Skip to main content
Log in

Revolutionary Rhetoric: Georg Büchner’s “Der Hessische Landbote” (1834) – A Case Study

Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the political pamphlet “Der Hessische Landbote” by the eminent German author, Georg Büchner (1813–1837), will be positioned within the context of its political and historical background, analyzed as to its argumentative and stylistic structure, and critically evaluated. It will be argued that propaganda texts such as this should be evaluated by taking into account both rhetorical perspectives and standards of rational discussion. As far as argumentative structure is concerned, a modified version of the Toulmin scheme will be used for the description of three passages of the “Landbote”. As far as stylistic techniques are concerned, Büchner’s strategic use of some figures of speech, especially parallelism, metaphor and metonymy will be examined. As to the critical evaluation, the recently developed concept of “strategic maneuvering” within Pragma-Dialectics, the typology of argumentative dialogues established by D. Walton, and sets of critical questions will be used to assess the status of the arguments within the “Landbote” as potentially fallacious ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle: 2002, Rhetorik, transl. and comm. by Chr. Rapp, Akademie Verlag, Berlin

  • Balzer, B.: 1992, ‹Liberale und radikaldemokratische Literatur’, in V. Žmegač (ed.), Geschichte der deutschen Literatur, Vol. I/2, Hain, Frankfurt/M., pp. 277–335

  • Böhme, H.: 1987, ‹Georg Büchner oder Von der Unmöglichkeit, die Gesellschaft mittelst der Idee, von der gebildeten Klasse aus zu reformieren’, in Katalog der Ausstellung: Georg Büchner, Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, Frankfurt/M./Basel, pp. 8–15

  • Büchner, G.: 1834, Der Hessische Landbote. Erste Botschaft [Offenbach: Preller]. Faksimile des Originals, Beilage zu: Katalog der Ausstellung (1987), Georg Büchner, Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, Frankfurt/M./Basel

  • Cicero: 1976, De oratore/Über den Redner, ed. by. H. Merklin, Reklam, Stuttgart

  • van Dijk, T. A.: 1980, Textwissenschaft, dtv, München

  • Doury M.: 2004, La classification des arguments dans les discours ordinaires. Langage 154, 59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F. H. (ed.): 2002, Advances in Pragma-Dialectics. SicSat, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren F. H., R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren F. H., Rob Grootendorst: 2004, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren F. H., R. Grootendorst, F. Snoeck Henkemans: 1996, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren F. H., P. Houtlosser: 2002a, Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof. In van Eemeren F. H. (ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, SicSat, Amsterdam, pp. 13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren F. H., P. Houtlosser: 2002b, Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance. In van Eemeren F. H., P. Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 131–159

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2003, ‹More about Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Maneuvering: The Case of Tu Quoque’, in The [CD-rom] Proceedings of the IL@25 Conference at the University of Windsor, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario

  • van Eemeren F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2006, ‹Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation’, in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Perspectives on Strategic Maneuvering, Argumentation 20(4), 381–392

  • Franz, E. G.: 1987, ‹Im Kampf um neue Formen. Die ersten Jahrzehnte des Großherzogtums Hessen’, in Katalog der Ausstellung: Georg Büchner, Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, Frankfurt/M./Basel, pp. 38–48

  • Freeman J. B.: 2005, Systematizing Toulmin’s Warrants: An Epistemic Approach. Argumentation 19(3), 331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert M. A.: 2001, Emotional Messages. Argumentation 15(3), 239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild, J. Chr.: 1987, ‹»Gewisse Aussicht auf ein stürmisches Leben«. Georg Büchner 1813–1837’, in Katalog der Ausstellung: Georg Büchner, Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, Frankfurt/M./Basel, pp. 16–37

  • Hauschild J. Chr.: 2000, Georg Büchner. Rowohlt, Reinbek

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienpointner M.: 1992, Alltagslogik. Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienpointner M.: 2005, Racist Manipulation within Austrian, German, Dutch, French and Italian Right-Wing Populism. In Saussure L. de, P. Schulz (eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 213–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienpointner M.: 2006, Die Argumentationsmuster der Neuen Rhetorik. In Kopperschmidt J. (ed.), Die Neue Rhetorik. Studien zu Chaim Perelman. Fink, München, pp. 211–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienpointner, M.: in print, ‹Zur Revolutionsrhetorik von Georg Büchner, Rosa Luxemburg und Wladimir I. Lenin. Eine vergleichende Analyse’, to appear in E. Hoffmann, et al. (eds.), Festschrift R. Rathmayr, Lang, Bern

  • Kopperschmidt J.: 1980, Argumentation. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G.: 1987, Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: 2005, Don’t Think of an Elephant! Chelsea Green, White River Junction

  • Lakoff G., M. Johnson: 1980, Metaphors We Live by. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim K.: 1929, Ideologie und Utopie. Cohen, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Th. M.: 1987, ‹Die >Gesellschaft der Menschenrechte< und Der Hessische Landbote’, in Katalog der Ausstellung: Georg Büchner, Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, Frankfurt/M./Basel, pp. 168–186

  • Perelman Ch., L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1983, Traité de l’argumentation. La Nouvelle Rhétorique. éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantin, Chr.: 1998, ‹Les raisons des émotions’, in M. Bondi (ed.), Forms of Argumentative Discourse, Clueb, Bologna, pp. 3–50

  • Schaub, G. (ed.): 1976, Georg Büchner, Friedrich Ludwig Weidig: Der Hessische Landbote. Texte, Materialien, Kommentar, Hanser, München

  • Schmid, K.: 2001, ‹Jesaja/Jesajabuch’, in H. D. Betz, et al. (eds.), Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart 4th ed., Vol. 4, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp. 451–455

  • Toulmin St.: 1958, The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin St., R. Rieke, A. Janik: 1984, An Introduction to Reasoning. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G. W. J.: 1831, Statistisch-topographisch-historische Beschreibung des Großherzogthums Hessen, 4. Bd, Statistik des Ganzen, Leske, Darmstadt

  • Walton D. N.: 1992, The Place of Emotion in Argument. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton D. N.: 1996, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton D. N.: 1998, Ad Hominem Arguments. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton D. N.: 1999, Appeal to Popular Opinion. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton D. N.: 2005, Deceptive Arguments Containing Persuasive Language and Persuasive Definitions. Argumentation 19, 159–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss D.: 2005, Stalinist vs. Fascist Propaganda. In: de Saussure L., P. Schulz (eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 251–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiest, E.: 1987, ‹Die Lage der Darmstädter Bevölkerung im Vormärz’, in Katalog der Ausstellung: Georg Büchner, Stroemfeld/Roter Stern, Frankfurt/M./Basel, pp. 49–55

  • Zarefsky, D.: 2006, ‹Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric’, in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Perspectives on Strategic Maneuvering, Argumentation 20(4), 399–416

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred Kienpointner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kienpointner, M. Revolutionary Rhetoric: Georg Büchner’s “Der Hessische Landbote” (1834) – A Case Study. Argumentation 21, 129–149 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9043-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9043-1

Keywords

Navigation