Skip to main content
Log in

Identification in the limit of categorial grammars

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is proved that for any k, the class of classical categorial grammars that assign at most k types to each symbol in the alphabet is learnable, in the Gold (1967) sense of identification in the limit from positive data. The proof crucially relies on the fact that the concept known as finite elasticity in the inductive inference literature is preserved under the inverse image of a finite-valued relation. The learning algorithm presented here incorporates Buszkowski and Penn's (1990) algorithm for determining categorial grammars from input consisting of functor-argument structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajdukiewicz, K., 1935, “Die syntaktische Konnexität”, Studia Philosophica 1, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angluin, D., 1980a, “Finding patterns common to a set of strings”, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 21, 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angluin, D., 1980b, “Inductive inference of formal languages from positive data”, Information and Control 45, 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angluin, D., 1982, “Inference of reversible languages”, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 29, 741–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angluin, D. and Smith, C. H., 1983, “Inductive inference: theory and methods”, Computing Surveys 15, 237–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barendregt, H. P., 1992, “Lambda calculi with types”, in Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, Volume 2, S. Abramsky, D. M. Gabbay, and T. S. E. Maibaum, eds., Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, Y., 1953, “A quasi-arithmetical notation for syntactic description”, Language 29, 47–58. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, Y., 1960, “Some linguistic obstacles to machine translation”, reprinted in Bar-Hillel 1964.

  • Bar-Hillel, Y., 1964, Language and Information, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, Y., Gaifman, H., and Shamir, E., 1960, “On categorial and phrase structure grammars”, The Bulletin of the Research Council of Israel, vol. 9F, 1–16. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel 1964.

  • Buszkowski, W., 1987a, “Solvable problems for classical categorial grammars”, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Mathematics 35, 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buszkowski, W., 1987b, “Discovery procedures for categorial grammars”, in Categories, Polymorphism and Unification, E. Klein and J. van Benthem, eds., University of Amsterdam.

  • Buszkowski, W., 1988, “Generative power of categorial grammars”, in Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures, R. T. Oehrle, E. Bach, and D. Wheeler, eds., Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buszkowski, W. and Penn, G., 1990, “Categorial grammars determined from linguistic data by unification”, Studia Logica 49, 431–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., 1986, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David. 1988. Type raising, functional composition, and non-constituent conjunction. In Richard T. Oehrle, Emmon Bach, and Deirdre Wheeler, eds., Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M. E., 1967, “Language identification in the limit”, Information and Control 10, 447–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jongh, D. and Kanazawa, M., 1995, Learnability Theory, course material presented at the Seventh Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, University of Barcelona, August 1995.

  • Kanazawa, M., 1994a, Learnable Classes of Categorial Grammars, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University. Available as ILLC Dissertation Series 1994–8, Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation, University of Amsterdam (illc@fwi.uva.nl).

  • Kanazawa, M., 1994b, “A note on language classes with finite elasticity”, Reprot CS-R9471, CWI, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, S., 1991, Computational Learning of Languages, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University. Available as Technical Report 91-1234, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University.

  • Kearns, M. J. and Vazirani, U. V., 1994, An Introduction to Computational Learning Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J., 1958, “The mathematics of sentence structure”, American Mathematical Monthly 65, 154–170. Reprinted in Categorial Grammars, W. Buszkowski, W. Marciszewski, and J. van Benthem, eds., Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J., 1961, “On the calculus of syntactic types”, in Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects, R. Jakobson, ed., Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassez, J.-L., M. J. Maher, and K. Marriott. 1988. Unification revisited. In J. Minker, ed., Foundations of Deductive Databases and Logic Programming, pp. 587–625. Los Altos, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Leon S. and Aravind K. Joshi. 1978. Skeletal structural descriptions. Information and Control 39, 192–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R., 1973. “The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English”, reprinted in Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, R. H. Thomason, ed., New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriyama, T. and Sato, M, 1993, “Properties of language classes with finite elasticity”, in Algorithmic Learning Theory, Proceedings, 1993, K. P. Jankte, S. Kobayashi, E. Tomita, and T. Yokomori, eds., Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 744, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motoki, T., Shinohara, T., and Wright, K., 1991, “The correct definition of finite elasticity: Corrigendum to identification of unions”, p. 375 in The Fourth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osherson, D., Stob, M., and Weinstein, S., 1986, Systems That Learn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osherson, D., Weinstein, S., de Jongh, D., and Martin, E., 1994, “Formal learning theory”, to appear in Handbook of Logic and Language, J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen, eds.

  • Sakakibara, Y., 1992, “Efficient learning of context-free grammars from positive structural examples”, Information and Computation 97, 23–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinohara, T., 1990a, “Inductive inference from positive data is powerful”, pp. 97–110 in The 1990 Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinohara, T., 1990b, “Inductive inference of monotonic formal systems from positive data”, pp. 339–351 in Algorithmic Learning Theory, S. Arikawa, S. Goto, S. Ohsuga, and T. Yokomori, eds., Tokyo: Ohmsha, and New York and Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark J. 1985. Dependency and coordination in the grammar of Dutch and English. Language 61, 523–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark J. 1987. Combinatory grammars and parasitic gaps. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 403–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark J. 1988. Combinators and grammars. In Richard T. Oehrle, Emmon Bach, and Deirdre Wheeler, eds., Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K. and Culicover, P., 1980, Formal Principles of Language Acquisition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K., 1989, “Identification of unions of languages drawn from an identifiable class”, pp. 328–333 in The 1989 Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kanazawa, M. Identification in the limit of categorial grammars. J Logic Lang Inf 5, 115–155 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173697

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173697

Key words

Navigation