Skip to main content
Log in

Advance directives in patients with Alzheimer's disease; Ethical and clinical considerations

  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advance patient directives are various forms of anticipatory medical directives made by competent individuals for the eventuality of future incompetence. They are therefore appropriate instruments for competent patients in the early stage of Alzheimer's disease to document their self-determined will in the advanced stages of dementia. Theoretical objections have been expressed against the concept of advance patient directives (problems of authenticity and identity) which, however, cannot negate the fundamental moral authority of advance patient directives. Therefore, patients, family members, and physicians should make use of the appropriate form of advance directive as part of common treatment and care planning. Advance directives, when utilized intelligently, represent appropriate instruments for shared decision-making by patient, family members and physician. They should be utilized to a greater extent, particularly for the treatment planning of demented patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appelbaum, P.S. and T. Grisso: 1988, 'Assessing Patients' Capacities to Consent to Treatment', New. Engl. J. Med. 319, 1635–1638.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner Ärztekammer: 1999, 'Berufsordnung der Ärztekammer Berlin', Berliner Ärzte 6/99, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, D.W.: 1993, 'A proposal for the Use of Advance Directives in the Treatment of Incompetent Mentally Ill Persons', Bioethics 7, 247–256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A.E. and D.W. Brock: 1989, Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesärztekammer: 1998, 'Grundsätze der Bundesärztekammer zur ärztlichen Sterbebegleitung', Dt. Ärztebl. 95, C1690–1691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium der Justiz: 1994, Das neue Betreuungsgesetz.Bonn: Bundesministerium der Justiz, 5. edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresser, R.: 1995, 'Dworkin on Dementia. Elegant Theory, Questionable Policy', Hastings Cent. Rep. 25 (6), 32–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drickamer, M.A. and M.S. Lachs: 1992, 'Should Patients with Alzheimer's Disease be Told Their Diagnosis?', New Engl. J.Med. 326 (14), 947–951.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R.: 1986, 'Autonomy and the Demented Self', Milbank Quart. 64 (Suppl. 2), 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann, M. and J. Richter: 1999, 'Relationships Between Various Attitudes Towards Self–Determination in Health Care with Special Reference to an Advance Directive', J. Med.Ethics 25, 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, L.: 1994, 'Appropiate and Inappropiate Use of Advance Directives', J. Clin. Ethics 5, 357–360.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erde, E.L., E.C. Nadal and T.O. Scholl: 1988, 'On Truth Telling and the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease', J. Fam. Prac. 26, 401–406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faden, R.R. and T.L. Beauchamp: 1986,A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucane, T.E., B.A. Beamer, R.P. Roca and C.H. Kawas: 1993, 'Establishing Advance Directives with Demented Patients: A Pilot Study', J. Clin. Ethics 4 (1), 51–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T.: 1995, 'Auf der Suche nach der Verlorenen Zeit – Die Erinnerung in der Demenz', Fortschr. Neurol. Psychiat. 63, 38–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • High, D.M.: 1987, 'Planing for Decisional Incapacity. A Neglected Area in Ethics and Aging', J. Am. Geriat. Soc. 35, 814–820.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, S.C., M.P. Pfeifer and R. McNutt for the End of Life Study Group: 1995, 'The Discussion About Advance Directives. Patient and Physician Opinions Regarding When and How it Should be Conducted', Arch. Intern. Med. 155, 1025–1030.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kitword, T.: 1993, 'Person and Process in Dementia', Int. J.Geriat. Psychiat. 8, 541–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, H.G.: 1996, 'Die Wertigkeit der Prospektiven Dokumentation', in: F. Anschütz and H.L. Wedler HL (eds.), Suizidprävention und Sterbehilfe. Berlin: Ullstein Mosby, pp. 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, H.G., S. Reiter–Theil and H. Helmchen (eds.): 1996, Informed Consent in Psychiatry. European Perspectives of Ethics, Law and Clinical Practice. Baden–Baden: Nomos.

  • Kuczewski, M.G.: 1994, 'WhoseWill Is It, Anyway? A Discussion of Advance Directives, Personal Identity, and Consensus in Medical Ethics', Bioethics 8, 27–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meran, J.G.: 1997, 'Patientenverfügungen aus ärztlicher Sicht', Wiener Med. Wschr. 147, 117–120.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S.H., R. Koepp and E.P. Weber: 1996, 'Advance End–of–Life Treatment Planning. A Research Review', Arch. Intern. Med. 156, 1062–1068.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olick, R.S.: 1991, 'Approximating Informed Consent and Fostering Communication: The Anatomy of an Advance Directive', J. Clin. Ethics 2, 181–189.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D.: 1984, Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reifler, B.V., E. Larson and R. Hanley: 1982, 'Coexistence of Cognitive Impairment and Depression in Geriatric Outpatients', Am. J. Psychiat. 139, 623–626.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, H.J.: 1995, 'Das “Sterbehilfe”–Urteil des Bundesgerichtshofs vom 13.9.1994', Dtsch. Med. Wschr. 120, 341–344.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., C. Rajkumar and C. Bulpitt: 2000, 'Views of Elderly People on LivingWills: Interview Study', BritishMed. J. 320, 1640–1641.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schöne–Seifert, B.: 1996, 'Medizinethik', in: J. Nida–Rümelin (ed.), Angewandte Ethik. Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung. Ein Handbuch. Stuttgart: Kröner, pp. 553–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, T. and R. Dukoff: 1997, 'Informed Consent with Cognitively Impaired Patients: An NIMH Perspective on the Durable Power of Attorney', in: A.E. Shamoo (ed.), Ethics in Neurobiological Research with Human Subjects. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breacher, pp. 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmann, J. and I. Knöchel–Schiffer: 1999, 'Patientenverfügungen in der klinischen Praxis', Med. Klin. 94, pp. 398–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmann, J.: 2000, Aufklärung und Einwilligung in der Psychiatrie.Ein Beitrag zur Ethik in der Medizin. Monographienreihe aus dem Gesamtgebiete der Psychiatrie. Darmstadt: Steinkopff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J.W., J. Sobal, J.H. Tenney, J.M. Hoopes, D. Damron, S. Levenson, B.R. deForge and H.L. Muncie: 1986, 'Informed Consent by Proxy. An Issue in Research with Elderly Patients', New Engl. J. Med. 315, 124–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vollmann, J. Advance directives in patients with Alzheimer's disease; Ethical and clinical considerations. Med Health Care Philos 4, 161–167 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011491100267

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011491100267

Navigation