Skip to main content
Log in

Patient decision making competence: Outlines of a conceptual analysis

  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to protect patients against medical paternalism, patients have been granted the right to respect of their autonomy. This right is operationalized first and foremost through the phenomenon of informed consent. If the patient withholds consent, medical treatment, including life-saving treatment, may not be provided. However, there is one proviso: The patient must be competent to realize his autonomy and reach a decision about his own care that reflects that autonomy. Since one of the most important patient rights hinges on the patient's competence, it is crucially important that patient decision making incompetence is clearly defined and can be diagnosed with the greatest possible degree of sensitivity and, even more important, specificity. Unfortunately, the reality is quite different. There is little consensus in the scientific literature and even less among clinicians and in the law as to what competence exactly means, let alone how it can be diagnosed reliably. And yet, patients are deemed incompetent on a daily basis, losing the right to respect of their autonomy. In this article, we set out to fill that hiatus by beginning at the very beginning, the literal meaning of the term competence. We suggest a generic definition of competence and derive four necessary conditions of competence. We then transpose this definition to the health care context and discuss patient decision making competence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appelbaum, P.S. and T. Grisso: 1988, ‘Assessing Patients' Capacities to Consent to Treatment’, N. Engl. J. Med. 319 (25), 1635–1638.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P.S. and L.H. Roth: 1981, ‘Clinical Issues in the Assessment of Competency’, Am. J. Psychiatry 138 (11), 1462–1467.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P.S. and L.H. Roth: 1982, ‘Competency to Consent to Research: A Psychiatric Overview’, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 39 (8), 951–958.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L.: 1991, ‘Competence’, in: M.A.G. Cutter and E.E. Shelp (eds.), Competency: A Study of Informal Competency Determinations in Primary Care (Kluwer Academic, Boston), pp. 49–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. and D. Brock: 1990, Deciding for Others. The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, D. and M. Silberfeld: 1995, ‘Reflections on Segregating and Assessing Areas of Competence’, Theoretical Medicine 16, 375–388.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Culver, C.M. and B. Gert: 1990, ‘The Inadequacy of Incompetence’, Milbank Q. 68 (4), 619–643.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faden, R.R. and T.L. Beauchamp: 1986, A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gert, B. at al.: 1997, Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klippe, H.v.d.: 1990, ‘Wilsonbekwaamheid in de psychiatrie: zes benaderingen’, Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid 45, 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legemaate, J.: 1992, ‘Criteria voor wilsonbekwaamheid’, NJB 76 (6), 190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, P.J.v.d. at al.: 1991, Medische beslissingen rond het levenseinde. Amsterdam: Sdu Uitgeverij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marta, J.: 1998, ‘Whose Consent Is It Anyway? A Poststructuralist Framing of the Person in Medical Decision–Making’, Theor. Med. Bioeth. 19 (4), 353–370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • May, T.: 1998, ‘Assessing CompetencyWithout Judging Merit’, J. Clin. Ethics 9 (3), 247–257.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E.D. and D.C. Thomasma: 1988, For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper–Smith, R. et al.: 1996, ‘Competency and Practical MJudgment’, Theor. Med. 17, 135–150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A.S. and A. de–Nesnera: 1991, ‘Informed Consent, Competency, and the Illusion of Rationality’, Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 13, 138–142.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L.H. et al.: 1977, ‘Tests of Competency to Consent to Treatment’, Am. J. Psychiatry 134 (3), 279–284.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welie, J.V.M.: 1998, In the Face of Suffering. The Philosophical–Anthropological Foundations of Clinical Ethics. Omaha: Creighton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welie, J.V.M.: 1999, ‘Do You Have a Healthy Smile? Ugliness as a Medical Indication for Dental and Surgical Treatment’, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2 (2), 169–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welie, S.P.K.: 2001, ‘Criteria for Patient Decision Making (In)competence: A Review of and Commentary on Some Empirical Approaches’, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy4 (2), 139–151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Welie, J.V.M., Welie, S.P.K. Patient decision making competence: Outlines of a conceptual analysis. Med Health Care Philos 4, 127–138 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011441816143

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011441816143

Navigation