Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis based on Website Disclosures

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, more corporations disclose information about their environmental performance in response to stakeholder demands of environmental responsibility and accountability. What information do corporations disclose on their websites? This paper investigates the environmental management policies and practices of the 200 largest corporations in the world. Based on a content analysis of the environmental reports of Fortune’s Global 200 companies, this research analyzes the content of corporate environmental disclosures with respect to the following seven areas: environmental planning considerations, top management support to the institutionalization of environmental concerns, environmental structures and organizing specifics, environmental leadership activities, environmental control, external validations or certifications of environmental programs, and forms of corporate environmental disclosures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous: 2001, ‘India’s Greenest Companies: A BT-TERI Project’, Business Today May 6

  • Buchholz R. (1998) Principles of Environmental Management: The Greening of Business. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey J. (2004) Global Warming. Business Week Magazine 16:60–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft R. (1995) Understanding Management. The Dryden Press, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechant K., Altman B. (1994) Environmental Leadership: From Compliance to Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Executive 8(3):7–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C., Gordon B. (1996) A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Policies of Australian Corporations. Accounting and Business Research 26(3):187–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Enarsson L. (1998) Evaluation of Suppliers: How to Consider the Environment. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics 28(1):5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Electric: (2002), ‘Environment, Health, and Safety: Vision and Policy’, http://www.ge.com/en/commitment/ehs/ehs_home_feature.htm

  • Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S. (1995) Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8(2):47–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenewegen P., Vergragt P. (1991) Environmental Issues as Threats and Opportunities for Technological Innovation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 3(1):43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie J. E., Parker L. D. (1989) Corporate Social Reporting: A Rebuttal of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting and Business Research 9:343–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie J. E., Parker L. D. (1990) Corporate Social Disclosure Practice: A Comparative International Analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 3:159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall R. (1999) Organizations: Structures, Processes, & Outcomes, 7th Edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart S. (1995) A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Review 20(4):986–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti O. R. (1969) Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones K., Alabaster T., Walton J. (1998) Virtual Environments for Environmental Reporting. Greener Management International 21:121–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, D. and M. Chang: 1999, ‘Search and Disclosure: Corporate Environmental Reports’, Environment 41(2):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk A. (1999) Evaluating Corporate Environmental Reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment 8:225–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk A. (2003) Trends in Sustainability Reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment 12:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (1999) KPMG International Survey of Environmental Reporting 1999. KPMG Environmental Consulting, DeMeern, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2002) KPMG International Survey of Environmental Reporting 2002. KPMG Environmental Consulting, DeMeern, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L. (2001) Encouraging Environmental Accounting World Wide: A Survey of Government Policies and Instruments. Corporate Environmental Strategy 8(1):55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean R., Gottfrid R. (2000) Corporate Environmental Reports: Stuck Management Processes Hold Back Real Progress. Corporate Environmental Strategy 7(2):244–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I., Ralston D. (2002) Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses’ Self Presentations. Journal of International Business Studies 33(3):497–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marken G. A. (1998) The Internet and the Web: The Two-Way Public Relations Highway. Online Public Relations 43(1):31–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews M. R. (1993) Socially Responsible Accounting. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazurek Jan.: 2004, Third Party Auditing of Environmental Management Systems, presented at the ASPA Research Conference, in Portland, Oregon

  • Meek G., Roberts C. (1995) Factors Influencing Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures by U.S., U.K., and Continental European Multinational Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 20(3):555–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metrick, C.: 2001, ‘Env_Reporting_Forum IRCC Reports on Corporate Environmental Performance in␣Japan’, http://www.listserv.moses.com/pipermail/env_reporting_forum/2001/000013.html

  • Morhardt J., Baird S., Freeman K. (2002) Scoring Corporate Environmental and Sustainability Reports Using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and Other Criteria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9:215–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu D. H., Warsame H., Pedwell K. (1998) Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society (Oxford), 23(3):265–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen T, Niskanen J. (2001) The Objectivity of Corporate Environmental Reporting: A Study of Finnish Listed Firms’ Environmental Disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment 10(1):29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskala M., Pretes M. (1995) Environmental Reporting in Finland: A Note on the Use of Annual Reports. Accounting, Organizations, and Society (Oxford) 20(6):457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck P., Sinding K. (2003) Environmental and Social Disclosure and Data Richness in the Mining Industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 12:131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post J. E., Altman B. W. (1992) Models of Corporate Greening: How Corporate Social Policy and Organizational Learning Inform Leading Edge Environmental Management. Markets, Politics, and Social Performance: Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 13:3–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts C. B. (1992) Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory. Accounting, Organizations, and Society (Oxford) 17(6):595–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen C. M. (2001) Environmental Strategy and Competitive Advantage. California Management Review 43(3):8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo M. V., Fouts P. A. (1997) A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40(3):534–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S., Burritt R. (2000) Contemporary Environmental Accounting. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P. (1995a) Environmental Technologies and Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal 16:183–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P. (1995b) Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society. Academy of Management Review 20(1):118–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skillius, A. and U. Wennberg: 1998, `Continuity, Credibility, and Comparability: Key Challenges for Corporate Environmental Performance Measurement and Communication’, Report commissioned by the European Environment Agency

  • Snider J., Hill R. P., Martin D. (2003) Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World’s Most Successful Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 48(2):175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starik M., Rands G. P. (1995) Weaving an Integrated Web: Multilevel and Multisystem Perspectives of Ecologically Sustainable Organizations. Academy of Management Review 20:908–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White A. (1999) Sustainability and the Accountable Corporation. Environment 41(8):30–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright M. (1995) Goodbye Green Glossy. Tomorrow 5(4):48–54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita Jose.

Additional information

Anita Jose is an associate professor of Management and director of the MBA program at Hood College, Maryland. Her current research interests include business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and international management. Her articles have appeared in such publications as the Journal of Business Ethics, Southern Law Journal, Business Intelligence, and Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations. She received her MBA and MMGT from the University of Dallas and her Ph.D. from the University of North Texas.

Shang-Mei Lee, Ph.D., CFA, is currently an assistant professor of finance at St. Edward's University, Texas. Dr. Lee received her Ph.D. in finance from the George Washington University and was awarded with the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation by the Association of Investment Management and Research. Her research interests include international investments, business ethics, socially responsible investing, and personal financial planning. Her publications have appeared in The Southern Business and Economic Journal, as well as Proceedings of several Conferences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jose, A., Lee, SM. Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis based on Website Disclosures. J Bus Ethics 72, 307–321 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9172-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9172-8

Keywords

Navigation