Skip to main content
Log in

Reproduction and the central project of evolutionary theory

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In much of the discourse of evolutionary theory, reproduction is treated as an autonomous function of the individual organism — even in discussions of sexually reproducing organisms. In this paper, I examine some of the functions and consequences of such manifestly peculiar language. In particular, I suggest that it provides crucial support for the central project of evolutionary theory — namely that of locating causal efficacy in intrinsic properties of the individual organism. Furthermore, I argue that the language of individual reproduction is maintained by certain methodological conventions that both obscure many of the problems it generates and serve to actively impede attempts to redress those difficulties that can be identified. Finally, I suggest that inclusion of the complexities introduced by sexual reproduction — in both language and methodology — may radically undermine the individualist focus of evolutionary theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abugov, R.: 1983, ‘Genetics of Darwinian Fitness: 1. Fertility Selection’, The American Naturalist 121, No. 6, 880–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, H., Byerly, H. C., Hopf, F. A., Michod, R. E., and Vemulapalli, G. K.: 1983, ‘The Darwinian Dynamic’, Quarterly Review of Biology 58, 185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodmer, W. F.: 1965, ‘Differential Fertility in Population Genetics Models’, Genetics 51, 411–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.: 1982, ‘The Levels of Selection’, in P. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.), PSA, 1982, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Mich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R. and Burian, R.: 1984, Genes, Organisms, and Populations, M.I.T. Press.

  • Byerly, H.: 1986, ‘Fitness as a Function’, Paper Presented at the P. S.A. Meetings, Pittsburgh, 1986.

  • Charlesworth, B.: 1970, ‘Selection in Populations with Overlapping Generations; 1. The Use of Malthusian Parameters in Population Genetics’, Theoretical Population Biology 1, No. 3. 352–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B.: 1980, Selection in Age-Structured Populations, Cambridge Studies in Mathematical Biology, vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Eng.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, F. B.: 1983, ‘The Definition and Measurement of Fitness’,in B. Shorrocks (ed.), Evolutionary Ecology; B. E. S. Symposium 23, 65–79.

  • Christiansen, F. B. and Feldman, M.: 1986, Population Genetics, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Palo Alto, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, F. B.: 1979, ‘Sex and the Single Organism’, Studies in the History of Biology 3, 139–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1976, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Eng.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denniston, C.: 1978, ‘An Incorrect Definition of Fitness Revisited’, Annals of Human Genetics, Lond., 42, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. M.: 1973, Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, Addison-Wesley, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J.: 1982, Gametes and Spores: Ideas about Sexual Reproduction1750–1914, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M., Christiansen, F. B., and Liberman, U.: 1983, ‘On Some Models of Fertility Selection’, Genetics 105, 1003–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A.: 1930, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Eng.; Dover, N.Y., 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadeler, K. P. and Liberman, U.: 1975, ‘Selection Models with Fertility Differences’, Journal of Mathematical Biology 2, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D.: 1975, ‘Innate Social Aptitudes of Man: An Approach from Evolutionary Genetics’, in R. Fox (ed.), Biosocial Anthropology, Malaby Press, London (reprinted in R. Brandon and R. Burian, Genes, Organisms, and Populations, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Ma., 1984, pp. 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, Philip W.: 1984, Genetics of Populations, Science Books, Int., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. and Dunn, L. C.: 1960, ‘The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse’, Genetics 45, 705–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michod, R. E.: 1985, ‘On Fitness and Adaptedness and their Role in Evolutionary Explanation’, J. Hist. Biol., in press.

  • Moran, P. A. P.: 1964, ‘On the Nonexistence of Adaptive Topographies’, Annals of Human Genetics, Lond., 27, 383–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, L. S.: 1949, ‘The Meaning of Fitness in Human Populations’, Annals of Eugenics 14, 301–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, E.: 1978, ‘With Selection for Fecundity the Mean Fitness Does Not Necessarily Increase’, Genetics 90, 383–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, E. and Kempthorne, O.: 1971, ‘Malthusian Parameters in Genetic Populations, II. Random Mating Populations in Infinite Habitats’, Theoretical Population Biology 2, 357–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, T.: 1965, ‘The Estimation of Fitness from Genotypic Frequencies’, Evolution 19, 546–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, Robt. E.: 1973, Ecology. Chiron Press.

  • Roughgarden, J.: 1979, Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction, MacMillan, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. and Lewontin, R.: 1982, ‘Artifact, Cause, and Genic Selection’, Philosophy of Science, 47, 157–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Sewall: 1980, ‘Genic and Organism Selection’, Evolution 34, 825–843.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am indepted to the Rockefeller Foundation for a Humanities Fellowship that supported this research during the spring of 1986. I am also grateful to Richard Lewontin, Diane Paul, and Lisa Lloyd for many extremely helpful conversations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, E.F. Reproduction and the central project of evolutionary theory. Biol Philos 2, 383–396 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127697

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127697

Key words

Navigation