Abstract
Most previous works on responsible conduct of research have focused on good practices in laboratory experiments. Because computation now rivals experimentation as a mode of scientific research, we sought to identify the responsibilities of researchers who develop or use computational modeling and simulation. We interviewed nineteen experts to collect examples of ethical issues from their experiences in conducting research with computational models. We gathered their recommendations for guidelines for computational research. Informed by these interviews, we describe the respective professional responsibilities of developers and users of computational models in research. In particular, we examine whether developers should disclose the full computational codes, and we explain how developers and users should minimize harms from improper uses of models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. E., Johnson, D. G., Gotterbarn, D., & Perrole, J. (1993). Using the new ACM code of ethics in decision making. Communications of the ACM, 36(2), 98–107.
Arnold, D. N. (2000). The Patriot Missile failure. Retrieved October 3, 2010 from http://www.ima.umn.edu/~arnold/disasters/patriot.html.
Collins, W. R., Miller, K. W., Spielman, B. J., & Wherry, P. (1994). How good is good enough? An ethical analysis of software construction and use. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 81–91.
Collins, M. P., Vecchio, F. J., Selby, R. G., & Gupta, P. R. (2000). Failure of an offshore platform. Canadian Consulting Engineer, 2000, 43–48.
Fleischmann, K. R., & Wallace, W. A. (2005). A covenant with transparency: Opening the black box of models. Communications of the ACM, 48(5), 93–97.
Free Software Foundation. (2010). Philosophy of the GNU project. Retrieved June 3, 2011, from http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/.
Gotterbarn, D., Miller, K., & Rogerson, S. (1999). Software engineering code of ethics is approved. Communications of the ACM, 42(10), 102–107.
Heckel, P. (1992). Debunking the software patent myths. Communications of the ACM, 35(6), 121–140.
Higham, N. (2002). Accuracy and stability of numerical algorithms (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, Pa.: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Intel. (2010). Intel and floating point. intel.com. Retrieved June 4, 2010, from http://www.intel.com/standards/floatingpoint.pdf.
Johnson, D. G., & Mulvey, J. M. (1995). Accountability and computer decision systems. Communications of the ACM, 38(12), 58–64.
Kijowski, D. J. (2010). Responsible conduct of research with computational models and simulations. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (IDEALS). Retrieved May 25, 2011, from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/18349.
Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2001). Ethical issues in modeling: some reflections. European Journal of Operations Research, 130, 223–230.
Kleijnen, J. (2010). Ethical issues in engineering models: an operations researcher’s reflections. Science and Engineering Ethics. http://www.springerlink.com/content/h66701url5934g34/.
Le Menestrel, M., & Van Wasssenhove, L. N. (2004). Ethics outside, within, or beyond OR models? European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 477–484.
Levey, D. (2008). IAP class probes Singapore highway collapse. TechTalk: Serving the MIT Community, 52(15), 5.
Macrina, F. L. (2005). Scientific integrity: text and cases in responsible conduct of research (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology Press.
Martin, R. (1999). Hartford civic center arena roof collapse. Retrieved October 3, 2010, from http://matdl.org/failurecases/Building%20Cases/Hartford.htm.
McCullough, B. D., & Vinod, H. D. (1999). The numerical reliability of econometric software. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(2), 633–665.
Raymond, E. (2001). The cathedral and the bazaar. In R. A. Spinello & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), Readings in cyberethics (pp. 309–338). Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
Sargent, R. G. (2007). Verification and validation of simulation models. Proceedings—Winter Simulation Conference, art. no. 4419595, pp. 124–137.
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2003). Responsible conduct of research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shepherd, R., & Frost, J. D. (1995). Failures in civil engineering: structural foundation and geoenvironmental case studies. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Society for Modeling and Simulation International. (2010). SCS code of ethics. Retrieved June 5, 2011, from http://www.scs.org/ethics.
Steneck, N. H. (2004). ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Rockville, Md.: Office of Research Integrity. Retrieved September 26, 2010, from http://ori.dhhs.gov/publications/ori_intro_text.shtml.
Vandenberghe, L. (2009). Problem conditioning and stability of algorithms. UCLA.edu. Retrieved August 14, 2010, from http://www.ee.ucla.edu/~vandenbe/103/lectures/accuracy.pdf.
Wallace, W. A. (Ed.). (1994). Ethics in modeling. Oxford, UK: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.
Yang, G. C. (2005). The continuing debate of software patents and the open source movement. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 13, 171–207.
Acknowledgments
We thank Matthew Keefer and Sara Wilson for helpful suggestions. We thank the computational modeling experts for the interviews. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant IIS-0832843.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, Exelon Corporation, or the University of Illinois.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kijowski, D.J., Dankowicz, H. & Loui, M.C. Observations on the Responsible Development and Use of Computational Models and Simulations. Sci Eng Ethics 19, 63–81 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9291-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9291-1