Skip to main content
Log in

Łukasiewicz logic and the foundations of measurement

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The logic of inexactness, presented in this paper, is a version of the Łukasiewicz logic with predicates valued in [0, ∞). We axiomatize multi-valued models of equality and ordering in this logic guaranteeing their imbeddibility in the real line. Our axioms of equality and ordering, when interpreted as axioms of proximity and dominance, can be applied to the foundations of measurement (especially in the social sciences). In two-valued logic they provide theories of ratio scale measurement. In multivalued logic they enable us to treat formally errors arising in nominal and ordinal measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. D. Block &J. Marschak,Random orderings and stochastic theories of responses, in I. Olkin, S. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. Madow & H. Mann (eds.),Contributions to Probability and Statistics (Stanford: Stanford University Press), 1960, pp. 97–132.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. H. Coombs,A Theory of Data, New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Giles,A non-classical logic for physics,Studia, Logica 33 (1974), pp. 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Giles,Łukasiewicz logic and fuzzy set theory,International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 8 (1976), pp. 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. A. Goguen,The logic of inexact concepts,Synthese 19 (1969), pp. 325–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Katz,Difference measurement spaces, Queen's Math. Preprint 9, 1979.

  7. M. Katz,Real valued models with metric equality and uniformly continuous predicates, Queen's Math. Preprint 10, 1979.

  8. M. Katz,Inexact geometry,Notre-Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21 (1980), pp. 521–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. H. Krantz, R. D. Luce, P. Suppes &A. Tversky,Foundations of Measurement, New York: Academic Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. W. Lawvere,Metric spaces, generalized logic and closed categories,Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico e Fisico di Milano 93 (1973), pp. 135–166.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. D. Luce,Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination,Econometrica 24 (1956), pp. 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. F. S. Roberts,Indifference graphs, in F. Harary (ed.),Proof Techniques in Graph Theory, New York: Academic Press 1969, pp. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. S. Roberts,Tolerance geometry,Notre-Dame Journal of Formal Logic 14 (1973), pp. 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. S. Scott,Completeness and axiomatizability in many valued logic, in L. Henkin et al (eds.), Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Math. 25, Providence.) 1974, pp. 188–197.

  15. D. S. Soctt &P. Suppes,Foundational aspects of theories of measurement,Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1958), pp. 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Suppes &M. Winet,An axiomatization of utility based on the notion of utility differences,Management Science 1 (1955), pp. 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Suppes &J. L. Zinnes,Basic measurement theory, in R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush & E. Galanter (eds.),Handbook of Mathematical Psychology Vol. 1, New York: Wiley, 1963, pp. 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Tarski,What is elementary geometry, in L. Henkin, P. Suppes & A. Tarski (eds.),Symposium on the Axiomatic Method, Amsterdam: North Holland (1959), pp. 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, M. Łukasiewicz logic and the foundations of measurement. Stud Logica 40, 209–225 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02584056

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02584056

Keywords

Navigation