This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Ayer, A. J.: 1971, Language, Truth and Logic, Pelican Books, Middlesex.
Earman, J. (ed.): 1983, Testing Scientific Theories, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Earman, J. (ed.): 1992, Bayes or Bust, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Gemes, K.: 1990, ‘Horwich, Hempel, and Hypothetico-Deductivism’, Philosophy of Science 57, 609–702.
Gemes, K.: 1990, ‘Hypothetico-Deductivism, Content, and the Natural Axiomatization of Theories’, Philosophy of Science 60, 477–487.
Gemes, K.: 1994, ‘Schurz on Hypothetic-Deductivism’, Erkenntnis 41, 171–181.
Gemes, K.: 1994a, ‘Explanation, Unification, and Content’, Nous 28, 225–240.
Gemes, K.: 1994b, ‘A New Theory of Content’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 23, 596–620.
Gemes, K.: 1997, ‘A New Theory of Content II: Model Theory and Some Alternatives’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 26, 449–476.
Gemes, K.: 1998, ‘Logical Content and Empirical Significance’, in P. Weingartner, G. Schurz and G. Dorn (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna.
Gemes, K.: 1998a, ‘Carnap-Confirmation, Content-Cutting, and Real Confirmation’, forthcoming.
Glymour, C.: 1980, Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Glymour, C.: 1980a, ‘Discussion: Hypothetico-Deductivism is Hopeless’, Philosophy of Science 47, 322–325.
Hempel, C. G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York.
Horwich, P.: 1983, ‘Explanations of Irrelevance’, in Earman 1983, pp. 55–65.
Schurz, G.: 1991, ‘Relevant Deduction’, Erkenntnis 35, 391–437.
Schurz, G.: 1994, ‘Relevant Deduction and Hypothetico-Deductivism: A Reply to Gemes’, Erkenntnis 41, 183–188.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hypothetico-Deductivism: The Current State of Play; the Criterion of Empirical Significance: Endgame. Erkenntnis 49, 1–20 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005355126725
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005355126725