Abstract
The current paper argues for synchronising spatial frames of reference for achieving effective multiparty communication in collaborative virtual environments. Synchronising nonverbal behaviour from different modalities is an important step for simulating face-to-face-interaction where all nonverbal cues are available. Such synchronisation also serves as an effective basis for building multimodal interfaces especially if these have to be deployed for multiparty communication. It is argued that common spatial reference frames are helpful in coordinating different points of attention and facilitating work by serving as the springboard for joint attention among members of the team. Consequently, it is desirable to aim for such common grounds and not just focus on coordinating disjointed virtual spaces for facilitating decision-making by reducing felt collaborative effort. Implementing the synchronisation of spatial reference frames for modern technologies thus serves dual purposes by achieving common grounds in communication and maintaining autonomy of each member at the same time. Towards this end, the current paper proposes the concept of decentred egocentric frame, the origin of which is one’s own body and the spatial relation between two objects is defined with respect to this origin. This frame seems to be important for separating each member’s focus from his own body (self/activities) and also helps in coordinating one’s focus with those of the others whether interacting verbally or nonverbally. This is an important conceptual development as the proposed classification is hypothesised to function in a similar manner across different sensory modalities. The paper concludes with issues on implementation and other future conceptual developments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Behrmann M, Geng JJ (2002) What is ‘left’ when all is said and done/spatial coding and hemispatial neglect. In: Karnath HO (ed) The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Benford S, Fahlen L (1994) Viewpoints, actionpoints and spatial frames. In: Proceedings of HCI. pp 409–423
Coluccia E, Mammarella IC, Beni RD, Ittyehrah M, Cornoldi C (2007) Remembering object position in the absence of vision: egocentric, allocentric and egocentric decentred frames of reference. Perception 36:850–864
Coluccia E, Mammarella IC, Cornoldi C (2009) Centred egocentric, decentred egocentric and allocentric spatial representation in the peripersonal space of congenital total blindness. Perception 38:679–693
Grush R (2000) Self, world and space: the meaning and mechanisms of ego- and allocentric spatial representation. Brain Mind 1:59–92
Halligan PW, Fink GR, Marshall JC, Vallar G (2003) Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect. Trends Cogn Sci 7:125–133
Levinson SC (2003) Space in language and cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Logan GD (1995) Linguistic and conceptual control of visual selective attention. Cogn Psychol 28:103–174
Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Tang JC, Minneman SL (1990) VideoDraw: A Video Interface for Collaborative Drawing. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI’90 conference on human factors in computing systems, (April 1–5), Seattle, Washington, pp 313–320, ACM, New York
Tapie J, Terrier P, Perron L, Cellier JM (2006) Should remote collaborators be represented by avatars? A matter of common ground for collective medical decision-making. AI Soc 20:331–350
Vertegaal R (1999) The GAZE Groupware System: Mediating Joint Attention in Multiparty Communication and Collaboration. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI’99 conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, Pittsburgh
Volcic R, Kappers AML, Koenderink JJ (2007) Haptic parallelity perception on the frontoparallel plane: An involvement of reference frames. Percept Psychophys 69:276–286
Acknowledgments
I am greatly indebted to my research supervisors Dr Anurika Vaish and Professor M.D. Tiwari at IIIT for their constant support. Part of this work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grant managed through the Graduate School of the Centre of Excellence “Cognitive Interaction Technology”, University of Bielefeld, Germany to the author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper was written while the author was at Centre of Excellence "Cognitive Interaction Technology" and Faculty of Psychology & Sports Science, University of Bielefeld, Germany.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khetrapal, N. Achieving common grounds in communication via interfaces: a role of spatial frames for reference. Poiesis Prax 7, 189–195 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-010-0084-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-010-0084-4