Abstract
During the fall of 2001 (October 22–25), The Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority (NRPA) and the Agricultural University of Norway arranged a consensus conference on the protection of the environment against ionising radiation. The motive for the conference was the need to study the ethical and philosophical basis for protection of nature in its own right. The conference was funded by Nordic Nuclear Safety Research (NKS), in cooperation with the International Union of Radioecology (IUR). The National Committee for Research Ethics in Science and Technology (NENT) was hired as facilitators for the consensus process. This paper will give a brief outline of the aims and method of the conference, distinguishing these from other kinds of consensus conferences. The paper ends with some general reflections on the appropriateness of seeking consensus on ethics-related issues among experts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kantrowitz, A. (1993) Elitism vs. Checks and Balances in Communicating Scientific Information to the Public. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 4: 101.
Ibid..
Task Force of the Presidential Advisory Group on Anticipated Advances in Science and Technology (1993) The Science Court Experiment: An Interim Report. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 4: 179.
Klüver, L. (1995) Consensus conferences as the Danish Board of technology, in: Joss, S. & Durant J. (eds) 1995: Public participation in science: the roles of consensus conferences in Europe. London: the Science Museum. Fixdal, J. (1998) Public participation in technology assessment TMV-senter, University of Oslo skriftserie nr. 37, Oslo.
Klüver, L. (1995) Consensus conferences as the Danish Board of technology, in: Joss, S. & Durant J. (eds) 1995: Public participation in science: the roles of consensus conferences in Europe. London: the Science Museum, p. 41.
For a practical guide to consensus conferences see Eastlick, Deborah L. & Einsiedel, Edna F. (2000) Convening Consensus Conferences. A practitioner’s Guide, Calgary, Canada.
Cf. www.loka.org
Cf. for example The National Committee on Research Ethics in Science and Technology (1996) Fast salmon and technoburgers.
Funtowicz, S. & Ravetz, J. (1999) Post-Normal Science — an insight now maturing. Futures, 31/7: 641–646.
European Commission COM (2001) European Governance — a White Paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaiser, M., Forsberg, EM. Consensus conference on environmental values in radiation protection: a report on building consensus among experts. SCI ENG ETHICS 8, 593–602 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0011-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0011-8