Abstract
In order to protect patients against medical paternalism, patients have been granted the right to respect of their autonomy. This right is operationalized first and foremost through the phenomenon of informed consent. If the patient withholds consent, medical treatment, including life-saving treatment, may not be provided. However, there is one proviso: The patient must be competent to realize his autonomy and reach a decision about his own care that reflects that autonomy. Since one of the most important patient rights hinges on the patient's competence, it is crucially important that patient decision making incompetence is clearly defined and can be diagnosed with the greatest possible degree of sensitivity and, even more important, specificity. Unfortunately, the reality is quite different. There is little consensus in the scientific literature and even less among clinicians and in the law as to what competence exactly means, let alone how it can be diagnosed reliably. And yet, patients are deemed incompetent on a daily basis, losing the right to respect of their autonomy. In this article, we set out to fill that hiatus by beginning at the very beginning, the literal meaning of the term competence. We suggest a generic definition of competence and derive four necessary conditions of competence. We then transpose this definition to the health care context and discuss patient decision making competence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appelbaum, P.S. and T. Grisso: 1988, ‘Assessing Patients' Capacities to Consent to Treatment’, N. Engl. J. Med. 319 (25), 1635–1638.
Appelbaum, P.S. and L.H. Roth: 1981, ‘Clinical Issues in the Assessment of Competency’, Am. J. Psychiatry 138 (11), 1462–1467.
Appelbaum, P.S. and L.H. Roth: 1982, ‘Competency to Consent to Research: A Psychiatric Overview’, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 39 (8), 951–958.
Beauchamp, T.L.: 1991, ‘Competence’, in: M.A.G. Cutter and E.E. Shelp (eds.), Competency: A Study of Informal Competency Determinations in Primary Care (Kluwer Academic, Boston), pp. 49–77.
Buchanan, A. and D. Brock: 1990, Deciding for Others. The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Checkland, D. and M. Silberfeld: 1995, ‘Reflections on Segregating and Assessing Areas of Competence’, Theoretical Medicine 16, 375–388.
Culver, C.M. and B. Gert: 1990, ‘The Inadequacy of Incompetence’, Milbank Q. 68 (4), 619–643.
Faden, R.R. and T.L. Beauchamp: 1986, A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gert, B. at al.: 1997, Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klippe, H.v.d.: 1990, ‘Wilsonbekwaamheid in de psychiatrie: zes benaderingen’, Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid 45, 123–138.
Legemaate, J.: 1992, ‘Criteria voor wilsonbekwaamheid’, NJB 76 (6), 190–193.
Maas, P.J.v.d. at al.: 1991, Medische beslissingen rond het levenseinde. Amsterdam: Sdu Uitgeverij.
Marta, J.: 1998, ‘Whose Consent Is It Anyway? A Poststructuralist Framing of the Person in Medical Decision–Making’, Theor. Med. Bioeth. 19 (4), 353–370.
May, T.: 1998, ‘Assessing CompetencyWithout Judging Merit’, J. Clin. Ethics 9 (3), 247–257.
Pellegrino, E.D. and D.C. Thomasma: 1988, For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pepper–Smith, R. et al.: 1996, ‘Competency and Practical MJudgment’, Theor. Med. 17, 135–150.
Pomerantz, A.S. and A. de–Nesnera: 1991, ‘Informed Consent, Competency, and the Illusion of Rationality’, Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 13, 138–142.
Roth, L.H. et al.: 1977, ‘Tests of Competency to Consent to Treatment’, Am. J. Psychiatry 134 (3), 279–284.
Welie, J.V.M.: 1998, In the Face of Suffering. The Philosophical–Anthropological Foundations of Clinical Ethics. Omaha: Creighton University Press.
Welie, J.V.M.: 1999, ‘Do You Have a Healthy Smile? Ugliness as a Medical Indication for Dental and Surgical Treatment’, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2 (2), 169–180.
Welie, S.P.K.: 2001, ‘Criteria for Patient Decision Making (In)competence: A Review of and Commentary on Some Empirical Approaches’, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy4 (2), 139–151.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Welie, J.V.M., Welie, S.P.K. Patient decision making competence: Outlines of a conceptual analysis. Med Health Care Philos 4, 127–138 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011441816143
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011441816143