Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scientization: putting global climate change on the scientific agenda and the role of the IPCC

  • Forum
  • Published:
Poiesis & Praxis

Abstract

Since the 1970s, climate change has dominated the international scientific and political agenda. In particular, the foundation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change at the end of the 1980s played a major role for the further enhancement of efforts in the field of climate change sciences. However, to understand the interaction of the worldwide coordination of climate change sciences as well as the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and its consequences, it is worthwhile to take a look at the self-conception of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s tasks and work. This paper gives an idea of the history of international climate change science, its representation in public discourse and the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by comprehensively illustrating its tasks, organization and self-image. Furthermore, the article tries to argue that the hitherto accepted concept of science followed within this body fails to integrate the idea of scientific ethics. It can be concluded that the conception of science represented by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has heavily influenced worldwide attention to climate change, its becoming part of the political agenda as well as the ethical consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Obviously, there are some discussions about the date of the first mention as explained by Connolley (2010).

  2. The finding that radiation reflected by the earth surface is partly absorbed depending on the trace quantities within the atmosphere. The original wording is: ‘‘The solar heat possesses the power of crossing an atmosphere but when the heat is absorbed by the planet, it is so changed in quality that the rays emanating from the planet cannot get with the same freedom back into space. Thus, the atmosphere admits the entrance of the solar heat but checks its exit, and the result is a tendency to accumulate heat at the surface of the planet.” (Tyndall cited after Graßl 2009b:5).

  3. Strictly speaking, Arrhenius has worked inversely with the definition and he rather feared a further ice age.

  4. Together with a group of scientists (for more information about this research process, see Weart 2009).

  5. By dissolution in seawater after a chemical reaction.

  6. Organized by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).

  7. However, this estimation was obviously far too optimistic.

  8. Which took place after the First Assessment Report of the IPCC, see below.

  9. Emphasis made by the author.

  10. All information collected has to be published and/or peer-reviewed in principle; however, also so-called grey literature is allowed as local knowledge consisting of non-published research from developing countries Dahan-Dalmedico (2008: 75). Due to the current debate on the mistakes within the IPCC reporting system, this aspect is reassessed (FAZ 2010).

  11. This is quite interesting considering that the founding organizations UNEP and WMO are organizations working in the field of natural sciences.

  12. A second aspect is the concept of science represented by the IPCC’s work, see below.

  13. “AR4 is the most comprehensive synthesis of climate change science to date. Experts from more than 130 countries contributed to this assessment, which represents 6 years of work. More than 450 lead authors have received input from more than 800 contributing authors, and an additional 2,500 experts reviewed the draft documents.” (UCSUSA 2007).

  14. That is with more than a 90% probability according to the AR4.

  15. Author's translation.

  16. Author's translation.

  17. As Luhmann points out, there is even a chapter in Bolin's book headed ‘possible climate change’ although the IPCC's work had shown a probability of more than 90% regarding the anthropogenic character of climate change Luhmann (2009b:38–39).

  18. See also Luhmann (2008b:167) for this argument.

  19. An Argentinian diplomat who was the later chairman of the World Climate Summit during the adoption of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997.

  20. That is, experimental reproduction etc.

  21. That is, using peer-reviewed publications etc.

  22. As well as the lack of an explicit mandate is declared.

  23. It may not be concealed that this view is not always followed and sometimes it is also mentioned that “dogmatic predictions regarding the Earth's future, are unreliable and can be politically counter-productive.” (Greeuw et al. 2000:7). However, most publications refer to the other view of scientific influence.

  24. The organization acts as a kind of supervisor for the international scientific landscape. It was for example involved as adviser at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in 1992 and the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in 2002.

  25. And an additional body as asked for by Evans et.al. (2009) would not be necessary if the IPCC would accept its scientific responsibility.

References

  • Alfsen KH, Skodvin T (1998) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and scientific consensus. How scientists come to say what they say about climate change. Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrhenius S (1896) On the influence of Carbonic Acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Phil Mag J Sci 41:237–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner T (1987) The politics of energy forecasting. A comparative study of energy forecasting in Western Europe and North America. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin B (2007) A history of the science and politics of climate change. The role of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brauch HG, Behera NC et al (2009) Facing global environmental change. Environmental, human, energy, food, health and water security concepts. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Callendar GS (1938) The artificial production of carbon dioxide and its influence on temperature. Q J R Meteorol Soc 64:223–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolley WM (2010) William M. Connolley’s page about Fourier 1827. Available at http://www.wmconnolley.org.uk/sci/fourier_1827/. Accessed 25 Feb 2010

  • Dahan-Dalmedico A (2008) Climate expertise: between scientific credibility and geopolitical imperatives. Interdiscip Sci Rev 33(171):71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2005) Climate change. Presidency conclusions. Available at http://europa.eu/cgi-bin/printbu.cgi?lng=en%26no=200503%26pt=i1010. Accessed 10 Nov 2009

  • Evans A, Steven D (2009) Hitting Reboot. Where next for climate after Copenhagen? New York

    Google Scholar 

  • FAZ (2010) Der Klimarat kommt auf den Prüfstand. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), No. 34, p. N1, 10th February 2010

  • Fourier BJB (1827) Memoire sur les temperatures du globe terrestre et des espaces planetaires. Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences Paris 7:569–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Graßl H (2009a) A discernible human influence on the global climate. How the IPCC affected climate politics. Gaia 18(3):255–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Graßl H (2009b) Klima und Energie—Die zentralen und kombinierten Herausforderungen des 21. Jahrhunderts. Blickpunkt Zukunft 29(52):4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeuw SCH, van Asselt MB et al (2000) Cloudy crystal balls. An assessment of recent European and global scenario studies and models. Experts’ corner report. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrin J, Hummel H et al (2007) Review of renewable energy on global scenarios. For the International Energy Agency IEA Implementing Agreement on Renewable Energy Technology Deployment (RETD). Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennicke P, Lovins AB (1999) Voller Energie. Vision: Die globale Faktor Vier-Strategie für Klimaschutz und Atomausstieg. Campus-Verlag, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoiberg DH, Goetz PW (eds) (2007) The new encyclopaedia Britannica. Micropaedia and Macropaedia. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton JT (ed) (1995) The science of climate change. Contribution of working group 1 to the second assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(98)00189-8

    Google Scholar 

  • ICSU (2002) Report of the scientific and technological community to the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD). Dialogue Paper to the Second Preparatory Committee for the WSSD 28 January to 8 February, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2009) Intergovernmental panel on climate change hompage. Available at http://www.ipcc.ch/. Accessed 25 Feb 2010

  • Koska T (2008) Schwarz auf weiß: Arbeit und Berichte des Weltklimarates (IPCC). Ursachen und Folgen. Available at http://www.bpb.de/themen/4ZAF0B.html. Accessed 10 Nov 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann H-J (2008a) Klimasensitivität, Leben und die Grenzen der Science-Kultur. Zum Vierten IPCC-Sachstandsbericht. Gaia 17(1):25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann H-J (2008b) Rückblick des Vorsitzenden auf sein Verständnis der Rolle des IPCC—der unwillig Diener. Bert Bolin: a history of the science and politics of climate change. The role of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft (IPG) der Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES) 4:162–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann H-J (2009a) Eine kleine Geschichte der schubweisen Aufhebung der Verdrängung des menschgemachten Klimawandels. In: Zybok O, Stange R (eds) Existenz am Limit: Kunst und Klimawandel, Köln, pp. 78ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann H-J (2009b) Wieviel hält die Erde aus? Sein oder Nicht-Sein des menschgemachten Klimawandels. Evangelische Aspekte 2:37–39

    Google Scholar 

  • NASA (2009) Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade. Available at http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/418335main_land-ocean-full.jpg. Accessed 25 Feb 2010

  • Patwardhan A, Schneider SH (2003) Assessing the science to address UNFCCC Article 2. A concept paper relating to cross cutting theme number four. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

    Google Scholar 

  • Prechtl P (1999) Metzler Philosophie-Lexikon. Begriffe und Definitionen. Metzler, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloterdijk P (2009) Wie groß ist „groß”? Welt Online, 17 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: UNEP

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House (1965) Restoring the quality of our environment. Report of the Environmental Pollution Panel—President’s Science Advisory Committee. Washington, DC

  • UCSUSA (2007) The IPCC: who are they and why do their climate reports matter. Available at http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/science/ipcc-backgrounder.html. Accessed 10 Nov 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCED (1992) Agenda 21. Kapitel 35: Die Wissenschaft im Dienst einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung. Available at http://www.agenda21-treffpunkt.de/archiv/ag21dok/kap35.htm. Accessed 8 Jan 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (1992) Text of convention. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Rio de Janeiro. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (1998) Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly (1988) Protection of global climate for present and future generations of mankind. Resolution A/RES/43/53 of the 70th plenary meeting. New York

  • WCED (1987) Our common future: report of the world commission on environment and development. Chapter 2: towards sustainable development. UN Documents A/42/427

  • Weart SR (2009) The discovery of global warming. Available at http://www.aip.org/history/climate/index.html. Accessed at 25 Feb 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • WMO (1989) The changing atmosphere. Implications for global security. Toronto, Canada, 27–30 June 1988. Geneva: Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This essay has been written as a result of a seminar chaired by PD Dr. Hans-Günther Brauch and held at the Free University of Berlin in November 2009 under the title “Climate Change Impacts: Securitization of Water, Food, Soil, Health, Energy and Migration”. Brauch and some seminar participants gave valuable comments on my work during the presentation of the results. Linus Mattauch and Stephan Richter-Bernburg helped me with language issues. Besides, my colleague Dr. Jochen Luhmann has provided an abundant pool of material and sacrificed much time to discuss this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarina Keller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, S. Scientization: putting global climate change on the scientific agenda and the role of the IPCC. Poiesis Prax 7, 197–209 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-010-0083-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-010-0083-5

Keywords

Navigation