Abstract
All children learn or acquire their first language during a relatively short period in childhood. Individual variation or differences in learning environments seem to have very little influence on this process. Basically, every human being acquires a native language in essentially the same way. These facts have long puzzled linguists and psychologists. Generally speakin, there have been two competing accounts of this phenomenon, the empiricist’s story and the nativist’s story.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ariew, A. (1996). Innateness and Canalization. Philosophy of Science 63: 19–27.
Ariew, A. (1999). Innateness Is Canalization: In Defense of a Developmental Account of Innateness. In Hardcastle 1999: 117–138.
Ariew, A. (unpublished): Innateness as Triggering: Biologically Grounded Nativism. http://www.uri.edu/artsci/phl/triggering.htm#_ftn1.
Bateson, P. (1991). Are There Principles of Behavioural Development?. In Patrick Bateson (ed.), The Development and Integration of Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:19–39.
Bjorklund, D. F. and Pellegrini, A. D. (2001). The Origins of Human Nature. Evolutionary Developmental Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cartwright, J. (2000). Evolution and Human Behaviour. Darwinian Perspectives on Human Nature. New York: Palgrave.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. Praeger: New York.
Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, J. (2003). Cowie on the Poverty of Stimulus. Synthese 136: 159–190.
Cowie, F. (1999). What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered. Oxford: The Oxford University Press.
Crain, S. and P. Pietroski. (2001). Nature, Nurture and Universal Grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 139–186.
Elfman, J., E. Bates, M. Johnson et al. (1996). Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Journal of Consciousness Studies 5: 117–119.
Fodor, J. (2001). Doing Without What’s Within: Fiona Cowie’s Critique of Nativism. Mind 110: 99–148.
Fodor, J., T. Bever and M. Garrett. (1974). The Psychology of Language. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationst Programme. Proceedings of Royal Society of London 205: 581–598.
Griffiths, P. E. (2002). What Is Innateness? The Monist 85: 70–85.
Griffiths, P. E. and R. D. Gray (1994). Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation. Journal of Philosophy 91: 277–304.
Hardcastle, V. G. (ed.) (1999). Where Biology Meets Psychology: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Horvath, C. (2000). Interactionism and Innateness in the Evolutionary Study of Human Nature. Biology and Philosophy 15: 321–337.
Khalidi, M. A. (2002). Nature and Nurture in Cognition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53: 251–272.
Laurence, S. and E. Margolis (2001). The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52: 217–276.
Lewontin, R. (1974). The Analysis of Variance and the Analysis of Causes. American Journal of Human Genetics 26: 400–411.
Mameli, M., and P. Bateson (forthcoming). Innateness and the Sciences. Biology and Philosophy.
Moore, D. S. (2003). The Dependent Gene. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Putnam, H. (1967). The ‘Innateness Hypothesis’ and Explanatory Models in Linguistics. Synthese 17: 12–22.
Samuels, R. (2002). Nativism in Cognitive Science. Mind and Language 17: 233–265.
Samuels, R. (2004). Innateness in Cognitive Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 136–141.
Sober, E. (1988). Apportioning Causal Responsibility. Journal of Philosophy 85: 303–318.
Sober, E. (1998). Innate Knowledge. In Craig (ed.): Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge: 794–797.
Stich, S. (1975). The Idea of Innateness. In Stich (ed.): Innate Ideas. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Stromsworld, K. (1999). Cognitive and Neural Aspects of Language Acquisition. In Lepore and Pylyshyn (eds.): What is Cognitive Science? Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers: 356–400.
West-Eberhardt, M. J. (2003). Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wimsatt, W. C. (1999). Generativity, Entrenchment, Evolution, and Innateness: Philosophy, Evolutionary Biology, and Conceptual Foundations of Science. In Hardcastle (ed.) (1999): 139–180.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
KIIKERI, M., KOKKONEN, T. (2007). BIOLOGICAL NOTIONS OF INNATENESS AND EXPLANATION OF LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. In: PERSSON, J., YLIKOSKI, P. (eds) RETHINKING EXPLANATION. BOSTON STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, vol 252. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5581-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5581-2_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5580-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5581-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)