Skip to main content
Log in

Stanley Peters and Dag Westerståhl: Quantifiers in language and logic

OUP, New York, 2006, 528 pp

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 February 2011

This article has been updated

Abstract

Quantifiers in Language and Logic (QLL) is a major contribution to natural language semantics, specifically to quantification. It integrates the extensive recent work on quantifiers in logic and linguistics. It also presents new observations and results. QLL should help linguists understand the mathematical generalizations we can make about natural language quantification, and it should interest logicians by presenting an extensive array of quantifiers that lie beyond the pale of classical logic. Here we focus on those aspects of QLL we judge to be of specific interest to linguists, and we contribute a few musings of our own, as one mark of a worthy publication is whether it stimulates the reader to seek out new observations, and QLL does. QLL is long and fairly dense, so we make no attempt to cover all the points it makes. But QLL has a topic index, a special symbols index and two tables of contents, a detailed one and an overview one, all of which help make it user friendly. QLL is presented in four parts: I, “The Logical Conception of Quantifiers and Quantification” with an introductory section “Quantification”. II, “Quantifiers of Natural Language”, the most extensive section in the book and of the most direct interest to linguists. III, “Beginnings of a Theory of Expressiveness, Translation, and Formalization” introduces notions of expressive power and definability, and IV, presents recent work and techniques concerning quantifier definability over finite domains, making accessible to linguists recent work in finite model theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 01 February 2011

    The authors of the Review Article of “Stanley Peters and Dag Westerståhl: Quantifiers in language and logic,” which appeared in Linguistics and Philosophy 33.6, regret that two paragraphs were omitted from the published version. These should be inserted on p. 544, following the four lines beginning Part 4, and just above (68), and are given below.

References

  • Bach, E. (eds) et al (1995) Quantification in natural languages. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker C. (1995) Possessive descriptions. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise J. (1978) On branching quantifiers in English. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 47–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise J., Cooper R. (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli F. (1994) Structured quantifiers. In: Kanazawa M., Piñón C. (eds) Dynamics, polarity, and quantification. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 119–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia G. (1992) Anaphora and dynamic binding. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 111–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1985) Knowledge of language. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple M., Kanazawa M., Kim Y., Mchombo S., Peters S. (1998) Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 159–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier G. (1975) Polarity and the scale principle. In: Grossman R.E., San I.J., Vance T.J. (eds) Proceedings of the 11th meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, IL, pp 188–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Alvarez I. (2003) Quantifiers in exceptive NPs. In: Garding G., Tsujimura M. (eds) WCCFL 22 proceedings. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA, pp 207–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach P. (1962) Reference and generality. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema J. (1996) The semantics of exception phrases. In: Does J., Eijck J. (eds) Quantifiers, logic and language. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 145–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein N. (1995) Logical form: From GB to minimalism. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson P. (1999) Towards a variable-free semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 117–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, P. A., & Vikner, C. (2002). The English prenominal genitive and lexical semantics. Ms., Dept of Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen Business School.

  • Kanazawa M. (1994) Weak vs. strong readings of donkey sentences and monotonicity inference in a dynamic setting. Linguistics and Philosophy 17: 109–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E.L. (1983) Some advantages of direct interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 335–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E.L. (1989) Semantic case theory. In: Bartsch R., Van Benthem J., Van Emde Boas P. (eds) Semantics and contextual expression Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics (GRASS). Vol. 11. Foris, Dordrecht, pp 33–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E.L. (1992) Beyond the Frege boundary. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 199–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E.L. (2003) The definiteness effect: Semantics or pragmatics?. Natural Language Semantics 11(2): 187–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E.L. (2005) Excursions in natural logic. In: Casadio C., Scott P., Seely R. (eds) Language and grammar: Studies in mathematical linguistics and natural language. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E.L. (2008) Voice and relativization without movement in Malagasy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26(3): 467–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. L., & Faltz, L. (1985). Boolean semantics for natural language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, Synthese Language Library.

  • Keenan E.L., Moss L.S. (1985) Generalized quantifiers and the expressive power of natural language. In: Benthem J., Meulen A. (eds) Generalized quantifiers in natural language. Foris, Dordrecht, pp 73–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E.L., Stavi J. (1986) A semantic characterization of natural language determiners. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 253–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W. (1979). Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

  • Ladusaw W. (1983) Logical form and conditions on grammaticality. Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 389–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1970) General semantics. Synthese 22: 18–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström P. (1966) First-order predicate logic with generalized quantifiers. Theoria 32: 186–195

    Google Scholar 

  • May R. (1989) Interpreting logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 387–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann F. (1995) Exception sentences and polyadic quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 223–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R. (1970). English as a formal language. In B. Visentini et al. (Eds.), Linguaggi nella società e nella tecnica (pp. 189–224). Milan: Edizioni di Comunità. (Reprinted in R. H. Thomason (Ed.), Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, pp. 188–221, 1974. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.)

  • Mostowski A. (1957) On a generalization of quantifiers. Fundamenta Mathematicae 44: 12–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam S. (2005) n-ary quantifiers and the expressive power of DP-compositions. Research on Language and Computation 3: 411–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paperno, D. (2009). On the syntax and the semantics of the hybrid coordination construction in Russian. MA Thesis, Department of Linguistics, UCLA.

  • Quine W.v.O. (1961) Logic as a source of syntactical insights. In: Jakobson R. (eds) Proceedings of the twelfth symposium in applied mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell B. (1908) Mathematical logic as based on the theory of types. In: Marsh R.C. (eds) Logic and knowledge: Essays 1901–1950. George Allen and Unwin, London, pp 57–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1976). Elimination of quantifiers in the semantics of natural language by use of extended relation algebras. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 117–118, 243–259.

  • Thomason Richmond H. (1974) Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. Conn. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Väänänen J., Westerståhl D. (2002) On the expressive power of monotone natural language quantifiers over finite models. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31: 327–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem J. (1986) Essays in logical semantics. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van der Does J. (1996) Quantification and nominal anaphora. In: von Heusinger K., Egli U. (eds) Proceedings of the Konstanz workshop “Reference and anaphoric relations”. Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, pp 27–56

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Wouden T. (1997) Negative contexts: Collocation, polarity, and multiple negation. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel K. (1993) Exceptive constructions. Natural Language Semantics 1: 123–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuber R. (2007) Symmetric and contrapositional quantifiers. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts F. (1981) Negatif polaire uitdrukkingen 1. GLOT 4: 35–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts F. (1998) Three types of polarity. In: Hamm F., Hinrichs E. (eds) Plurality and quantification. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 177–238

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denis Paperno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keenan, E.L., Paperno, D. Stanley Peters and Dag Westerståhl: Quantifiers in language and logic. Linguist and Philos 33, 513–549 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9086-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9086-5

Keywords

Navigation