 8: 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Foucault, M. (1980) Power/knowledge, Harvester, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Birch, A. (1993) Concepts and theories of modern democracy, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wrong, D. (1995) Power: its forms, base and uses, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Weber, M. (1964) The theory of social and economic organisation, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bourdieu, P. (1991) Languages and symbolic power, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ibid

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Ms. Jones is an intensive care clinical nursing specialist.

Dr. Kessel is a public health physician and medical ethicist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, S.F., Kessel, A.S. The ‘redefinition of death’ debate: Western concepts and western bioethics. SCI ENG ETHICS 7, 63–75 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0024-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0024-8

Keywords

Navigation