Skip to main content
Log in

On emergence, agency, and organization

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultimately we will only understand biological agency when we have developed a theory of the organization of biological processes, and science is still a long way from attaining that goal. It may be possible nonetheless to develop a list of necessary conditions for the emergence of minimal biological agency. The authors offer a model of molecular autonomous agents which meets the five minimal physical conditions that are necessary (and, we believe, conjointly sufficient) for applying agential language in biology: autocatalytic reproduction; work cycles; boundaries for reproducing individuals; self-propagating work and constraint construction; and choice and action that have evolved to respond to food or poison. When combined with the arguments from preadaptation and multiple realizability, the existence of these agents is sufficient to establish ontological emergence as against what one might call Weinbergian reductionism. Minimal biological agents are emphatically not conscious agents, and accepting their existence does not commit one to any robust theory of human agency. Nor is there anything mystical, dualistic, or non-empirical about the emergence of agency in the biosphere. Hence the emergence of molecular autonomous agents, and indeed ontological emergence in general, is not a negation of or limitation on careful biological study but simply one of its implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson Phil W. (1972) More is Different: Broken Symmetry and the Nature of the Hierarchical Structure of Science. Science 177:393–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins Peter W. (1984) The Second Law. Scientific American Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkenasy G., Jagasia R., Yadav M. and Ghadiri M.R. 2004. A self-organized synthetic chemical network, submitted

  • Bishop John (1983) Agent-Causation. Mind N.S. 92:61–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad C.D. (1925) The Mind and Its Place in Nature. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm Roderick M. (1976) The Agent as Cause. In: Myles Brand and Douglas Walton (eds) Action Theory. D. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton Philip (2004) Mind and Emergence: From Quantum to Consciousness. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley A.J., Girvin A., Kauffman S.A., Wills P.R., Yamins D. (2002) Simulation of Chemical Autonomous Agents. Z. Phys. Chem. 216:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche Claus, Kull Kalevi, Stjernfelt Frederik (2002) Reading Hoffmeyer, Rethinking Biology. Tartu University Press, Tartu, Estonia

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil John (2003) Multiply Realized Properties. In: Sven Walter, Heinz-Dieter Heckmann (eds) Physicalism and Mental Causation: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action. Imprint Academic, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer Jesper (1996) Signs of Meaning in the Universe, trans. Barbara J. Haveland, Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant Immanuel (1987) Critique of Judgment, trans. Werner S. Pluhar, Hackett, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman Stuart (1993) Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman Stuart (1996) At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman Stuart (2000) Investigations. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee D.H., Granja J.R., Martinez J.A., Severikn K., Ghadiri M.R. (1996) A Self-Replicating Peptide. Nature 382:525–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin Robert (2005) A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin Brian (1992) The Rise and Fall of British Emergentism. In: Beckerman A., Hans Flohr, Jaegwon Kim (eds) Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism. Walter de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod Jacques (1971) Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology, trans. Austryn Wainhouse, Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor Timothy (ed) (1995) Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky Edwina (ed) (1999) Semiosis, Evolution, Energy: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Sign. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber Andreas (2003) Natur als Bedeutung: Versuch einer semiotischen Theorie des Lebendigen. Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg Steven (1992) Dreams of a Final Theory. Pantheon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt William C. (1994) The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary 20:207–74

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright Georg Henrik (1971) Explanation and Understanding. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart Kauffman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kauffman, S., Clayton, P. On emergence, agency, and organization. Biol Philos 21, 501–521 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-9003-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-9003-9

Keywords

Navigation