Skip to main content
Log in

Guarantees and Profit-Sharing Contracts in Project Financing

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 July 2014

Abstract

This paper proposes a model to study the arrangement of Islamic project finance with the participation of the government as a provider of loan guarantees. The owner-shareholders (musharakah certificate holders) initiate a project and raise funds by issuing Islamic profit-loss sharing mudarabah certificates. The government intervenes in providing financial guarantees in order to enhance the creditworthiness and increase the mudarabah capital capacity of the project. Our work raises several policy implications related to the structuring of Islamic project finance and the participation of both government and multilateral public agencies such as the Islamic Development Bank. It provides a unifying framework for the improvement of access to funds for Islamic projects and gives a rationale for government intervention in the arrangement of these projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Shariah is an Arabic word. And Shariah law is the legislative framework that regulates all aspects of life, both private and public.

  2. In fiscal year 2005 (as of September 2005), Export–Import Bank the export credit agency of the United States supported by project finance US $ 405 million in Qatar Liquified Gas Co. II, US $ 230 million dollar US in Egypt Basic Industries Corp. (EBIC) and US $ 263 million in Q-Chem II. (See Export–Import Bank of the United States website: http://www.exim.gov/products/guarantee/pfauth.html). On September 13, 2005, the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, MIGA, a private sector branch of the World Bank Group, said it issued $1.2 billion in investment guarantees (insurance) for 33 new projects (62 contracts) in developing countries during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005. (See MIGA website: http://www.miga.org/).

  3. Here flexibility over the investment amount means that the entrepreneur can maximize his net wealth from the project and decide on the amount to invest. Obviously, this is not contrary to the basic economic concept of decreasing returns to scale, as the entrepreneur will do so as long as the marginal gain to him outweigh the marginal cost. In our framework, we impose a minimum investment level to be done in the project, in that sense, the project is divisible beyond the minimum investment threshold.

  4. http://ifsb.org/terminologies.php.

  5. It is a guarantee by the bank or a third party on behalf of its customer, ensuring that his liabilities will be met.

  6. Note that there is no risk-free rate in Islamic finance, but as argued by some Islamic scholars, money deposited in an account and not used for investment can receive compensation for the opportunity cost or the deterioration in purchasing power for the depositor (e.g. Omar et al. (2010)). There is no common agreement among Islamic scholars on what rate should be applied as compensation. For instance, Aziz and Rahman (1999), among many other scholars, propose to use the zakat requirement (2.5 %) as a proxy for the risk-free rate in designing an Islamic version of the security market line. Jobst (2007) used a risk-free rate of 5 % to value securities under Islamic laws. Although, the author did not discuss the risk-free rate per se, one may suspect the risk-free rate to be equivalent to the inflation rate or opportunity cost. One may therefore legitimately take the inflation rate as an opportunity cost for the depositor. To be fair, it would be appropriate to provide the inflation rate to any money deposit in a bank account and not used for any specific project. This is a kind of risk sharing as well. As we have witnessed recently, real interest rate in the economy can be negative, which will imply negative returns for depositors and thus supporting the business cycle risk.

  7. See Hull (2008) for a general discussion on the use of risk neutral valuation in valuing real options and the estimation of λ. Schwartz and Moon (2000) propose a risk neutral pricing model of internet companies. Moreover, without loss of generally, we can assume the existence of a risk premium, μ−λσ, equals to any other rate than the inflation rate, π, and that won’t affect the main message of the paper.

  8. In our framework, we assume no intermediate payments before the maturity T of the project. However, if the intermediate cash flows have to be shared, this will require a modification to the option price as in Lai and Soumaré (2010) and the use of numerical methods to solve the problem. In addition, we do not address the issue of optimal capital structure for the project as done in Lai and Soumaré (2010), since it is not the main focus of our paper. Even with this simplified framework, our results raise important policy issues on the structuring of Islamic project finance with government intervention.

  9. From Eq. (5b), we can put together the expressions with D on the left hand side as follows: \( D - e^{ - \pi T} DN(y - \sigma \sqrt T ) = V_{0} (I)e^{(\mu - \lambda \sigma - \pi )T} \left[ {q(1 - \tau_{c} )N(x) + N( - y)} \right] - q(1 - \tau_{c} )e^{ - \pi T} IN(x - \sigma \sqrt T ) \), and next we divide the expressions on the left and right sides by \( (1 - e^{ - \pi T} N(y - \sigma \sqrt T )) \), which yields Eq. 6.

References

  • Ahmad, A. U. F., & Hassan, M. K. (2007). Riba and Islamic banking. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 3(1), 9–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, A. & Rahman, M. (1999). Capital budgeting and project financing in equity-based economies. In Proceedings of the Second Harvard University Forum on Islamic Finance: Islamic Finance into the 21st Century, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Harvard University (pp. 7–11).

  • Dailami, M., & Leipziger, D. (1998). Infrastructure project finance and capital flows: A new perspective. World Development, 26, 1283–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, M.-S. (1999). Integrating Islamic and conventional project finance. Thunderbird International Business Review, 41(4/5), 583–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhardt, D., & Irwin, T. (2004, April). Avoiding customer and taxpayer bailouts in private infrastructure projects: Policy toward leverage, risk allocation and bankruptcy, World Bank Policy Research Paper 3274 .

  • El-Gamal, M. A. (2000). A basic guide to contemporary Islamic banking and finance. Retrieved April 08, 2010, from Unpublished paper, Rice University: http://www.lariba.com/dev/knowledge-center/islamic-banking-guide.pdf.

  • Esty, B. C. (2004). Modern project finance. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, L. M. (2003). Principal-agency risk in project finance. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 547–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendron, M., Lai, V. S., & Soumaré, I. (2002). An analysis of private loan guarantee portfolios. Research in International Business and Finance, 16, 395–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. M., & Kreps, D. M. (1979). Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets. Journal of Economic Theory, 20, 381–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, M. K. (2002). Risk, return and volatility of faith-based investing: The case of Dow Jones Islamic index. Paper in Proceedings of 5th Harvard University Forum on Islamic Finance, Harvard University.

  • Hassan, M. K., Khan, A. N. F., & Ngow, T. (2010). Is faith-based investing rewarding? The case for Malaysian Islamic unit trust funds. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 1(2), 148–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, M. K., & Lewis, M. K. (Eds.). (2007). Critical writings in Islamic finance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, M. K., & Mahlknecht, M. (Eds.). (2011). Islamic capital markets: Products and strategies. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J. (2008). Options, futures, and other derivatives (7th ed.). Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobst, A. A. (2007). The economics of Islamic finance and securitization, IMF Working Paper # WP/07/117.

  • Khan, T. (2002). Financing build, operate and transfer (BOT) projects: The case of Islamic instruments. Islamic Economic Studies, 10(1), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleimeier, S., & Megginson, W. L. (2001). An empirical analysis of limited recourse project finance, Working Paper, The University of Oklahoma.

  • Lai, V. S., & Soumaré, I. (2010). Credit insurance and investment: A contingent claims analysis approach. International Review of Financial Analysis, 19, 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CFA Magazine (2005, March/April). Islamic finance: How new practitioners of Islamic finance are mixing theologie and modern investment theory, The CFA Institute Member Magazine for Investment Professionals.

  • McKenzie, D. (2010). Islamic Finance 2010. Retrieved April 22, 2010, from International Financial Services London: http://www.ifsl.org.uk/output/ReportItem.aspx?NewsID=32.

  • Merton, R. C. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance, 29, 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1977). An analytic derivation of the cost of deposit insurance and loan guarantees: An application of modern option pricing theory. Journal of Banking & Finance, 1, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C., & Bodie, Z. (1992). On the management of financial guarantees. Financial Management, 21, 87–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG Tax Monitor (2005, August). Islam and the tax code—should Ireland follow the UK’s lead? By brian daly, Finance Magazine, pp 1–5.

  • BBC News (2004). First UK Islamic Bank Opens Doors, Story from BBC News at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3676138.stm.

  • Omar, M. A., Noor, A. M., Meera, A. K. M., Manap, T. A. A., Majid, M. S. A., Zain, S. R. S., Sarif T. H. M. A. (2010). Islamic Pricing Benchmark, ISRA Research Paper No. 16/2010.

  • Schwartz, E. S., & Moon, M. (2000). Rational pricing of internet companies. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), 62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (1995). The World Bank Guarantee: Catalyst for Private Capital Flows, The World Bank Group, September.

  • The World Bank. (2002). The World Bank Guarantee: Leveraging Private Finance for Emerging Markets, Project Finance and Guarantees Department (January).

Download references

Acknowledgments

Issouf Soumaré gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Institut de Finance Mathématique of Montréal, the Fonds Québecois de la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture (FQRSC) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). We thank seminar participants at Laval University, the 2006 Asian FA/FMA annual meeting, 2006 Academy of Financial Services annual conference and 2008 Financial Management Association Meetings, and National University of Malaysia, 2012 for their helpful comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Kabir Hassan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kabir Hassan, M., Soumaré, I. Guarantees and Profit-Sharing Contracts in Project Financing. J Bus Ethics 130, 231–249 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2201-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2201-0

Keywords

Navigation