Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Humanoid robots as “The Cultural Other”: are we able to love our creations?

  • 25th Anniversary Volume A Faustian Exchange: What is to be human in the era of Ubiquitous Technology?
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robot enthusiasts envision robots will become a “race unto themselves” as they cohabit with the humankind one day. Profound questions arise surrounding one of the major areas of research in the contemporary world—that concerning artificial intelligence. Fascination and anxiety that androids impose upon us hinges on how we come to conceive of the “Cultural Other.” Applying the notion of the “other” in multicultural research process, we will explore how the “Other” has been used to illustrate values and theories about robots, as a mirror for the self. In this paper, we focus on the social, cultural, and religious implications of humans’ attitudes toward relationships between humans with robots. Six major views on humanoid robots are proposed: (1) robots as the “Frightening Other,” (2) robots as the “Subhuman Other,” (3) robots as the “Human Substitute,” (4) robots as the “Sentient Other,” (5) robots as the “Divine Other,” and (6) robots as the “Co-evolutionary Path to Immortality.” The likely and preferable scenario is the last one, which is compatible with an optimistic posthuman world in our evolutionary future. We imagine whether humans will meet the challenge of loving all living and non-living beings (including mechanical entities) might be the key to the co-evolution of both species and the ultimate happiness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amodio DM, Harmon-Jones E, Devine PG, Curtin JJ, Hartley SL, Covert AE (2011) Neural signals for the detection of unintentional race bias. Psychol Sci 15:88–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amstutz G (1998) Shin Buddhism and Protestant analogies with Christianity in the West. Comp Stud Soc Hist 40:724–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartneck C, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Nomura T (2007) The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI Soc 21:217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billard A (2005) Challenges in designing the body and the mind of an interactive robot. In: Proceedings of the symposium on robot companions: hard problems and open challenges in robot-human interaction, pp 16–17

  • Breazeal C (2003) Toward sociable robots. Rob Auton Syst 42:167–175

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RA (2002) Flesh and machines: how robots will change us. Pantheon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns C (2003) “Soul-less” Christianity and the Buddhist empirical self: Buddhist–Christian convergence? Buddhist Christ Stud 23:87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calverley D (2006) Android science and animal rights, does an analogy exist. Connect Sci 18:403–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb JJ (1998) Cybergrace: the search for god in the digital world. Crown, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook FH (1989) Sounds of valley streams: enlightenment in Dogen’s Zen, translation of nine essays from Shobogenzo. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen T, Dawson M (2009) What does the Turing test really mean? And how many human beings (including Turing) could pass? Accessed 4 Oct 2011

  • Dalai Lama (1997) Interview with Jeff Greenwald. Salon Magazine, 27 Feb 1997

  • Dator J (2007) Religion and war in the 21st century. In: Tenri Daigaku Chiiki Bunka Kenyu Center (ed) Senso, Shukyo, Heiwa [War, Religion, Peace], Tenri Daigaku 80 Shunen Kinen [Tenri University 80th anniversary celebration]. Tenri Daigaku, Tenri-Shi, pp 34–51

  • Dator J, Seo Y (2004) Korea as the wave of a future: the emerging Dream Society of icons and aesthetic experience. J Futures Stud 9:31–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis E (1998) TechGnosis: myth, magic, and mysticism in the age of information. Harmony Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinello D (2005) Technophobia!: science fiction visions of Posthuman technology. University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy BR (2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Rob Auton Syst 42:177–190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske ST (2010) Are we born racist?. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerst A (1998a) Embodied AI, creation, and cog. Zygon J Relig Sci 33:455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foerst A (1998b) Cog, a humanoid robot, and the question of the image of god. Zygon J Relig Sci 33:91–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foerst A (2004) God in the machine: what robots teach us about humanity and god. Dutton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler C (2004) The archaeology of personhood: an anthropological approach. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraci R (2006) Spiritual robots: religion and our scientific view of the natural world. Theol Sci 4:229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraci RM (2007) Robots and the sacred in science and science fiction: theological implications of artificial intelligence. Zygon J Relig Sci 42:961–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraci RM (2010) Apocalyptic AI: visions of heaven in robotics, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong L (2008) The boundary of racial prejudice: comparing preferences for computer-synthesized White, Black, and robot characters. Comput Hum Behav 24:2074–2093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst WB, Kim YY (1984) Communicating with strangers: an approach to intercultural communication, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulerce A (1997) Agendas for multicultural discourse research. In: Shi-xu (ed) Discourse and cultural struggle. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 29–46

  • Hall S (1997) Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway DJ (1991) Simians, cyborgs, and women. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris LT, Fiske ST (2006a) Social groups that elicit disgust are differentially processed in mPFC. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2:45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris LT, Fiske ST (2006b) Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychol Sci 17:847–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam N (2006) Dehumanization: an integrative review. Person Soc Psychol Rev 10(3):252–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro H, Kanda T, Hirano T, Eaton D (2004) Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: a field trial. Hum Comput Interact 19:61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon SH (2008) Would you still love me if I was a robot? J Evol Technol 19:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim MS, Sur J, Gong L (2009) Humans and humanoid social robots in communication. AI Soc 24:317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim MS, Gong L, Saito N, Nishigaya K, Cabico M, LaFontaine P (2011) The role of self-construal on preferred communication styles with humanoid robots. Int J HR 8:359–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubrick S (1968, Sept). Interview by Eric Norden, Playboy. Reprinted in: Phillips GD (ed) Stanley Kubrick: Interviews. University Press of Mississippi, 2001, pp 47–48

  • Kurzweil R (2000) The age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed human intelligence. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas E, Cohen RA (translator) (1985) Ethics and infinity. Duquesne University Press

  • MacDorman KF, Ishiguro H (2006) Opening Pandora’s uncanny box: reply to commentaries on “The uncanny advantage of using androids in social and cognitive science research”. Interact Stud 7:361–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraith JF (2007, Sept) Artificial minds and human religions: an illustration of the diversity of possible intersections between religious thought and practice and technological advance. Paper presented to the Transdisciplinary approaches of the dialogue between science, art and religion in the Europe of tomorrow (edited by Nicolescu B, Stavinschi M)

  • McGraith JF (ed) (2011) Religion and science fiction. Pickwick, Eugene

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec H (2000) Robot: mere machine to transcendent mind. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morioka M (1991) The concept of Inochi: a philosophical perspective on the study of life. Jpn Rev 2:83–115

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson V (2001) The secret life of puppets. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nongkynrih KS (ed) (2007) Around the hearth: Khasi legends. Penguin Books, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto R (1917/1923) The idea of the holy (trans: Harvey JW). Oxford University Press, London

  • Peterson MF (2007) The heritage of cross cultural management research: implications for the Hofstede Chair in Cultural Diversity. Int J Cross Cult Manag 7:359–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plawiuk E (2005) Gothic capitalism: the horror of accumulation and the commodification of humanity. Le Revue Gauche: A Journal of Libertarian Communist Analysis and Comment

  • Robertson J (2007) Robo Sapiens Japanicus: humanoid robots and the Posthuman family. Crit Asian Stud 39:369–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushe D (2010) Dawn of the age of the robot: advancement in robotics will dominate next decade, says head of the Institute for the Future. The Guardian, 29 Dec 2010. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/dec/30/futurologist-predicts-age-of-robots. Retrieved 3 March 2011

  • South Korea Creates Ethical Code for Righteous Robots (2007) New scientist. http://technology.newscientist.com/article/dn11334-south-korea-creates-ethical-code-for-righteous-robots.html. Retrieved 30 Aug 2007

  • Tanno DT, Jandt FE (1998) Redefining the “Other” in multicultural research. In: Martin JN, Nakayama TK, Flores LA (eds) Readings in cultural contexts. Mayfield, Mountain View, pp 477–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrun S (2004) Toward a framework for human–robot interaction. Hum Comput Interact 19:9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle S (1984) The second self: computers and the human spirit. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Umezawa R (2010) We, robots. [The spirit age: mindfully stumbling through modernity]. http://www.the-spirit-age.com/2010/07/we-robots.html. Retrieved 3 Sept 2011

  • Zhao S (2006) Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication. New Media Soc 8(3):401–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Sun Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, MS., Kim, EJ. Humanoid robots as “The Cultural Other”: are we able to love our creations?. AI & Soc 28, 309–318 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0397-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0397-z

Keywords

Navigation