Skip to main content
Log in

Moral Judgment and Causal Attributions: Consequences of Engaging in Earnings Management

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent, well-publicized accounting scandals have shown that the penalties outsiders impose on those found culpable of earnings management can be severe. However, less is known about how colleagues within internal labor markets respond when they believe fellow managers have managed earnings. Designers of responsibility accounting systems need to understand the reputational costs managers impose on one another within internal labor markets. In an experimental study, 159 evening MBA students were asked to assume the role of a manager in a company and respond to a scenario in which another manager (the target manager) has the opportunity to engage in earnings management. Participants provided causal attributions, assessed the morality of the target manager, and indicated whether they would change their judgments about the target manager’s reputation. The study manipulated three between-subjects factors: (1) whether the target manager chose to engage in earnings management, (2) whether the company’s budgetary control system was rigid or flexible, and (3) whether the target manager’s work history was average or above average. We found that causal attributions are affected more by the budgetary systems when the target did not manage earnings than when the manager did. We also found that morality judgments were significantly associated with the target manager’s behavior, but not with the budgetary system. In addition, participants’ judgments about the target manager’s reputation were more strongly associated with morality judgments than with causal attributions. We discuss implications of the role of reputation in management control systems design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baginski S. P., Hassell J. M., Kimbrough M. D., (2004) Why Do Managers Explain Their Earnings Forecasts? Journal of Accounting Research 42(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker H., Fritzsche D. J., 1987 A Comparison of the Ethical Behavior of American, French and German Managers Columbia Journal of World Business 22:87–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt J. L., Campbell T. L., 1989 The Effects of Information Order and Hypothesis-Testing Strategies on Auditors’ Judgments Accounting, Organizations and Society 14:471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brower H. H., Shrader C. B., 2000 Moral Reasoning and Ethical Climate: Not-for-Profit vs. For-Profit Boards of Directors Journal of Business Ethics 26:147–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns W. J. Jr., Merchant K. A., 1990 The Dangerous Morality of Managing Earnings Management Accounting 72(2):22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D., Prusak L. 2001 Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Crant J. M., Bateman T. S., 1993 Assignment of Credit and Blame for Performance Outcomes Academy of Management Journal 36(1):7–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson W.N. III, Jiraporn P., Kim Y. S., Nemec C., 2004 Earnings Management Following Duality-Creating Successions: Ethnostatistics, Impression Management, and Agency Theory Academy of Management Journal 47(2):267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCarlo T. E., Teas R. K., McElroy J. C., 1997 Salesperson performance attribution processes and the formation of expectancy estimates Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 17:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey H. K., Chacko T. I., McElroy J. C., 1979 Attribution of the “Causes” of Performance: A Constructive, Quasi-longitudinal Replication of the Staw (1975) Study Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 24:287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky A. J., Skinner S. J., Whittler T. E., 1989 Evaluating Sales Personnel: An Attribution Theory Perspective Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 9:9–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Elig T. W., Frieze I. H., 1979 Measuring Causal Attributions for Success and Failure Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:621–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson D. J., Krull D. S., 1999 Distinguishing Judgments About What From Judgments About Why: Effects of Behavior Extremity on Correspondent Inferences and Causal Attributions Basic and Applied Social Psychology 21(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M., Rosenzweig K., 1995 Attitudes of Students and Accounting Practitioners Concerning the Acceptability of Earnings Management Journal of Business Ethics 14(6):433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flory S. M., Phillips T. J., Reidenbach R. E., Robin D. P., 1992 A Multidimensional Analysis of Selected Ethical Issues in Accounting The Accounting Review 67:284

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte A., 2004 Business Ethics: A Study of the Moral Reasoning of Selected Business Managers and the Influence of Organizational Ethical Climate Journal of Business Ethics 51:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green S. G., Mitchell T. R., 1979 Attributional Processes of Leaders in Leader–Member Interactions Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 23:429–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton V. L., 1980 Intuitive Psychologist or Intuitive Lawyer? Alternative Models of the Attribution Process Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(5):767–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. L.: 1983, ‘Person Perception’, in J.␣R.␣Hackman, E. E. Lawler III and L. W. Porter (eds.), Perspectives on Behavior in Organizations (McGraw Hill, New York, N.Y.), pp. 41–57

  • Healy P. M., Wahlen J. M., 1999 A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and its Implications for Standard Setting Accounting Horizons 13(4):365–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider F. 1958, The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger R. C., Clark J. P., 1983, Theft by Employees. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood A. G., 1972 An Empirical Study of the Role of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation Journal of Accounting Research 10:S156–S182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C.: January 8, 2001, ‘Why Pay People to Lie?’ Wall Street Journal, A32

  • Jones E. E., Nisbett R. E., 1972, The Actor and the Observer: Divergent Perspectives on the Causes of Behavior. In: Jones E. E., Kanouse D. E., Kelley H. H., Nisbett R. E., Valins S., Weiner B. (Eds) Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. General Learning Press, Morristown, N.Y. pp. 79–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S. E., 2001a Ethically Related Judgments by Observers of Earnings Management Journal of Business Ethics 32:285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S. E., 2001b Further Evidence on the Ethics of Managing Earnings: An Examination of the Ethically Related Judgments of Shareholders and Non-Shareholders Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 20:27–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S. E., Ravenscroft S. P., 2004 The Reputation Effects of Earnings Management in the Internal Labor Market Business Ethics Quarterly 14(3):453–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S. E., Reckers P. M. J., 1985 An Examination of Auditor Performance Evaluation The Accounting Review 60:477–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S. E., Reckers P. M. J., 1991 An Attributional Analysis of the Performance Evaluation Process Advances in Accounting 9:227-248

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S. E., Reckers P. M. J., 1993 An Examination of the Effects of Accountability Tactics on Performance Evaluation Judgments in Pubic Accounting Behavioral Research in Accounting 5:101–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley H. H. 1972 Causal Schemata and the Attribution Process. In: Jones E. E., Kanouse D. E., Kelley H. H., Nisbett R. E., S. Valins, Weiner B. (Eds) Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. General Learning Press, Morristown, N.J., pp. 151–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley H. H., Michela J. L., 1980 Attribution Theory and Research Annual Review of Psychology 31:457–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly J. E., 2004 Solidarity and Subsidiarity: “Organizing Principles” for Corporate Moral Leadership in the New Global Economy Journal of Business Ethics 52:283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr S., 1995 On the Folly of Rewarding A While Hoping for B Academy of Management Executive 9:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Kida T., 1984 The Impact of Hypothesis-Testing Strategies on Auditor’s Use of Judgment Data Journal of Accounting Research 22:332–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe D. J., Reckers P. M. J., Whitecotton S. M., 2002 The Effects of Decision-Aid Use and Reliability on Jurors’ Evaluations of Auditor Liability The Accounting Review 77:185–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord R. G., Smith J. E., 1983 Theoretical, Information Processing, and Situational Factors Affecting Attribution Theory Models of Organizational Behavior Academy of Management Review 8(1):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant K. A. 1998 Modern Management Control Systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant K. A., Rockness J., 1994 The Ethics of Managing Earnings: An Empirical Investigation Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 13:79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday R. T. 1983 Beliefs About the Causes of Behavior: The Motivational Implications of Attributional Processes. In: Steers R. M., Porter L. W. (eds) Motivation and Work Behavior. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, N.Y., pp. 352–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Noreen E., 1988 The Economics of Ethics: A New Perspective on Agency Theory Accounting, Organizations and Society 13:359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J., 1977 The Ambiguity of Leadership Academy of Management Review 2:104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckers P. M. J., Wong-on-Wing B., 1991 Management’s Motive and its Effect on Selected Audit Decisions Behavioral Research in Accounting 3:77–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeder G. D., Spores J. M., 1983 The Attribution of Morality Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44:736–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan D. T., Totten J., 1975 Empathy and Attribution: Turning Observers into Actors Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32:850–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson C. A., Darley J. M., 2002 “I am Moral, but You are Deterred”: Differential Attributions about Why People Obey the Law Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32:375–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer M. S., Singer A. E., 1997 Observer Judgments About Moral Agents’ Ethical Decisions: The Role of Scope of Justice and Moral Intensity Journal of Business Ethics 16:473–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw B. M., 1975 Attribution of the “Causes” of Performance: A New Alternative Interpretation of Cross-sectional Research in Organizations Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13:414–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan H.-T., Lipe M. G., 1997 Outcome Effects: The Impact of Decision Process and Outcome Controllability Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 10:315–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teas R. K., McElroy J. C., 1986 Casual attributions and expectancy estimates: A Framework for understanding the dynamics of salesforce motivation Journal of Marketing 50:75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotman K. T., Sng J., 1989 The Effect of Hypothesis Framing, Prior Expectations and Cue Diagnosticity on Auditors’ Information Choice Accounting, Organizations and Society 14:565–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Stede W. A., 2000 The Relationship Between Two Consequences of Budgetary Controls: Budgetary Slack Creation and Managerial Short-Term Orientation Accounting, Organizations and Society 25(6):609–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner B., 1985a “Spontaneous” Causal Thinking Psychological Bulletin 97(1):74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner B. 1985b Human Motivation. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong-on-Wing B., Reneau J. H., West S. G., 1989. Auditors’ Perception of Management: Determinants and Consequences Accounting, Organizations and Society 14:577–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles B. Shrader.

Additional information

Steven E. Kaplan received his B.S. degree from Arizona State University and his graduate degrees from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana. Professor Kaplan has published in numerous academic and professional journals, including Advances in Accounting, Cost and Management, Journal of Accounting Research, The Accounting Review, National Tax Journal, Management Accounting, and Auditing: A Journal of practice and Theory. His current research focuses primarily on auditor judgment. He is a member of the American Accounting Association. Professor Kaplan has two daughters, Leah and Serena. He enjoys trout fishing and bowling.

James C. McElroy is University Professor and the Bill and Liz Goodwin Faculty Fellow in the Department of Management at Iowa State University. He has a Ph.D. from Oklahoma State University, an MBA from the University of South Dakota and a B.S. from Jamestown College. Dr. McElroy has published over 55 refereed articles in a variety of journals including the Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Management, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Journal of Educational Computing Research and Computers in Human Behavior. He serves on the editorial review boards of the Journal of Vocational Behavior, Journal of Labor Research, and Journal of Managerial Issues. His current research deals with personality and computer use, self handicapping behavior, and technology as a form of object language.

Susan P. Ravenscroft is the Roger P. Murphy Professor Accounting and currently teaches managerial accounting and governmental and non-profit accounting. She and Professor Steve Kaplan have won the Glen McLaughlin Award for Research in Accounting Ethics. She has a PhD from Michigan State University. Dr. Ravenscroft’s research interests include ethics, pedagogical issues, and the social role of accounting information.

Charles B. Shrader is a Bill and Liz Goodwin professor of Management in the College of Business at Iowa State University. His PhD and MBA degrees are from Indiana University. His current research interests include the relationships of strategy, diversity, and corporate social responsibility with organizational performance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaplan, S.E., McElroy, J.C., Ravenscroft, S.P. et al. Moral Judgment and Causal Attributions: Consequences of Engaging in Earnings Management. J Bus Ethics 74, 149–164 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9226-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9226-y

Keywords

Navigation