Skip to main content
Log in

An Empirical Evaluation of the Effect of Peer and Managerial Ethical Behaviors and the Ethical Predispositions of Prospective Advertising Employees

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An advertising firm's ethical culture (as defined by the firm's managerial and peer ethical behaviors) may affect the employees' comfort levels and ethical behaviors. In this research, scenarios were used to describe advertising firms with various ethical cultures. Respondents' perceived comfort levels in working for the firms described in the scenarios and the respondents' behavioral intentions when faced with various advertising situations were assessed. Results of the study indicate that peer ethical behavior exerts a strong influence on the comfort or discomfort level and the ethical behavioral intentions of potential advertising employees. Further, the strong influence exerted by peers seems to transcend the ethical behavior of the manager and carry over to the attitude toward the entire corporate advertising environment. This study provides insights for firms and researchers interested in assessing the impact of an advertising firm's ethical culture on potential employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beltramini, R. F.: 1986, 'Ethics and the Use of Competitive Information Acquisition Strategies', Journal of Business Ethics 5, 307-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, D.: 1999, 'Ethics in Retail Buying and Retail Sales: Relationships Between Perceptions and Gender of Future Retail Personnel', Journal of Marketing Management 9(3) (Winter), 113-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J. and M. Levy: 1985, 'Ethics in Retailing: Perceptions of Retail Salespeople', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 13(1), 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPont, A. M. and J. S. Craig: 1996, 'Does Management Experience Change the Ethical Perceptions of Retail Professionals: A Comparison of the Ethical Perceptions of Current Students with Those of Recent Graduates', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 815-826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, S. and H. B. Stephenson: 1993, 'Decision Rules Used by Male and Female Business Students in Making Ethical Value Judgments: Another Look', Journal of Business Ethics 12, 227-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R. and C. D. Sutton: 1995, 'Unraveling the Ethical Decision-Making Process: Clues from An Empirical Study Comparing Fortune 1000 Executives and MBA Students', Journal of Business Ethics 14, 805-817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and L. B. Chonko: 1987, 'Ethical Problems of Advertising Agency Executives', Journal of Advertising 16(4), 16-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. E. and M. J. Kavanagh: 1996, 'An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 511-523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantos, G. P.: 1999, 'Motivating Moral Corporate Behavior', Journal of Consumer Marketing 16(3), 222-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luther, H. K., R. A. DiBattista and T. Gautchi: 1997, 'Perception of What the Ethical Climate Is and What It Should Be: The Role of Gender, Academic Status, and Ethical Education', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 205-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, C. and K. A. Berger: 1996, 'Undergraduate Student Attitudes About Hypothetical Marketing Dilemmas', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 525-535.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, F. S., J. L. Thomas and F. W. Gilbert: 1999, 'Consumer Segments and Perceptions of Retail Ethics', Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 7(2) (Spring), 43-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuddy, M. K. and B. L. Perry: 1996, 'Selected Individual Differences and Collegians' Ethical Beliefs', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 261-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. E.: 1998, 'Ethics in Advertising: Review, Analysis, and Suggestions', Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 17(2) (Fall), 316-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, C. B. and E. L. James: 1994, 'Advertising Ethics: A Contextual Response Based on Classical Ethical Theory', Journal of Business Ethics 13, 455-468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, C. B. and E. L. James: 1993, 'A Factor Analysis of Advertising Practitioners' Perceptions of Advertising Ethics', Psychological Reports 73 (December), 1307-1314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, L. S. and S. R. Valentine: 2000, 'College Students' Perceptions of Moral Intensity in Sales Situations', Journal of Education for Business ( July/August), 309-314.

  • Singhapakdi, A. and S. J. Vitell: 1991, 'Research Note: Selected Factors Influencing Marketers' Deontological Norms', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19(1) (Winter), 37-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, J. R. and M. Johlke: 1996, 'Factors Influencing Student Perceptions of Unethical Behavior by Personal Salespeople: An Experimental Investigation', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 871-887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. J.: 2001, 'Ethical Codes of Conduct and Organizational Context: A Study of the Relationship between Codes of Conduct, Employee Behavior and Organizational Values', Journal of Business Ethics 30, 185-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treise, D., M. F. Weigold, J. Conna and H. Garrison: 1994, 'Ethics in Advertising: Ideological Correlates of Consumer Perceptions', Journal of Advertising 23(3) (September), 59-72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keith, N.K., Pettijohn, C.E. & Burnett, M.S. An Empirical Evaluation of the Effect of Peer and Managerial Ethical Behaviors and the Ethical Predispositions of Prospective Advertising Employees. Journal of Business Ethics 48, 251–265 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000005786.09105.5c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000005786.09105.5c

Navigation