Abstract
There is substantial evidence to indicate that women have not been compensated fairly for their work when compared to men in similar positions. This article explores the gender biases built into the job evaluation process and the role this might play in explaining the wage gap. This exploration is also based on the review of the relevant literature on both sides of the comparable worth debate. In addition, the effects of market forces and organizational values in determining both wages and job structure is investigated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Behrooz Kalantari received his Ph.D. in Political Science in 1992 with a concentration in Public Administration. He also holds a Master in Public Administration and a bachelor in Public management. Presently teaching courses in the Public Administration program at North Carolina Central University in the United States. His major area of interest is Public Personnel Administration. He is presently studying how socialization affects job segregation and wage inequity.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalantari, B. Dynamics of job evaluation and the dilemma of wage disparity in the United States. J Bus Ethics 14, 397–403 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872101
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872101