Abstract
In this paper, the political pamphlet “Der Hessische Landbote” by the eminent German author, Georg Büchner (1813–1837), will be positioned within the context of its political and historical background, analyzed as to its argumentative and stylistic structure, and critically evaluated. It will be argued that propaganda texts such as this should be evaluated by taking into account both rhetorical perspectives and standards of rational discussion. As far as argumentative structure is concerned, a modified version of the Toulmin scheme will be used for the description of three passages of the “Landbote”. As far as stylistic techniques are concerned, Büchner’s strategic use of some figures of speech, especially parallelism, metaphor and metonymy will be examined. As to the critical evaluation, the recently developed concept of “strategic maneuvering” within Pragma-Dialectics, the typology of argumentative dialogues established by D. Walton, and sets of critical questions will be used to assess the status of the arguments within the “Landbote” as potentially fallacious ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle: 2002, Rhetorik, transl. and comm. by Chr. Rapp, Akademie Verlag, Berlin
Balzer, B.: 1992, ‹Liberale und radikaldemokratische Literatur’, in V. Žmegač (ed.), Geschichte der deutschen Literatur, Vol. I/2, Hain, Frankfurt/M., pp. 277–335
Böhme, H.: 1987, ‹Georg Büchner oder Von der Unmöglichkeit, die Gesellschaft mittelst der Idee, von der gebildeten Klasse aus zu reformieren’, in Katalog der Ausstellung: Georg Büchner, Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, Frankfurt/M./Basel, pp. 8–15
Büchner, G.: 1834, Der Hessische Landbote. Erste Botschaft [Offenbach: Preller]. Faksimile des Originals, Beilage zu: Katalog der Ausstellung (1987), Georg Büchner, Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, Frankfurt/M./Basel
Cicero: 1976, De oratore/Über den Redner, ed. by. H. Merklin, Reklam, Stuttgart
van Dijk, T. A.: 1980, Textwissenschaft, dtv, München
Doury M.: 2004, La classification des arguments dans les discours ordinaires. Langage 154, 59–73
van Eemeren, F. H. (ed.): 2002, Advances in Pragma-Dialectics. SicSat, Amsterdam
van Eemeren F. H., R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
van Eemeren F. H., Rob Grootendorst: 2004, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
van Eemeren F. H., R. Grootendorst, F. Snoeck Henkemans: 1996, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
van Eemeren F. H., P. Houtlosser: 2002a, Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof. In van Eemeren F. H. (ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, SicSat, Amsterdam, pp. 13–28
van Eemeren F. H., P. Houtlosser: 2002b, Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance. In van Eemeren F. H., P. Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 131–159
van Eemeren F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2003, ‹More about Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Maneuvering: The Case of Tu Quoque’, in The [CD-rom] Proceedings of the IL@25 Conference at the University of Windsor, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario
van Eemeren F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2006, ‹Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation’, in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Perspectives on Strategic Maneuvering, Argumentation 20(4), 381–392
Franz, E. G.: 1987, ‹Im Kampf um neue Formen. Die ersten Jahrzehnte des Großherzogtums Hessen’, in Katalog der Ausstellung: Georg Büchner, Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, Frankfurt/M./Basel, pp. 38–48
Freeman J. B.: 2005, Systematizing Toulmin’s Warrants: An Epistemic Approach. Argumentation 19(3), 331–346
Gilbert M. A.: 2001, Emotional Messages. Argumentation 15(3), 239–249
Hauschild, J. Chr.: 1987, ‹»Gewisse Aussicht auf ein stürmisches Leben«. Georg Büchner 1813–1837’, in Katalog der Ausstellung: Georg Büchner, Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, Frankfurt/M./Basel, pp. 16–37
Hauschild J. Chr.: 2000, Georg Büchner. Rowohlt, Reinbek
Kienpointner M.: 1992, Alltagslogik. Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart
Kienpointner M.: 2005, Racist Manipulation within Austrian, German, Dutch, French and Italian Right-Wing Populism. In Saussure L. de, P. Schulz (eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 213–235
Kienpointner M.: 2006, Die Argumentationsmuster der Neuen Rhetorik. In Kopperschmidt J. (ed.), Die Neue Rhetorik. Studien zu Chaim Perelman. Fink, München, pp. 211–226
Kienpointner, M.: in print, ‹Zur Revolutionsrhetorik von Georg Büchner, Rosa Luxemburg und Wladimir I. Lenin. Eine vergleichende Analyse’, to appear in E. Hoffmann, et al. (eds.), Festschrift R. Rathmayr, Lang, Bern
Kopperschmidt J.: 1980, Argumentation. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart
Lakoff G.: 1987, Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Lakoff, G.: 2005, Don’t Think of an Elephant! Chelsea Green, White River Junction
Lakoff G., M. Johnson: 1980, Metaphors We Live by. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Mannheim K.: 1929, Ideologie und Utopie. Cohen, Bonn
Mayer, Th. M.: 1987, ‹Die >Gesellschaft der Menschenrechte< und Der Hessische Landbote’, in Katalog der Ausstellung: Georg Büchner, Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, Frankfurt/M./Basel, pp. 168–186
Perelman Ch., L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1983, Traité de l’argumentation. La Nouvelle Rhétorique. éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles
Plantin, Chr.: 1998, ‹Les raisons des émotions’, in M. Bondi (ed.), Forms of Argumentative Discourse, Clueb, Bologna, pp. 3–50
Schaub, G. (ed.): 1976, Georg Büchner, Friedrich Ludwig Weidig: Der Hessische Landbote. Texte, Materialien, Kommentar, Hanser, München
Schmid, K.: 2001, ‹Jesaja/Jesajabuch’, in H. D. Betz, et al. (eds.), Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart 4th ed., Vol. 4, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp. 451–455
Toulmin St.: 1958, The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Toulmin St., R. Rieke, A. Janik: 1984, An Introduction to Reasoning. Macmillan, New York
Wagner, G. W. J.: 1831, Statistisch-topographisch-historische Beschreibung des Großherzogthums Hessen, 4. Bd, Statistik des Ganzen, Leske, Darmstadt
Walton D. N.: 1992, The Place of Emotion in Argument. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park
Walton D. N.: 1996, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
Walton D. N.: 1998, Ad Hominem Arguments. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa
Walton D. N.: 1999, Appeal to Popular Opinion. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park
Walton D. N.: 2005, Deceptive Arguments Containing Persuasive Language and Persuasive Definitions. Argumentation 19, 159–186
Weiss D.: 2005, Stalinist vs. Fascist Propaganda. In: de Saussure L., P. Schulz (eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 251–274
Wiest, E.: 1987, ‹Die Lage der Darmstädter Bevölkerung im Vormärz’, in Katalog der Ausstellung: Georg Büchner, Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, Frankfurt/M./Basel, pp. 49–55
Zarefsky, D.: 2006, ‹Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric’, in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Perspectives on Strategic Maneuvering, Argumentation 20(4), 399–416
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kienpointner, M. Revolutionary Rhetoric: Georg Büchner’s “Der Hessische Landbote” (1834) – A Case Study. Argumentation 21, 129–149 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9043-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9043-1