Skip to main content
Log in

Consensus conference on environmental values in radiation protection: a report on building consensus among experts

  • Review
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the fall of 2001 (October 22–25), The Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority (NRPA) and the Agricultural University of Norway arranged a consensus conference on the protection of the environment against ionising radiation. The motive for the conference was the need to study the ethical and philosophical basis for protection of nature in its own right. The conference was funded by Nordic Nuclear Safety Research (NKS), in cooperation with the International Union of Radioecology (IUR). The National Committee for Research Ethics in Science and Technology (NENT) was hired as facilitators for the consensus process. This paper will give a brief outline of the aims and method of the conference, distinguishing these from other kinds of consensus conferences. The paper ends with some general reflections on the appropriateness of seeking consensus on ethics-related issues among experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kantrowitz, A. (1993) Elitism vs. Checks and Balances in Communicating Scientific Information to the Public. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 4: 101.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  3. Task Force of the Presidential Advisory Group on Anticipated Advances in Science and Technology (1993) The Science Court Experiment: An Interim Report. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 4: 179.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klüver, L. (1995) Consensus conferences as the Danish Board of technology, in: Joss, S. & Durant J. (eds) 1995: Public participation in science: the roles of consensus conferences in Europe. London: the Science Museum. Fixdal, J. (1998) Public participation in technology assessment TMV-senter, University of Oslo skriftserie nr. 37, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klüver, L. (1995) Consensus conferences as the Danish Board of technology, in: Joss, S. & Durant J. (eds) 1995: Public participation in science: the roles of consensus conferences in Europe. London: the Science Museum, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a practical guide to consensus conferences see Eastlick, Deborah L. & Einsiedel, Edna F. (2000) Convening Consensus Conferences. A practitioner’s Guide, Calgary, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf. www.loka.org

  8. Cf. for example The National Committee on Research Ethics in Science and Technology (1996) Fast salmon and technoburgers.

  9. Funtowicz, S. & Ravetz, J. (1999) Post-Normal Science — an insight now maturing. Futures, 31/7: 641–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. European Commission COM (2001) European Governance — a White Paper.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matthias Kaiser or Ellen-Marie Forsberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaiser, M., Forsberg, EM. Consensus conference on environmental values in radiation protection: a report on building consensus among experts. SCI ENG ETHICS 8, 593–602 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0011-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0011-8

Keywords

Navigation