The metaphysics of personal identity and our special concern for the future

10Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Philosophers have long suggested that our attitude of special concern for the future is problematic for a reductionist view of personal identity, such as the one developed by Derek Parfit in Reasons and Persons. Specifically, it is often claimed that reductionism cannot provide justification for this attitude. In this article, I argue that much of the debate in this arena involves a misconception of the connection between metaphysical theories of personal identity and our special concern. A proper understanding of this connection reveals that the above-mentioned objection to reductionism cannot get off the ground. Though the connection I propose is weaker than the connection typically presupposed, I nonetheless run up against a conclusion reached by Susan Wolf in "Self-Interest and Interest in Selves." According to Wolf, metaphysical theses about the nature of personal identity have no significance for our attitude of special concern. By arguing against Wolf's treatment of self-interest, I suggest that her arguments for this conclusion are misguided. This discussion leads to further clarification of the nature of the link between theories of personal identity and our special concern and, ultimately, to a better understanding of the rationality of this attitude. © Metaphilosophy LLC and Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kind, A. (2004). The metaphysics of personal identity and our special concern for the future. Metaphilosophy, 35(4), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00335.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free