Abstract
This squib aims to show that the acceptability status of sluicing examples with an implicit antecedent in islands varies and discusses what is responsible for this variability. After investigating two representative structural approaches to sluicing that posit unpronounced structure in ellipsis sites, namely, Chung et al.’s (Nat Lang Semant 3:239–282, 1995; in Mikkelsen et al. (eds) Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen, 2010) LF-recovery analysis and Merchant’s (The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2001) PF-deletion analysis, we demonstrate that the acceptability data presented are challenging for both of them. Acceptable sluicing examples with implicit correlates in islands cast doubt on Chung, Ladusaw, and McCloskey’s strict locality requirement, while unacceptable or degraded sluicing examples necessitate additional constraints for Merchant, who employs E-type anaphora as an escape hatch for island violations in sluicing. The gradient nature of the acceptability status of the examples under discussion calls for a non-structural factor that controls their acceptability. We speculate that it is discourse activation of implicit correlates that plays this crucial role.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, Chris. 1993. Sluicing and weak islands. Ms., University of California, Santa Cruz.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993. Principles and parameters theory. In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, ed.J. Jacobs et al., 506–570. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chung, Sandra, William Ladusaw, and James McCloskey. 1995. Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3: 239–282.
Chung, Sandra, William Ladusaw, and James McCloskey. 2010. Sluicing(:) Between structure and inference. In Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen, ed. Line Mikkelsen, Eric Potsdam, and Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center Publications.
Culicover, Peter, and Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalrymple, Mary, Stuart M. Sheiber, and Fernando C.N. Pereira, 1991. Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 399–452.
Erteschik-Shir, Naomi. 2007. Information structure: The syntax–discourse interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erteschik-Shir, Naomi. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Erteschik-Shir, Naomi, and Shalom Lappin. 1979. Dominance and the functional explanation of island phenomena. Theoretical Linguistics 6: 41–85.
Fox, Danny. 2000. Economy and semantic interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fox, Danny, and Howard Lasnik. 2003. Successive cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143–164.
Ginzburg, Jonathan, and Ivan Sag. 2000. Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Hardt, Daniel, and Marbel Romero. 2004. Ellipsis and the structure of discourse. Journal of Semantics 21: 375–414.
Hendriks, Petra, and Helen de Hoop. 2001. Optimality theoretic semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 1–32.
Kennedy, Christopher, and Jason Merchant. 2000. Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 89–146.
Kuno, Susumu, and Jane Robinson. 1972. Multiple Wh-questions. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 463–497.
Lasnik, Howard. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Proceedings of NELS 31(2), ed. M. Kim and U. Strauss, 301–320. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661–738.
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In The representation of (in)definiteness, ed. E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen, 98–130. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Romero, Maribel. 1998. Focus and reconstruction effects in wh-phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Ross, John Robert. 1969. Guess who? In Papers from the CLS 5, ed. Robert I. Binnick et al., 252–286. Chicago: The Chicago Linguistic Society.
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2007. What lies beneath: the hidden syntax of sluicing. Talk given at New York University, December 2007.
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1978. A case study in syntactic markedness: the binding nature of prepositional phrases. Dordrecht: Foris.
Wasow, Thomas. 1972. Anaphoric relations in English. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, SY., Kuno, S. A note on sluicing with implicit indefinite correlates. Nat Lang Semantics 21, 315–332 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-012-9094-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-012-9094-1