Abstract
Thomas Kuhn draws the distinction between textbook history of science and history of science proper. The question addressed in the paper is whether Kuhn recommends the inclusion of distortive textbook history in science education. It is argued, pace Fuller, that Kuhn does not make normative suggestions. He does not urge the teaching of bad history and he does not aim to deceive the scientists. He highlights the significance of the retrospective history of the textbooks as a condition for the practice of science. If science is to be seen as a practice and not as a set of propositions, then textbook history is instrumental in establishing and expanding the new paradigm. The other kind of history, the history of science proper, can only be taught as part of the students’ general education and not as part of science education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Butterfield (1931) The Whig Interpretation of History Bell London
H. Butterfield (1944) The Englishman and His History Cambridge University Press Cambridge
Dewey, J.: 1917, ’The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy’, in Works, Vol. 10, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp. 3–48.
M. Friedman (2001) Dynamics of Reason Stanford. CSLI Publications California
S. Fuller (2000) Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History of Our Time The University of Chicago Press Chicago
V. Kindi (2003) ArticleTitle’Kuhn’s Conservatism’ Social Epistemology 17 IssueID2&3 209–214
T.S. Kuhn (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions The University of Chicago Press Chicago
M.R. Matthews (2004) ArticleTitle’Thomas Kuhn’s Impact on Science Education: What Lessons Can Be Learned’ Science Education 88 90–118 Occurrence Handle10.1002/sce.10111
Nickles, T.: 1992, ‘Good Science as Bad History: From Order of Knowing to Order of Being’, In McMullin, E. (ed.), The Social Dimensions of Science, Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Nietzsche, F.: 1983, ‘On the Uses & Disadvantages of History for Life’, in Untimely Meditations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
H. Siegel (1978) ArticleTitle’Kuhn and Schwab on Science texts and the Goals of Science Education’ Educational Theory 28 302–309
H. Siegel (1979) ArticleTitle’On the Distortion of the History of Science in Science Education’ Science Education 63 IssueID1 111–118
C.P. Snow (1998) The Two Cultures, Canto Series Cambridge University Press Cambridge
T. Sorell (1991) Scientism. Philosophy and the Infatuation with Science Routledge London
P.F. Strawson (1985) Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties Columbia University Press New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kindi, V. Should Science Teaching Involve the History of Science? An Assessment of Kuhn’s View. Sci Educ 14, 721–731 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-7344-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-7344-4