Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics and Action: A Relational Perspective on Consumer Choice in the European Politics of Food

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The lack of consistency between people’s engagement in ethical issues and their food choices has received considerable attention. Consumption as “choice” dominates this discourse, understood as decision-making at the point of purchase. But ideas concentrating on individual choice are problematic when trying to understand how social and ethical issues emerge and are dealt with in the practices of buying and eating food. I argue in this paper that “consumer choice” is better understood as a political ideology addressing a particular way in which everyday practices can be directed so as to solve social problems. It is a way that makes questions of power particularly challenging. Some assume consumer sovereignty, emphasizing consumer choice as a reflection of neoliberal deregulation and commercialization. Others worry that ongoing changes increase consumers’ powerlessness. None of these seem to capture that there is active regulation, where public as well as commercial and civil actors are making strong efforts to make people do the right thing—voluntarily. Labeling is the key measure. In practice, the individualized and rationalized model of responsibility depends not only on market opportunities, but even political and social expectations and trust. People may lack concrete capabilities and power to follow up on moral calls, but they may also have a different understanding of who is responsible and what is a “good deed,” or their actions may, in a Foucauldian sense, represent resistance. The paper will, with examples from European empirical studies, discuss how mobilization as well as inertia and disinterest emerge within specific political constellations and practical contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the following, the concept “advanced liberalism” is used instead of the more widely used “neoliberalism”. The concept encompasses market-state relations as well as those between individuals and the State and it grants the State a new, but still active role.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almås, R. (1999). Food trust, ethics and safety in risk society. Sociological Research Online, 4(3), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., & Vogel, D. (2006). Why the Beef? The contested governance of European food safety. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, C., & Bacchi, C. (2007). Envisaging a new politics for an ethical future. Beyond trust, care and generosity—towards an ethic of `social flesh’. Feminist Theory, 8(3), 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Bonss, W., & Lau, C. (2003). The theory of reflexive modernization: problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture and Society, 20(2), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. M. (1995). The value of farm animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46, 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, L., Kjærnes, U., Ganskau, E., Minina, V., Voltchkova, L., Halkier, B., et al. (2005). Trust in food safety in Russia, Denmark and Norway. European Societies, 7(1), 103–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørner, T. B., Hansen, L. G., & Russell, C. S. (2004). Environmental labelling and consumers’ choice—an empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic Swan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47, 411–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blokhuis, H. J., Jones, R. B., Geers, R., Miele, M., & Veissier, I. (2003). Measuring and monitoring animal welfare: Transparency in the food product quality chain. Animal Welfare, 12(4), 445–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, B., & van Leeuven, F. (2005). Socio-political and market developments. In J. Roex & M. Miele (Eds.), Farm animal welfare concerns. Consumers, retailers and producers. Welfare quality reports No. 1. Cardiff: Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonny, S. (2000). Les consommateurs, l’agriculture, la qualité et la securité des aliment: une analyse du questionnement des consommateurs et des reponses apportées. Productions Animales, 13(5), 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boström, M., & Klintman, M. (2008). Eco-standards, product labelling and green consumerism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1998). Institutionalizing distrust, enculturating trust. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and governance. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brom, F. W. A. (2000). Food, consumer concerns, and trust: Food ethics for a globalizing market. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L. (2000). The moral economy of grades and standards. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(3), 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. (1996). Detraditionalization, character and the limits of agency. In P. Heelas, S. Lash, & P. Morris (Eds.), Detraditionalization. Critical reflections on authority and identity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coff, C. (2005). Smag for etik. På sporet efter fødevareetikken. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanums Forlag, Copenhagen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. (2003). A consumers’ republic: The politics of mass consumption in postwar America. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coveney, J. (2000). Food, morals and meanings: The pleasure and anxiety of eating. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jonge, J., van Kleef, E., Frewer, L., & Renn, O. (2007). Perception of risk, benefit and trust associated with consumer food choice. In L. Frewer & H. C. Van Trijp (Eds.), Understanding consumers of food products. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. L. (1991). Feeding the family. The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, S., Bear, C., & Walker, G. (2008). Mucky carrots and other proxies: Problematising the knowledge-fix for sustainable and ethical consumption. Geoforum, 39, 1044–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer. (2005). Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals. Special Eurobarometer 229, wave 63.2. Brussels: DG SANCO, European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1998). Eurobarometer 49 on food safety. Brussels: European Commission DG XXIV and Inra European Coordination Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., & Jackson, T. (2008). Sustainable consumption: Perspectives from social and cultural theory. RESOLVE working paper 05-08. Guildford: University of Surrey.

  • Evans, A., & Miele, M. (2008). Comparative focus group report. Welfare quality working paper series No. 7. Cardiff: Cardiff University Press.

  • Fine, B. (2002). The world of consumption (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. (2004). Debating production-consumption linkages in food studies. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(3), 332–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischler, C. (1988). Food, self and identity. Social Science Information, 27(2), 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follesdal, A. (2004). Political consumersim as chance and challenge. In M. Micheletti, A. Follesdal, & D. Stolle (Eds.), Politics, products and markets. Exploring political consumerism past and present. New Bruswick, USA, London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Governmentality. Ideology and Consciousness, 6, 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y., & Lang, T. (1995). The unmanageable consumer. Contemporary consumption and its fragmentations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1994). Replies and critiques. Risk, trust, reflexivity. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aestethics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granquist, G. (2002). Determinants of choice of eco-labelled products. Dissertation. Gothenburg: Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg.

  • Gronow, J. (2004). Standards of taste and varieties of goodness: The (un)predictability of modern consumption. In M. Harvey, A. McMeekin, & A. Warde (Eds.), Qualities of food. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2004). The trouble with ‘organic lite’ in California: A rejoinder to the ‘conventionalistion’ debate. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(3), 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2007). The polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode, 39(3), 456–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2008). Thinking inside the neoliberal box: The micro-politics of agro-food philanthropy. Geoforum, 39(3), 1241–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkier, B. (2001). Risk and food: environmental concerns and consumer practices. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 36, 801–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkier, B., & Holm, L. (2006). Shifting responsibilities for food safety in Europe. An introduction. Appetite, 47(2), 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R., Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2005). The ethical consumer. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M., McMeekin, A., & Warde, A. (2004). Qualities of food. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, M. (2009). Prosperity for all: Consumer activism in an era of globalization. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, L. (2003). Food health policies and ethics: Lay perspectives on functional foods. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 16, 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, E., & Dulsrud, A. (2007). Will consumers save the world? The framing of political consumerism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 20, 469–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2004). The politics of regulation in the age of governance. In J. Jordana & D. Levi-Faur (Eds.), The politics of regulation. Institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnes, U. (2008). Regulating food consumption. Studies of change and variation in Europe. PhD dissertation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

  • Kjærnes, U., Harvey, M., & Warde, A. (2007). Trust in food. A comparative and institutional analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnes, U., Holm, L., Gronow, J., Mäkelä, J., & Ekström, M. P. (2009). The study of Nordic meals: Lessons learnt. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Meals in science and practice: interdisciplinary research and business applications. London: Woodhead Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnes, U., & Lavik, R. (2008). Opinions on animal welfare and food consumption in seven European countries. In U. Kjærnes, B. B. Bock, E. Roe, & J. Roex (Eds.), Consumption, distribution and production of farm animal welfare. Welfare quality reports No. 7. Cardiff: Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthals, M. (2001a). Ethical dilemmas in sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 36, 813–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthals, M. (2001b). Taking consumers seriously: Two concepts of consumer sovereignty. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14(2), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagerspetz, O. (1998). Trust: The tacit demand. Dodrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T. (2003). Food industrialisation and food power: Implications for food governance. Development Policy Review, 21(5–6), 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobb, A. E., & Mazzocchi, M. (2007). Domestically produced food: Consumer perceptions of origin, safety and the issue of trust. Food Economics—Acta Agricult Scand C, 4, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power: Two works. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (2005). Power. A radical view (2nd ed.). Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusk, J. L., Nilsson, T., & Foster, K. (2007). Public preferences and private choices: Effect of altruism and free riding on demand of environmentally certified pork. Environmental and Resource Economcs, 36, 499–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, M., & Koivisto Hursti, U. K. (2004). Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Appetite, 39, 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., Flynn, A., & Harrison, M. (2000). Consuming interests. The social provision of foods. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, L. E., Bennett, R. M., Tranter, R. B., & Wooldridge, M. J. (2007). Consumption of welfare-friendly food products in Great Britain, Italy and Sweden, and how it may be influenced by consumer attitudes to, and behaviour towards, animal welfare attributes. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 15(3), 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1990). Culture and consumption. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mestdag, I. (2005). Disappearance of the traditional meal: Temporal, social and spatial destructuration. Appetite, 45, 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping. Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. New York and Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M., Follesdal, A., & Stolle, D. (2004). Politics, products, and markets. Exploring political consumerism past and present. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1998). The dialectics of shopping. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present. Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. (1995). Trust in modern societies: The search for the bases of social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K., Marsden, T., & Murdoch, J. (2006). Worlds of food. Place, power, and provenance in the food chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J., & Miele, M. (1999). Back to nature’: changing ‘worlds of production’ in the food sector. Sociologia Ruralis, 39(4), 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nestle, M. (2002). Food politics. How the food industry influences nutrition and health. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newholm, T. (2000). Consumer exit, voice, and loyalty: indicative, legitimation, and regulatory role in agricultural and food ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niva, M. (2007). ‘All foods affect health’: Understandings of functional foods and healthy eating among health-oriented Finns. Appetite, 48, 384–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S. (2002). The ‘latte revolution’? Regulation, markets and consumption in the global coffee chain. World Development, 30(7), 1099–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulain, J. P. (2002). The contemporary diet in France: ‘De-structuration’ or from commensalism to ‘vagabond feeding’. Appetite, 39(1), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society. Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantala, K., & Sulkunen, P. (2006). The communitarian preventive paradox: Preventing substance misuse without the substance. Critical Social Policy, 23(4), 477–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L. T. (2002). Consumer/producer links in fair trade coffee networks. Sociologia Ruralis, 42(4), 402–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, E., & Marsden, T. (2007). Analysis of the retail survey of products that carry welfare-claims and of non-retailer led assurance schemes whose logos accompany welfare-claims. In U. Kjærnes, M. Miele, & J. Roex (Eds.). Attitudes of consumers, retailers and producers to farm animal welfare. Welfare quality report No. 2. Cardiff: Cardiff University.

  • Rose, R. (1999). Powers of freedom. Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). The semisovereign people. A realist’s view of democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. W. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarstad, G. Å., Terragni, L., & Torjusen, H. (2007). Animal welfare according to Norwegian consumers and producers: Definitions and implications. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 15(3), 74–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C. (1990). Morality and the market. Consumer pressure for corporate accountability. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southerton, D., Warde, A., & Hand, M. (2004). The limited autonomy of the consumer: implications for sustainable consumption. In D. Southerton, H. Chappells, & B. Van Vliet (Eds.), Sustainable consumption. The implications of changing infrastructures of provision. Cheltenham, UK, Northamption, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren, G. (2004). Sustainable consumption: a theoretical and environmental policy perspective. In D. Southerton, H. Chappells, & B. Van Vliet (Eds.), Sustainable consumption. The implications of changing infrastructures of provision. Cheltenham UK, Northamption, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulkunen, P., Rantala, K., & Määttä, M. (2004). The ethics of not taking a stand: dilemmas of drug and alcohol prevention in a consumer society—A case study. International Journal of Drug Policy, 15, 427–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S., Pharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. D. (2000). Mad cows and social activists: contentious politics in the trilaterial democracies. In S. Tarrow (Ed.), Disaffected democracies. What’s troubling the trilaterial countries?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J. (1994). Monetary incentives and environmental concern. Effects of a differentiated garbage fee. Journal of Consumer Policy, 17(4), 407–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torjusen, H. C., Kjærnes, U., Sangstad, L., & O’Doherty Jensen, K. (2004). European consumers’ conceptions of organic food. Professional report No. 4. Oslo: The National Institute for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uusitalo, L. (2005). Consumers as citizens—Three approaches to collective consumer problems. In K. G. Grünert, & J. Thøgersen (Eds.). Consumers, policy and the environment. A tribute to Folke Ölander. New York: Springer.

  • Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: exploring the consumer “attitude-behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Völker, B., & Flap, H. (2001). Weak ties as a liability. The case of East Germany. Rationality and Society, 13(4), 397–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlen, S. (2009). The consumer stuck between a rock of victimhood and a hard place called responsibility: Political discourses on the ‘consumer’ in Finnish and German governmental policy documents. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A. (1997). Consumption, food and taste. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, H. (2000). A short history of food ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12, 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The National Institute for Consumer Research (SIFO), 4682, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway

    Unni Kjærnes

Authors
  1. Unni Kjærnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Unni Kjærnes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kjærnes, U. Ethics and Action: A Relational Perspective on Consumer Choice in the European Politics of Food. J Agric Environ Ethics 25, 145–162 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9315-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9315-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation