Skip to main content
Log in

Tarski's physicalism

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hartry Field has argued that Alfred Tarski desired to reduce all semantic concepts to concepts acceptable to physicalism and that Tarski failed to do this. In the two succeeding decades, Field has been charged with being too lenient with Tarski; but it has been almost universally accepted that an objection at least as strong as Field's is telling against Tarski's theory. Close examination of the relevant literature, most of it printed in this journal in the 1930s, reveals that Field's conception of physicalism is anachronistic. Tarski did succeed in furthering the sort of physicalist program he had in mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayer, A. J. (ed.): 1959,Logical Positivism, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf: 1932, ‘Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft’,Erkenntnis 2, 432–465. Page references are to the English translation published as the book (Carnap 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf: 1932–33, ‘Psychologie in physikalischer Sprache’,Erkenntnis 3, 107–142. Page references are to the English translation of George Shick, titled ‘Psychology in Physical Language’, in (Ayer 1959, pp. 165–198).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf: 1934,The Unity of Science, trans. by Max Black, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, Robert: 1975, ‘Truth and Logical Form’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, Robert: 1979, ‘Intention, Meaning and Truth-conditions’,Philosophical Studies 35, 345–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, Hartry: 1972, ‘Tarski's Theory of Truth’,Journal of Philosophy 69, 347–375. Page references are to the reprint in (Platts 1980, pp. 83–110).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, John: 1989, ‘What were Tarski's Truth-definitions For?’History and Philosophy of Logic 10, 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1975, ‘A Counterexample to Tarski-type Truth Conditions as Applied to Natural Languages’,Philosophia 5, 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeds, Stephen: 1978, ‘Theories of Reference and Truth’,Erkenntnis 13, 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, John: 1978, ‘Physicalism and Primitive Denotation: Field on Tarski’,Erkenntnis 13, 137–152. Page references are to the reprint in (Platts 1980, pp. 111–130).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto: 1930, ‘Wege der wissenschaftlichen Weltauffassung’,Erkenntnis 1, 106–125. Page references are to the English translation titled ‘Ways of the Scientific World-conception’, in (Neurath 1983, pp. 32–47).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto: 1931a, ‘Physikalismus’,Scientia 50, 297–303. Page references are to the English translation titled ‘Physicalism’ in (Neurath 1983, pp. 52–57).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto: 1931b, ‘Soziologie im Physikalismus’,Erkenntnis 2, 393–431. Page references are to the English translalion titled ‘Sociology in the Framework of Physicalism’ in (Neurath 1983, pp. 58–90).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto: 1932–33, ‘Protokollsätze’,Erkenntnis 3, 204–214. Page references are to the English translation titled ‘Protocol Statements’ in (Neurath 1983, pp. 91–99).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto: 1983,Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, ed. and trans. by Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Kathryn Pyne: 1973, ‘Ambiguity and the Truth Definition’,Nous 7, 379–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, Mark (ed.): 1980,Reference, Truth and Reality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, Hans: 1929, ‘Ziele und Wege der physikalischen Erkenntnis’,Handbuch der Physik vol. 4, Springer, Berlin, pp. 1–80. Page references are to the English translation titled ‘The Aims and Methods of Physical Knowledge’ in (Reichenbach 1978, vol. 2, 120–225).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, Hans: 1931,Ziele und Wege der heutigen Naturphilosophie, Felix Meiner, Leipzig. Page references are to the English translation titled ‘Aims and Methods of Modern Philosophy of Nature’ in (Reichenbach 1978, vol. 1, 359–388).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, Hans: 1978,Selected Writings 1909–1953, 2 vols., ed. by M. Reichenbach and R. S. Cohen with trans. by E. S. Schneewind and M. Reichenbach, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, Scott: 1984, ‘What is a Theory of Truth?’,Journal of Philosophy 81, 411–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Robert C.: 1987,Inquiry, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, Alfred: 1933,Pojecie Prawdy w Jezykach Nauk Dedukcyjnych, Warsaw. Page references are to the translation titled ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, in (Tarski 1983, pp. 152–278).

  • Tarski, Alfred: 1936, ‘O Ugruntowaniu Naukowej Semantyki’,Przeglak Filozoficzny 39, 50–57. Page references are to the translation titled ‘The Establishment of Scientific Semantics’ in (Tarski 1983, pp. 401–408).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, Alfred: 1983,Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, 2nd. ed., trans. by J. H. Woodger, Hackett, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolenski, Jan: 1986, ‘Reism and Lesniewski's Ontology’,History and Philosophy of Logic 7, 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirkham, R.L. Tarski's physicalism. Erkenntnis 38, 289–302 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128232

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128232

Keywords

Navigation